Existentialist Period in Philosophy

1. Introduction

The Existentialist Period in philosophy designates a broad era, roughly from the 1840s to the mid-1970s, during which questions of individual existence, meaning, and freedom became central to philosophical debate. Rather than beginning from abstract essences, rational systems, or timeless truths, thinkers of this period approached philosophy from the standpoint of lived experience, finitude, and decision, often in explicit contrast to the metaphysical systems of German Idealism and to the optimism of Enlightenment rationalism.

This period is commonly traced back to Søren Kierkegaard and Friedrich Nietzsche, whose critiques of Hegelianism and traditional Christianity, and whose reflections on subjectivity, faith, and nihilism, set the stage for later developments. It becomes a self-conscious “movement” only later, particularly in interwar and post–World War II France and Germany, with figures such as Martin Heidegger, Jean-Paul Sartre, Simone de Beauvoir, Albert Camus, and Maurice Merleau-Ponty.

Although labeled “existentialism,” the period encompasses both atheistic and religious currents, phenomenological and literary approaches, and politically engaged as well as apparently apolitical strands. Its shared focus lies in problems such as:

• the absence or crisis of ultimate foundations (“the death of God”),
• the nature of freedom and responsibility,
• experiences of anxiety, absurdity, and alienation,
• the pursuit of authenticity in mass, bureaucratic societies.

The Existentialist Period is now often understood as a historical constellation rather than a single school: a network of debates and texts responding to industrialization, world wars, and the erosion of traditional certainties. Subsequent movements—post-structuralism, hermeneutics, critical theory, analytic philosophy of mind—would both criticize and appropriate its central themes, ensuring that existential questions continue to shape philosophical reflection even after existentialism ceased to be a dominant label.

2. Chronological Boundaries of the Existentialist Period

Historians commonly treat the Existentialist Period as a distinct but porous epoch, framed by key publications and cultural shifts rather than by strict dates. The following table summarizes widely cited chronological markers:

Debates about Periodization

Scholars differ on both the start and end of the period:

• Some extend the origins back to Romanticism or even to Pascal, emphasizing earlier anticipations of existential themes.
• Others restrict “existentialism” to the French post-war milieu, treating Kierkegaard and Nietzsche primarily as precursors.
• On the later side, some argue that existentialism effectively waned by the early 1960s, eclipsed by structuralism and analytic philosophy; others see existential motifs persisting into the 1980s in liberation theology, critical theory, and feminist thought.

Despite these disagreements, there is broad agreement that existentialism functioned as a central reference point for European and global philosophy from the late 19th century through the mid-20th century, before being dispersed into a variety of successor movements.

3. Historical Context and Socio-Political Background

The Existentialist Period unfolded within dramatic transformations of state, society, and warfare that shaped its preoccupation with anxiety, responsibility, and meaning.

Political and Economic Transformations

The decline of absolutist monarchies, the spread of liberal constitutions, and the rise of mass political movements (socialist, nationalist, fascist) redefined the relationship between individual and state. Industrialization brought rapid urbanization, new class structures, and factory labor, often experienced as alienating and impersonal. Existential thinkers interpreted these conditions as fostering a sense of depersonalization and loss of traditional anchors.

World Wars and Totalitarianism

World War I, with its mechanized slaughter, challenged beliefs in rational progress and moral order. World War II, the Holocaust, and the atomic bomb intensified the sense of an absurd, potentially meaningless world in which human beings could be exterminated bureaucratically or annihilated technologically. Existential authors often treated these events as paradigmatic of limit situations in which individuals confront guilt, complicity, or radical vulnerability.

The rise of fascism, Nazism, and Stalinist communism confronted philosophers with the problem of totalitarianism: how individuals could retain responsibility and integrity within oppressive systems. Some thinkers, such as Sartre and Beauvoir, insisted on political engagement; others, including Heidegger and Jaspers, became embroiled in or reacted to these regimes in complex and controversial ways.

Mass Culture and Everyday Life

The expansion of mass media, popular entertainment, and consumer culture contributed to fears of conformity and inauthentic existence. Existential philosophers frequently described individuals as absorbed in “the crowd”, “the they”, or “public opinion”, themes that intersected with sociological analyses of mass society. Against this backdrop, the existential emphasis on individual decision, commitment, and authentic life-projects emerged as a response to perceived pressures of standardization and anonymity.

