David Hume

1. Introduction

David Hume (1711–1776) is widely regarded as one of the central figures of early modern philosophy and a leading voice of the Scottish Enlightenment. His work is commonly associated with three overlapping commitments: empiricism, the view that all genuine content of thought ultimately derives from experience; skepticism, the deployment of critical doubt about traditional claims of reason, metaphysics, and religion; and naturalism, the effort to explain human thought and action in broadly the same observational, causal terms used in the natural sciences.

Hume’s own description of his project, especially in A Treatise of Human Nature and the later Enquiries, is the construction of a “science of man”. On this approach, questions about knowledge, selfhood, morality, politics, religion, and taste are to be grounded in a systematic account of human psychology. He analyzes the mind in terms of perceptions—distinguished as impressions and ideas—and explains belief, causal judgment, and moral evaluation via principles of association and sentiment rather than innate ideas or purely rational insight.

Interpreters frequently emphasize different facets of Hume’s philosophy:

Some scholars present Hume primarily as a destructive skeptic; others stress his constructive positive theories about mind, morals, and social institutions. A further line of interpretation highlights his role as a historian and essayist whose literary style and broad cultural influence matched, and at times exceeded, his strictly philosophical impact. Subsequent sections examine these aspects of his life and thought in more detail, following the structure of his major works and thematic contributions.

2. Life and Historical Context

Hume’s life unfolded against the backdrop of the 18th‑century Scottish Enlightenment, a period marked by rapid intellectual, commercial, and institutional change within the relatively new Kingdom of Great Britain (after the 1707 Union). He was born into the minor gentry near the Scottish Borders and spent much of his life between Edinburgh, London, and continental Europe, especially France.

Biographical Outline

Hume’s career opportunities were shaped by the Presbyterian religious establishment in Scotland and suspicion toward his open irreligion. His unsuccessful bids for academic posts at Edinburgh and Glasgow are often attributed, at least in part, to this religious climate. As a result, he earned his living in varied roles: tutor, judge‑advocate’s secretary, librarian to the Advocates Library, and later as a diplomatic secretary and chargé d’affaires in Paris.

Historically, Hume wrote at a time when Newtonian science, Lockean empiricism, and debates over religious toleration, party politics, and commerce were transforming British public life. His philosophical work engages with and reinterprets these currents: he adopts a Newton‑inspired ideal of systematic explanation, criticizes and extends Locke, and intervenes in Whig–Tory disputes over the English constitution and the legacy of the Civil War and Glorious Revolution.

Later interpreters often situate Hume as both a product and a critic of Enlightenment optimism: he shares its commitment to empirical inquiry and sociability yet raises searching doubts about reason’s power, the stability of the self, and the rational credentials of religion.

3. Early Years and Education

Hume was born on 7 May 1711 in Edinburgh and raised primarily at the family estate of Ninewells in Berwickshire after his father’s early death. His family background—minor landed gentry, with strong ties to the Scottish legal profession and Presbyterian culture—provided both educational opportunities and social expectations that he would pursue law or public office.

University of Edinburgh and Self‑Directed Study

Hume entered the University of Edinburgh around age twelve, a common age for Scottish universities at the time. He likely studied classics, logic, metaphysics, and natural philosophy, encountering Aristotelian scholasticism alongside newer Newtonian ideas. Surviving evidence suggests he did not take a formal degree, which was not unusual.

Dissatisfied with what he later characterized as sterile and obscure metaphysics, Hume turned instead to intensive private reading. He reports undergoing a youthful intellectual crisis, sometimes described in scholarship as his “philosophical conversion,” during which he formed the ambition to develop a new, empirically grounded “science of human nature.” His reading appears to have included works by Cicero, Montaigne, Malebranche, Locke, and Bayle, among others, though exact influences are partially reconstructed from later writings.

Abandonment of a Legal Career

Family expectations initially pointed Hume toward a career in law, but he found legal study uncongenial and left it aside. For a time he engaged in commercial training with a Bristol merchant, an experience he abandoned in favor of solitary study. This decision, coupled with his later remark that he was “seized very early with a passion for literature,” is often cited as evidence of his deliberate break from conventional professional paths.

Formation of Intellectual Aims

By his early twenties Hume had already sketched the project that would become the Treatise of Human Nature. He sought to apply the empirical, experimental spirit of natural philosophy to the mind itself, using observation and reflection rather than a priori speculation. The early years thus laid the psychological and methodological foundations for his later work, even though they produced no major publications and are only patchily documented in letters and memoirs.