4. Scientific, Cultural, and Artistic Developments

Scientific and artistic changes during this period substantially shaped the emergence and reception of existential thought, often by destabilizing inherited worldviews and providing new means for expressing existential themes.

Scientific and Intellectual Shifts

Several developments eroded traditional metaphysical and theological certainties:

Some existential thinkers, such as Karl Jaspers and Paul Tillich, explicitly engaged with scientific modernity to articulate non-dogmatic forms of transcendence, while others, including Sartre, stressed human freedom against naturalistic or deterministic pictures.

Cultural and Artistic Modernism

The rise of modernist movements in literature and art provided both themes and forms congenial to existential concerns:

• Symbolism, expressionism, and Surrealism experimented with subjectivity, dream, and fragmentation.
• The Theatre of the Absurd (e.g., Samuel Beckett, Eugène Ionesco) dramatized meaninglessness, repetition, and failure of communication.
• Avant-garde cinema and visual arts explored alienation, the uncanny, and breakdowns of narrative coherence.

Many existential philosophers were also novelists, playwrights, or essayists. Sartre, Camus, and Unamuno, among others, used literary forms to stage philosophical problems—such as responsibility under occupation or revolt against absurdity—in ways that philosophical treatises alone might not capture. Conversely, non-philosophical artists drew on existential vocabulary, helping to popularize notions like the absurd, authenticity, and existential angst in broader culture.

These cultural and scientific developments thus formed a backdrop in which existential questions appeared not as abstract speculations but as urgent responses to a rapidly changing understanding of the world and of human beings within it.

5. Religion, Secularization, and the “Death of God”

Questions of religion and secularization are central to the Existentialist Period, framing debates about meaning, value, and transcendence.

Secularization and Crisis of Belief

Processes of urbanization, scientific advancement, and historical criticism of scripture contributed to what many perceived as a waning of traditional religious authority. Churches remained influential, yet for many educated Europeans and later global audiences, belief no longer appeared self-evident. Existential thinkers interpreted this as a crisis that exposed individuals to radical responsibility and ambiguity.

Nietzsche’s famous pronouncement captures this shift:

"

“God is dead. God remains dead. And we have killed him.”

— Friedrich Nietzsche, The Gay Science, §125

This phrase is widely read as naming not a literal event but a cultural condition in which the old metaphysical and moral frameworks have lost their binding force, leaving humans to confront nihilism.

Religious Existentialism

Not all existentialists were atheists. Religious existentialists argued that faith becomes more, not less, urgent under modern conditions:

• Kierkegaard conceived faith as a passionate leap beyond rational proofs, emphasizing inwardness and the individual’s relation to God against “Christendom” as an institution.
• Gabriel Marcel and Karl Jaspers treated transcendence as encountered in mystery, fidelity, and limit situations, rather than as a dogmatic object.
• Paul Tillich interpreted God as “the ground of being,” recasting theology in existential terms of ultimate concern and courage to be.
• Jewish thinkers such as Martin Buber and Franz Rosenzweig rethought covenant and revelation as dialogical, stressing the I–Thou relationship and concrete historical existence.

These authors typically argued that modern doubt and anguish disclose the depth dimension of faith, which cannot rest on objective certainty.

Atheistic and Agnostic Existentialism

Atheistic existentialists, including Sartre, Beauvoir, and often Camus, interpreted the absence of God as the starting point for ethics and politics. Humans, in this view, are “condemned to be free”, without divinely given essences or moral laws. Proponents argue that this condition entails:

• radical freedom and responsibility,
• the need to create values through choice and commitment,
• the recognition of absurdity or contingency as inescapable.

Camus, while rejecting faith as a “philosophical suicide,” nevertheless endorsed revolt, solidarity, and a form of this-worldly dignity in the face of the absurd.

Post-Holocaust and Postwar Theologies

After the Holocaust, some Jewish and Christian thinkers reinterpreted divine absence or silence in existential terms, questioning traditional theodicies and emphasizing protest, memory, and ethical responsibility over metaphysical explanations. Within this context, existentialism provided conceptual tools to grapple with faith after catastrophe and with the tension between transcendence and historical suffering.

6. The Zeitgeist: Anxiety, Alienation, and Modernity

Observers frequently describe the Existentialist Period as crystallizing a mood or Zeitgeist dominated by anxiety, alienation, and a sense of dislocation in modern societies.

Anxiety and Groundlessness

Existential anxiety (Angst) was interpreted not merely as a clinical symptom but as revealing a basic feature of human existence. Thinkers such as Kierkegaard, Heidegger, and Tillich suggested that anxiety exposes:

• the groundlessness of our projects,
• our freedom to choose among possibilities,
• our awareness of death and finitude.

In contrast to fear, which has a definite object, anxiety was described as objectless, directed toward nothing in particular and thus uncovering the nothingness at the heart of human possibilities.

Alienation and Mass Society

Industrialization, bureaucratization, and mass media generated experiences of estrangement from work, community, and even oneself. Existential writers depicted individuals as:

• absorbed into anonymous collectives (“the crowd”, “the they”),
• reduced to functions or roles in organizations,
• subject to standardized desires and lifestyles.

These themes overlapped with Marxist analyses of alienation but were often framed in terms of authenticity versus inauthenticity rather than solely economic exploitation.

Modernity as Crisis

For many existential thinkers, modernity was neither simply progress nor decline but a crisis: inherited values and narratives had lost credibility, while no new consensus had taken their place. This condition produced both despair and opportunity:

Some commentators argue that existentialism gave conceptual voice to widely felt experiences of disorientation, particularly among intellectuals and urban youth in the mid-20th century. Others suggest that it articulated a more general modern predicament in which individuals must navigate between conformity, nihilism, and the search for authentic commitments.

7. Central Philosophical Problems of the Era

While diverse in method and outlook, existential thinkers tended to cluster around a set of interrelated philosophical problems.

Meaning, Nihilism, and the Absurd

The erosion of traditional religious and metaphysical frameworks raised the question: Does life have any inherent meaning? Nietzsche framed this as the problem of nihilism, while Camus articulated the absurd as the clash between human longing for coherence and an indifferent universe. Responses ranged from:

• value-creation through artistic or moral projects,
• religious faith as a leap beyond reason,
• lucid revolt without appeal to transcendence.

Freedom, Responsibility, and Bad Faith

Existentialists generally emphasized human freedom, often radicalized as the capacity to transcend given facts (facticity). This raised further questions:

• How can individuals be responsible amid social and psychological constraints?
• Why do they often flee from freedom into bad faith, self-deception, or conformity?

Sartre’s notion of bad faith analyzed strategies by which agents deny their own freedom by treating themselves as mere things or roles.

Authenticity and Inauthenticity

The ideal of authenticity—living in accordance with one’s ownmost possibilities rather than external expectations—became a central ethical and existential norm. Heidegger, Jaspers, and Beauvoir, among others, explored:

• how authenticity relates to social norms and historical conditions,
• whether authenticity is compatible with solidarity and ethics, or risks sliding into individualism.

Finitude, Temporality, and Death

Existential philosophers argued that mortality and time are not peripheral but constitutive of human existence. Heidegger’s concept of being-toward-death and Jaspers’s notion of limit situations emphasized:

• the inevitability of death as revealing the urgency and fragility of choices,
• the impossibility of fully mastering or objectifying one’s life.

Embodiment, Emotion, and the Other

Against purely rationalist models of the subject, existentialists stressed embodiment, emotion, and interpersonal relations:

• Merleau-Ponty developed a phenomenology of the lived body.
• Sartre, Beauvoir, and Levinas analyzed the encounter with the Other, exploring shame, desire, objectification, and ethical responsibility.

These problems formed a shared agenda around which otherwise disparate thinkers debated, disagreed, and cross-fertilized their approaches.

8. Major Schools and Currents within Existential Thought

Within the Existentialist Period, several identifiable schools and currents emerged, differing in method, metaphysics, and political orientation while sharing a focus on existence.

Existential Phenomenology

Rooted in Husserl’s phenomenology, this current sought to describe structures of lived experience:

• Heidegger reoriented phenomenology toward ontology, analyzing Dasein’s being-in-the-world, care, and temporality.
• Merleau-Ponty emphasized embodiment and perception.
• Jaspers and Ricoeur combined phenomenology with hermeneutics to explore meaning and narrative.

Proponents argued that phenomenology offers rigorous descriptions of existence without recourse to speculative metaphysics.