4. Composition and Reception of the Treatise of Human Nature

Hume composed most of A Treatise of Human Nature during a period of retreat in France from 1734 to 1737, especially at La Flèche, home to a Jesuit college where Descartes had once studied. He describes himself there as living in “a kind of philosophical enthusiasm,” devoting himself almost entirely to study and writing.

Composition and Structure

The Treatise was conceived as a comprehensive work in three books:

Hume’s initial plan apparently included additional volumes on politics and criticism, but these were never completed in this form. The published Treatise is written in a dense, technical style, mixing psychological observation, conceptual analysis, and speculative argument. It lays out his theory of perceptions, account of causation and induction, bundle theory of the self, and sentimentalist moral theory, among other topics.

Immediate Reception

Upon its London publication (1739–1740), the Treatise attracted little public attention and some hostile reviews. Hume later wrote in “My Own Life” that it “fell dead‑born from the press.” Several factors have been proposed to explain this reception:

• The work’s abstract style and technical vocabulary, unusual for a young, unknown author.
• Its perceived irreligious implications, especially in its treatment of miracles, the soul, and moral foundations.
• Competition from more accessible philosophical works, including those by Francis Hutcheson and other moral sense theorists.

Later Reassessment and Scholarly Debate

Hume himself eventually distanced his mature reputation from the Treatise, preferring the later Enquiries as expressions of his views. Nonetheless, 19th‑ and 20th‑century philosophers came to regard the Treatise as his masterwork, central to discussions of empiricism, skepticism, and personal identity.

There is continuing scholarly debate about how to read the Treatise as a whole: some see it as an essentially skeptical project undermining traditional philosophy, others as a constructive naturalistic psychology with skeptical episodes, and still others as a unified but strategically complex work in which skeptical arguments serve a broader explanatory enterprise. These disagreements shape contemporary interpretations of nearly every major doctrine introduced in the Treatise.

5. Essays, Enquiries, and Popular Writings

Following the disappointing reception of the Treatise, Hume shifted toward shorter, more accessible forms. His essays and Enquiries played a crucial role in establishing his reputation during his lifetime.

Essays, Moral and Political and Related Collections

Beginning in 1741–1742, Hume published Essays, Moral and Political, later expanded and reorganized into Essays and Treatises on Several Subjects. These essays treat topics such as refinement in the arts, commercial society, political parties, and liberty. They are written in a polished, urbane style intended for the educated public rather than academic specialists.

The essays contributed significantly to Hume’s standing as a man of letters and a commentator on contemporary social and political issues. They also prefigure themes later developed in systematic form, including his views on commerce, constitutional balance, and religious toleration.

The Two Enquiries

Hume recast substantial parts of the Treatise into two more concise works:

These works simplify the argumentation, omit some of the more radical or technical sections of the Treatise, and include new material. Hume regarded the second Enquiry in particular as his best work. Many later readers first encountered his philosophy through these texts, contributing to ongoing debates about whether the Enquiries supersede or significantly revise the Treatise.

Other Popular Pieces

In addition to the essays and Enquiries, Hume authored shorter treatises and dissertations, such as “Of the Standard of Taste” and The Natural History of Religion (both 1757). These works address aesthetic judgment and the development of religion, respectively, and illustrate his broader application of the “science of man” to cultural phenomena. They also helped secure his public profile beyond strictly philosophical circles, especially among readers interested in taste, criticism, and the sociology of religion.

6. Historian of England and Public Intellectual

From the early 1750s Hume increasingly devoted himself to history and public affairs, culminating in his multi‑volume History of England and his roles in diplomacy and intellectual society.

The History of England

Between 1754 and 1762, Hume published The History of England, from the Invasion of Julius Cæsar to the Revolution in 1688 in several installments. Unlike many earlier chronicles, Hume’s history emphasizes political institutions, religious conflict, and the gradual development of the English constitution.

The work was commercially successful and made Hume famous; during the 18th and early 19th centuries he was often known primarily as “Hume the historian.” Politically, many contemporaries viewed him as Tory‑leaning or at least critical of Whig triumphalism, given his sympathetic portrayals of some royal figures and his skepticism toward party rhetoric. Later scholars debate whether this label oversimplifies his nuanced position, which combines admiration for mixed government with suspicion of faction.

Diplomatic and Social Roles

Hume’s growing reputation led to positions in public service. He served as secretary to General St. Clair on military and diplomatic missions and later as secretary to the British embassy in Paris (1763–1765). In Paris he was warmly received in salon culture, interacting with leading philosophes such as d’Alembert, Diderot, and d’Holbach.

He briefly acted as chargé d’affaires and later as Under‑Secretary of State in London (1767–1768). His public roles, combined with his controversial friendship and quarrel with Jean‑Jacques Rousseau, further enhanced his profile as a European intellectual figure.

Public Reputation

Hume’s historical work and visible government service fostered an image of him as both a practical statesman and a philosophical skeptic. While many admired his literary style and analytical rigor, religious critics denounced his perceived irreligion. This dual reputation—esteemed historian and suspected freethinker—shaped his contemporary influence and the conditions under which he published more sensitive philosophical material, often with caution or posthumously.

7. Core Philosophy: The “Science of Man”

Hume’s self‑described overarching project is the establishment of a “science of man” that would underpin all other areas of knowledge, including mathematics, natural philosophy, morals, politics, and criticism. This project is most explicitly announced in the Introduction to the Treatise and guides much of his later work.

Methodological Commitments

Hume proposes to study human nature using an “experimental method of reasoning”, modeled loosely on Newtonian science. Rather than deducing conclusions from innate ideas or metaphysical principles, he aims to:

• Observe mental phenomena (impressions, ideas, passions).
• Identify regularities and principles of association (resemblance, contiguity, cause and effect).
• Explain complex operations—belief, reasoning, moral judgment—by composition of these simpler elements.

He characterizes this approach as both empirical and naturalistic, treating the mind as part of the natural world subject to causal explanation.

Basic Framework of Human Nature

At the center of Hume’s “science of man” is his classification of perceptions into impressions (more vivid perceptions, including sensations and feelings) and ideas (faint copies of impressions). The copy principle—that every simple idea derives from a corresponding impression—serves as a test for meaningfulness and a tool for critiquing traditional metaphysical notions that cannot be traced to impressions.

Alongside these elements, Hume emphasizes:

• Custom or habit as the basis of inductive and causal reasoning.
• Passions and sentiments as the source of motivation and moral evaluation.
• Sympathy as a mechanism through which we share and respond to others’ feelings.

Scope of the Project

Hume envisages his science of man as foundational:

Interpreters debate how unified this project is. Some argue that Hume offers a coherent positive science of human nature with broadly stable principles; others see deep internal tensions, especially between his skeptical arguments and his reliance on natural belief and custom. Nonetheless, the “science of man” provides the organizing framework within which his metaphysics, epistemology, ethics, political theory, and aesthetics are developed.

8. Metaphysics and Philosophy of Mind

Hume’s metaphysics and philosophy of mind focus on the analysis of perceptions, the nature of the self, and the status of substance, necessary connection, and other traditional metaphysical notions. He often approaches these topics through critical examination of our ideas and the impressions from which they purportedly derive.

Theory of Perceptions and Mental Operations

Hume divides all mental contents into impressions and ideas, distinguished primarily by their vivacity. Simple ideas are copied from simple impressions, while complex ideas are formed by combining, augmenting, or diminishing these simpler components. Association of ideas—by resemblance, contiguity, and cause or effect—explains the flow of thought without invoking innate structures or rational insight into necessary relations.

This framework allows Hume to question whether many metaphysical notions (e.g., substance, material substratum, immaterial soul) correspond to any legitimate idea grounded in an impression. When no such impression can be identified, he suggests that the purported idea is confused or merely verbal.

The Self and Personal Identity

Hume famously advances a “bundle theory” of the self. When he introspects, he reports finding only a succession of particular perceptions—sensations, passions, thoughts—and “never” any impression of a simple, persisting self. From this he concludes that the self is “nothing but a bundle or collection of different perceptions” related by resemblance and causation and united by the imagination.

Scholars differ on how to interpret this claim:

The notorious “Appendix” to the Treatise records Hume’s dissatisfaction with his own account of personal identity, which has fueled extensive debate about whether his position is stable.

Metaphysical Commitments and Anti‑Metaphysics

Hume’s discussions of space and time, infinite divisibility, and external objects combine empiricist analysis with skeptical critique. He argues that our ideas of space and time arise from manner and order of impressions, raising puzzles about continuity and divisibility. Regarding the external world, he maintains that our belief in continued and distinct objects is not rationally justified but naturally generated by custom and imagination.

Some interpreters see Hume as broadly anti‑metaphysical, attempting to dissolve traditional ontological questions by exposing their psychological origins. Others attribute to him a more modest or “skeptical realist” metaphysics: while we cannot have a clear idea of necessary connections or substrata, we nonetheless naturally and ineliminably believe in a world of enduring objects and causal powers. The extent and nature of Hume’s metaphysical commitments remain a central topic in Hume scholarship.

9. Epistemology, Causation, and the Problem of Induction

Hume’s epistemology is closely tied to his analysis of causal inference and his formulation of what later came to be known as the problem of induction. He distinguishes sharply between what reason can establish with certainty and what we in fact believe and rely upon in everyday life and science.