Atheistic Existentialism

Often associated with Sartre and Beauvoir, this line maintained that:

• existence precedes essence; humans define themselves through acts,
• there is no God or fixed human nature, making freedom and responsibility inescapable,
• ethical and political commitments arise from situated freedom (situation).

Atheistic existentialists typically used phenomenology and literary narrative to analyze consciousness, bad faith, and social oppression.

Religious and Theological Existentialism

This current includes Christian and Jewish thinkers:

• Kierkegaard, Marcel, Tillich, Buber, and Rosenzweig reinterpreted faith as existential commitment, dialogue, or ultimate concern.
• They often criticized both secular nihilism and institutionalized religion, stressing personal encounter with God or the divine.

Their work influenced neo-orthodox theology and later liberation and post-Holocaust theologies.

Personalism and Dialogical Philosophy

Figures like Buber, Emmanuel Mounier, and some Catholic personalists emphasized:

• the primacy of person-to-person relations,
• dignity of the person against collectivist or technocratic reductions,
• community, solidarity, and interpersonal recognition.

Though not always labeled “existentialist,” these approaches shared existentialism’s concerns with freedom, responsibility, and authentic relation.

Existential Marxism and Critical Currents

Some Marxist and critical theorists integrated existential categories:

• Lukács, Sartre (later), and Marcuse drew on alienation, praxis, and subjectivity to reinterpret class struggle and reification.
• Fanon applied existential and phenomenological analysis to colonialism and racism, examining lived experience of oppression.

These currents debated how individual freedom relates to structures such as class, race, and colonial domination, thereby extending existentialism into socio-political critique.

9. Internal Chronology and Phases of Development

Scholars often divide the Existentialist Period into four overlapping phases, reflecting shifts in philosophical style, institutional setting, and historical context.

1. Proto-Existentialist and Early Critique (1840–1900)

This phase centers on Kierkegaard and Nietzsche, along with literary figures like Dostoevsky and Tolstoy. Existential themes—subjective truth, faith as leap, nihilism, value-creation—emerge primarily in polemical, literary, or theological forms rather than as a named movement. The main target is Hegelian system-building and complacent bourgeois Christianity.

2. Phenomenological and Early 20th-Century Turn (1900–1933)

With Husserl, Jaspers, early Heidegger, and Scheler, existential questions become entwined with academic phenomenology and Lebensphilosophie (philosophy of life). The focus shifts from abstract consciousness to existence, historicity, and limit situations. This period establishes crucial conceptual tools—intentionality, being-in-the-world—that later existentialists will adopt.

3. Classical or High Existentialism (1933–1960)

Under the shadow of fascism, World War II, and the Holocaust, existentialism crystallizes publicly:

Disputes arise over atheism vs. religious faith, literary vs. systematic methods, and political commitment vs. philosophical reflection.

4. Late Existentialism and Transition (1960–1975)

Existentialism increasingly interacts with structuralism, post-structuralism, psychoanalysis, and Marxism:

• Levinas, Ricoeur, and the Kyoto School recast existential phenomenology in ethical and hermeneutic terms.
• Sartre’s later work moves toward existential Marxism.
• Emergent feminist, postcolonial, and liberationist currents appropriate existential ideas while critiquing their limitations.

By the mid-1970s, existentialism is less a coherent school than a diffuse set of themes embedded in newer theoretical frameworks. The deaths of Heidegger (1976) and Sartre (1980) are often treated as symbolic markers of the close of the classical era, even as existential motifs continue to circulate.

10. Key Figures and Regional Variations

Existential thought developed unevenly across regions, shaped by linguistic, religious, and political contexts. The following overview highlights major clusters without claiming strict boundaries.

Nordic and German-Danish Foundations

• Søren Kierkegaard (Denmark) introduced existential themes of subjective truth, despair, and faith.
• Friedrich Nietzsche (Germany/Switzerland) diagnosed nihilism and championed revaluation of values.
• Martin Heidegger, Karl Jaspers, and Max Scheler (Germany) integrated existential concerns into phenomenology and philosophy of existence, influencing theology and social theory.

French Existentialism and Phenomenology

France became the public “epicenter” of existentialism:

These thinkers engaged intensely with literature, politics, and psychoanalysis, shaping the global image of existentialism.