Matters of Fact, Relations of Ideas, and Skeptical Challenges

Hume divides objects of knowledge into “relations of ideas” (necessary truths discoverable a priori, such as mathematics) and “matters of fact” (contingent truths about the world). While relations of ideas are certain but uninformative about existence, knowledge of matters of fact extends beyond present impressions only via causal reasoning.

He then asks how we justify inferences from past experience to future or unobserved cases. Hume argues that such inferences presuppose the uniformity of nature (that the future will resemble the past), but this principle itself cannot be demonstrated either by reason a priori or by experience without circularity. This is the core of his inductive skepticism.

Causation and Necessary Connection

Hume famously claims that we never perceive any necessary connection between events, only a constant conjunction of similar events (e.g., flame followed by heat) and the mind’s habit of expecting one after the other. As he puts it:

"

“Custom, then, is the great guide of human life.”

— David Hume, Enquiry concerning Human Understanding, V.i

Thus, for Hume, a cause is an object followed by another where objects of similar types are consistently conjoined, and where the first gives rise to an expectation of the second. The felt necessity is an internal psychological impression, not an observed power in external objects.

Interpretations of Hume on Causation

Scholars propose several readings:

Disputes center on textual evidence from the Treatise and Enquiry and how to reconcile Hume’s skeptical arguments with his reliance on causal reasoning in practice.

Response to Skepticism

Hume acknowledges that his arguments undermine any strictly rational justification for induction but notes that humans inevitably continue to rely on inductive habits. He portrays this as a natural, inescapable propensity rather than a conclusion of reason. Later philosophers, notably Kant, took Hume’s problem of induction as a central challenge, prompting alternative accounts of how causation and inductive practice can be legitimately grounded.

10. Moral Philosophy and Moral Psychology

Hume’s moral philosophy combines an account of moral judgment with a theory of motivation and the passions. He is widely seen as a leading proponent of moral sentimentalism, the view that moral distinctions are grounded in feeling rather than in pure reason.

Role of Sentiment in Morality

Hume argues that when we call actions or characters virtuous or vicious, we are expressing feelings of approval or disapproval that arise in a suitably informed and sympathetic observer. He maintains that reason alone, which discovers facts and relations, cannot by itself generate moral “oughts.” This is linked to his famous observation that authors often move illegitimately from “is” to “ought” without explaining the transition, later dubbed the “is–ought gap.”

In An Enquiry concerning the Principles of Morals, Hume emphasizes usefulness (utility) and agreeableness (to self and others) as central grounds of moral approbation. Virtues like justice, benevolence, and fidelity are praised because of their beneficial effects on social life and human welfare.

Passions, Reason, and Motivation

In his moral psychology, especially in Book II of the Treatise, Hume distinguishes calm and violent passions, direct and indirect passions, and examines the roles of pride, humility, love, hatred, and sympathy. He famously claims:

"

“Reason is, and ought only to be, the slave of the passions, and can never pretend to any other office than to serve and obey them.”

— David Hume, Treatise of Human Nature, II.iii.3

This thesis is typically read as asserting that motivation ultimately comes from passions or desires, while reason’s function is to inform and direct them by representing facts and causal relations. There is debate about how strong this claim is: some interpret Hume as denying any motivational role to reason; others see him as allowing that beliefs about moral norms can be motivating when tied to sentiments.

Artificial and Natural Virtues, Justice, and Convention

Hume distinguishes natural virtues (e.g., benevolence, generosity) from artificial virtues (e.g., justice, fidelity to promises) that arise from human conventions and social arrangements. His account of justice as a convention originating from scarcity and limited benevolence is often seen as a precursor to later theories of social contract and rule‑utilitarianism.

Scholarly discussions focus on whether Hume offers a consistent normative ethics (sometimes read as a proto‑utilitarianism) or primarily a descriptive moral psychology. Interpretations also diverge over the extent to which his sentimentalism allows for objective or intersubjective moral standards, given the variability of sentiments across persons and cultures.

11. Religion, Miracles, and Natural Theology

Hume’s writings on religion critically examine both revealed and natural religion, subjecting miracles, providence, and arguments for God’s existence to empirical and probabilistic scrutiny. These themes appear in the Enquiry concerning Human Understanding, The Natural History of Religion, and the posthumous Dialogues concerning Natural Religion.

Miracles and Testimony

In Section X of the Enquiry, “Of Miracles,” Hume defines a miracle as a violation of the laws of nature and argues that the evidence for any such event, based on human testimony, will always be outweighed by the evidence for the uniformity of nature:

"

“A wise man, therefore, proportions his belief to the evidence.”