Central and Eastern European & Russian Currents

In Russia and Central Europe, existential themes intersected with Orthodox Christianity, revolution, and literary culture:

• Dostoevsky, Kafka, and Shestov explored guilt, freedom, and the absurd through fiction and essays.
• Nikolai Berdyaev combined religious existentialism with social critique.
• Edmund Husserl (Austro-German), though not an existentialist per se, provided phenomenological tools widely adopted by existential thinkers.

Jewish Existential and Dialogical Thinkers

Jewish philosophers contributed distinctively dialogical and ethical perspectives:

• Martin Buber developed the I–Thou relation as fundamental to personhood.
• Emmanuel Levinas reconceived ethics as responsibility to the Other’s face.
• Franz Rosenzweig reinterpreted revelation and redemption in existential-historical terms.
• Paul Tillich and Hannah Arendt, though not all strictly “existentialists,” engaged deeply with existential categories in theology and political philosophy.

Anglo-American and Global Reception

In the Anglophone world and beyond, existentialism was both imported and locally reworked:

• US and UK writers such as William Barrett popularized existentialism, while Rollo May and Irvin Yalom brought it into psychotherapy.
• Spanish and Latin American authors, including Miguel de Unamuno and José Ortega y Gasset, integrated existential motifs with questions of national identity and cultural crisis.
• The Kyoto School in Japan (Nishida Kitarō, Keiji Nishitani) drew on both Zen Buddhism and European existential phenomenology.
• Frantz Fanon, in the Caribbean and African decolonization contexts, applied existential-phenomenological analysis to race, colonialism, and violence.

These regional variations underline that existentialism was not purely a French or German affair, but a transnational constellation of engagements with modernity and the human condition.

11. Landmark Texts and Canon Formation

The existential canon emerged through a combination of philosophical reception, publishing practices, and cultural influence. Certain works came to be regarded as emblematic, though scholars debate which texts deserve canonical status.

Widely Recognized Landmark Texts

Other significant works include Jaspers’ Philosophy, Marcel’s Being and Having, Merleau-Ponty’s Phenomenology of Perception, Buber’s I and Thou, and Levinas’s Totality and Infinity.

Processes of Canon Formation

Several factors shaped which texts became canonical:

• Translation and publishing: Works translated early into major languages (especially English and French) gained disproportionate visibility.
• University curricula: Post-war philosophy and literature courses often highlighted Sartre, Camus, and Heidegger, cementing their status.
• Cultural reception: Novels, plays, and essays that resonated with post-war youth and intellectuals were more readily canonized than technical writings.

Debates and Revisions

Recent scholarship has revised the canon in several ways:

• Giving greater attention to women existentialists (e.g., Beauvoir beyond The Second Sex, Beauvoir’s and Arendt’s broader oeuvre).
• Highlighting non-European contributors, including Unamuno, Fanon, and the Kyoto School.
• Reassessing the place of literary works (Dostoevsky’s novels, Kafka’s stories, Beckett’s plays) as central rather than peripheral to existential philosophy.

Thus, the existential canon is increasingly seen as plural and contested, reflecting diverse routes into the core concerns of the movement.

12. Existentialism in Literature, Theater, and the Arts

Existentialism’s influence on literature, theater, and the arts was both reciprocal and formative: artistic works often prefigured or crystallized philosophical themes, while philosophical concepts in turn shaped artistic production.

Literary Expressions

Novelists and storytellers gave concrete narrative form to existential dilemmas:

• Dostoevsky’s Notes from Underground and The Brothers Karamazov probe freedom, guilt, and rebellion against God.
• Kafka’s works (The Trial, The Castle) depict opaque bureaucracies and existential helplessness.
• Sartre (Nausea, Roads to Freedom trilogy), Beauvoir (She Came to Stay, The Mandarins), and Camus (The Stranger, The Plague) used fiction to explore nausea, absurdity, and moral ambiguity under occupation and disease.

Such texts allowed readers to experience existential situations—choice under duress, confrontation with death, estrangement—beyond abstract argument.

Theater and the Absurd

The stage became a privileged medium for dramatizing existential concerns:

The so‑called Theatre of the Absurd is often linked with existentialism, though scholars dispute direct doctrinal influence. These plays typically feature fragmented plots, circular dialogues, and unresolved endings, mirroring perceived meaninglessness and communicative breakdown.

Visual Arts and Cinema

In painting, film, and photography, existential themes appeared through:

• Expressionist and surrealist imagery of inner torment, dream, and estrangement.
• Post-war European cinema (e.g., films by Ingmar Bergman, Michelangelo Antonioni, Akira Kurosawa) that explored alienation, faith, and moral ambiguity.
• Film noir and later art-house films emphasizing fatalism, isolation, and ambiguity.

Some directors explicitly engaged with existential texts, while others were later interpreted through existential lenses by critics.

Overall, literature and the arts functioned as primary vehicles for diffusing existential motifs—such as absurdity, authenticity, and the weight of choice—well beyond academic philosophy, helping to define the public image of the Existentialist Period.

13. Existentialism, Psychology, and Psychoanalysis

The Existentialist Period saw significant cross-pollination between existential philosophy, psychology, and psychoanalysis, reshaping conceptions of mental life, therapy, and pathology.

Existential Critiques of Classical Psychoanalysis

Many existential thinkers engaged with Freud but criticized what they saw as:

• an overly deterministic model of the psyche,
• reduction of meaning to drives or childhood events,
• insufficient attention to freedom and choice.

Sartre’s notion of existential psychoanalysis proposed interpreting character and behavior as expressions of a person’s fundamental project—a global, chosen orientation toward the world—rather than as mere symptoms of unconscious mechanisms.

Emergence of Existential and Humanistic Psychotherapies

From the mid-20th century, therapists developed approaches explicitly inspired by existential themes:

These schools argue that psychological distress often arises from avoidance of freedom, loss of meaning, or inauthentic living, rather than solely from intrapsychic conflict.

Anxiety, Guilt, and Authenticity as Clinical Concepts

Existential therapists reconceptualized experiences like anxiety and guilt:

• Normal or ontological anxiety is viewed as an inevitable part of confronting freedom and death, potentially constructive.
• Neurotic anxiety is seen as avoidance or distortion of this basic condition.
• Existential guilt stems from failing to realize one’s possibilities, rather than from moral transgression alone.

Such distinctions provided alternative frameworks to diagnostic categories, influencing both clinical practice and popular self-help literature.

Interactions with Humanistic Psychology

Existential ideas also informed humanistic psychology (e.g., Carl Rogers, Abraham Maslow), which, while not strictly existentialist, shared emphasis on:

• self-actualization,
• personal growth,
• therapeutic relationship as authentic encounter.

In sum, existentialism significantly reoriented psychological and psychotherapeutic discourse toward meaning, freedom, and authenticity, offering both critiques of traditional psychoanalysis and new models of therapeutic engagement.

14. Political and Feminist Appropriations of Existentialism

Existentialism’s focus on freedom, situation, and the Other made it attractive for political and feminist theorizing, although these appropriations often modified or criticized classical formulations.

Political Engagement and Existential Marxism

In post-war France, existentialism became closely associated with debates about political responsibility:

• Sartre argued that individuals are always situated and hence implicated in historical structures, calling for engaged intellectuals.
• His later work, such as Critique of Dialectical Reason, sought to synthesize existential freedom with Marxist analysis of class and institutions, giving rise to existential Marxism.

Other thinkers, including Herbert Marcuse and Frantz Fanon, drew on existential motifs to critique:

• advanced industrial societies and one-dimensional conformity (Marcuse),
• colonialism, racism, and internalized oppression (Fanon), using existential phenomenology to analyze lived experience under domination.

These political appropriations emphasized that existential freedom operates within, and must respond to, social and material constraints.

Feminist Uses and Critiques

Feminist theorists found existential categories particularly useful for analyzing gendered oppression:

• Simone de Beauvoir’s The Second Sex applied notions of transcendence, immanence, and Otherness to women’s “situation,” arguing that woman is constructed as the Other in a male-dominated world.
• Beauvoir contended that women’s subordination cannot be explained by biology alone but results from social structures that restrict women’s projects and freedom.

Subsequent feminist thinkers used existential insights to explore:

• body, sexuality, and embodiment (sometimes in dialogue with Merleau-Ponty),
• the internalization of stereotypes and bad faith about gender roles,
• the tension between individual autonomy and collective struggle.

At the same time, some feminists criticized classical existentialism for:

• retaining androcentric assumptions,
• underestimating the role of structural power,
• privileging abstract freedom over intersecting oppressions (race, class, sexuality).

Nevertheless, existentialism helped provide a vocabulary for understanding oppression, objectification, and agency, and it remains a reference point in feminist ethics and political theory.

15. Critiques, Transformations, and the Move to Post-Structuralism

From the 1960s onward, existentialism faced sustained critique and reinterpretation, contributing to the rise of post-structuralism and related movements.

Structuralist and Post-Structuralist Critiques

Structuralist thinkers (e.g., Claude Lévi-Strauss) and later post-structuralists (Michel Foucault, Jacques Derrida) challenged key existential assumptions:

These critiques contributed to a shift from focusing on experience and intentional consciousness to analyzing language, discourse, and systems of signification.

Internal Revisions and Transformations

Some thinkers closely associated with existential phenomenology themselves reworked its categories:

• Levinas redirected focus from self’s authenticity to ethical responsibility for the Other, sometimes criticizing Heidegger’s prioritization of ontology.
• Ricoeur integrated existential themes into hermeneutics, emphasizing narrative identity and interpretation over pure description of experience.
• The Kyoto School combined existential questions with Buddhist notions of emptiness and non-self, thereby relativizing Western individualism.

These transformations preserved existential concerns with finitude and meaning while altering their conceptual framework.

Political and Feminist Re-evaluations

Marxist, feminist, and postcolonial theorists questioned existentialism’s adequacy for analyzing structural oppression:

• Some argued that its focus on personal choice risks individualizing systemic issues.
• Others pointed out that canonical existentialists often failed to address race, empire, and gender in depth.

Nonetheless, many of these critics continued to employ reworked existential concepts (e.g., alienation, Otherness, recognition) within broader critical theories.

Diffusion into Other Discourses

By the 1970s, existentialism had been:

• absorbed into psychotherapy, theology, literature, and popular culture,
• overshadowed in academic philosophy by analytic approaches, structuralism, and post-structuralism.

Rather than disappearing, existentialism was thus diffused and recontextualized, its vocabulary persisting even as its status as a distinct school declined.

16. Legacy and Historical Significance

The Existentialist Period left a multifaceted legacy across philosophy, theology, psychology, politics, and the arts.

Enduring Philosophical Contributions

Existentialism’s emphasis on lived experience, freedom, and finitude shaped later movements:

• Hermeneutics (e.g., Gadamer, Ricoeur) inherited concerns with historicity and understanding from existential phenomenology.
• Critical theory and post-structuralism reworked concepts like alienation, subjectivity, and power in light of structural and discursive analyses.
• In analytic philosophy, questions about personal identity, agency, and consciousness have been indirectly influenced by existential concerns with selfhood and first-person perspective.

Though many later thinkers rejected existentialism’s more humanistic or subject-centered formulations, they often retained its core problematics.

Impact on Theology and Ethics

In theology, existential ideas informed:

• neo-orthodox and existential theologies (Tillich, Bultmann),
• post-Holocaust reflections on suffering and divine absence,
• liberation theology, which linked existential oppression with structural injustice.

Ethically, existentialism contributed to debates about authenticity, responsibility, and moral ambiguity, providing tools for addressing dilemmas without absolute foundations.

Influence on Psychology and Everyday Discourse

Existential and humanistic psychotherapies embedded existential vocabulary—meaning, authenticity, anxiety, self-realization—in clinical and self-help discourses. Terms like “existential crisis” and “angst” entered everyday language, often detached from their original philosophical nuances but indicative of broad cultural resonance.

Political, Feminist, and Postcolonial Legacies

Feminist, critical race, and postcolonial theorists have continued to employ existential concepts (e.g., Otherness, recognition, lived experience) to articulate:

• gendered and racialized oppression,
• decolonial struggles and identity formation,
• the politics of embodiment and visibility.

While often critical of classical existentialism’s blind spots, these fields attest to its adaptive utility.

Historiographical Perspectives

Contemporary historians increasingly portray existentialism not as a monolithic doctrine but as a plural, historically situated response to crises of modernity—secularization, mass society, total war, and technological rationality. They highlight:

• internal diversity (religious vs. atheistic, literary vs. systematic),
• neglected figures and non-European currents,
• the movement’s role as a bridge between 19th-century Romantic/idealistic traditions and later 20th-century thought.

In this view, the historical significance of the Existentialist Period lies less in any single doctrine than in its sustained interrogation of what it means to exist as a finite, responsible being in a rapidly changing, and often disconcerting, modern world.