— David Hume, Enquiry concerning Human Understanding, X

He concludes that no reported miracle has ever been supported by testimony strong enough to make belief more reasonable than disbelief. Critics contend that Hume’s standards are unrealistically high or that his definition of miracles is question‑begging; defenders see his argument as an application of his general probabilistic and inductive framework.

Natural Theology and the Design Argument

In the Dialogues concerning Natural Religion, Hume presents a multi‑voiced debate over arguments from design, cosmological arguments, and the nature of God. Through characters such as Cleanthes, Philo, and Demea, he explores analogies between the world and human artifacts, the problem of evil, and the limits of human reason in inferring divine attributes.

The Dialogues do not present an explicit authorial conclusion, leading to divergent interpretations:

The problem of evil features prominently, challenging claims about a benevolent, omnipotent deity given the world’s suffering.

Natural History of Religion

In The Natural History of Religion, Hume offers a genealogical account of religious belief, portraying polytheism and theism as products of fear, hope, ignorance of causes, and social dynamics. He traces the evolution from polytheism to “true religion” and emphasizes the psychological and cultural factors that sustain religious practices.

Some readers view this as a primarily descriptive, anthropological study; others interpret it as part of a broader critique of religion, suggesting that religious belief is not grounded in evidence but in human passions and cognitive tendencies. Taken together, Hume’s writings on religion significantly shaped later philosophical discussions about faith, miracles, and the rationality of theism.

12. Politics, Economics, and Social Theory

Hume’s contributions to political thought, economics, and social theory appear mainly in his essays and in thematic passages of the History of England. He treats political institutions and economic practices as evolving human arrangements rather than expressions of timeless natural law or divine order.

Political Theory

Hume rejects both absolute monarchy and simplistic contractarian accounts of political obligation. In essays such as “Of the Original Contract,” he questions the historical plausibility of a single founding contract while acknowledging the usefulness of contract language in justifying government. He emphasizes:

• The importance of established authority and convention for social stability.
• A preference for mixed government and balanced constitutions, with checks among branches.
• The dangers of faction and party spirit, which he analyzes in terms of historical conflicts between Whigs and Tories.

Interpreters disagree about Hume’s ideological alignment: some describe him as a conservative Whig or skeptical Tory; others see him as a moderate advocate of commercial, liberal society without strict party allegiance.

Economic Thought

In essays such as “Of Commerce,” “Of Money,” and “Of the Balance of Trade,” Hume develops views that later economists associated with classical political economy. He argues that:

• Commerce and industry promote politeness, knowledge, and liberty.
• An increase of money can temporarily stimulate industry but does not change real wealth in the long run.
• The specie‑flow mechanism tends to correct trade imbalances under an international gold standard.

These analyses influenced later economists, including Adam Smith, and are often seen as early statements of monetary theory and critiques of mercantilism. Some scholars emphasize tensions between Hume’s enthusiasm for commercial progress and his concerns about luxury and moral corruption.

Social and Historical Analysis

Hume’s political and economic ideas are integrated into a wider social theory that considers the role of manners, religion, and historical contingency in shaping institutions. In both essays and the History, he explores:

• How religious factions affect civil authority.
• The historical emergence of rule of law and parliamentary sovereignty.
• The interplay between economic development and civil liberty.

His approach is characteristically genealogical and comparative, seeking to explain current institutions through historical processes rather than appeal to a priori principles. This has led some commentators to depict Hume as a forerunner of later historical sociology and institutional economics, while others stress his normative commitments to stability, moderation, and constitutional government.

13. Aesthetics and the Standard of Taste

Hume’s most influential contribution to aesthetics appears in the essay “Of the Standard of Taste” (1757), supplemented by other essays on the fine arts and criticism. He seeks to reconcile the apparent subjectivity of aesthetic sentiment with the widespread practice of making comparative judgments about artistic value.

Sentiment and Beauty

Hume begins from the premise that beauty is “no quality in things themselves” but exists in the mind that contemplates them. Aesthetic judgments are expressions of pleasure or displeasure experienced by observers. This suggests a form of subjectivism: different observers may legitimately respond differently to the same work.

However, Hume notes that people commonly distinguish between good and bad taste and recognize certain works as classics. He aims to explain how such judgments can be more than mere personal preference.

The Standard of Taste

Hume proposes that a “standard” can be found in the joint verdict of “true judges” or “ideal critics”, characterized by:

• Delicacy of taste: refined sensitivity to subtle features.
• Practice: extensive experience with a wide range of works.
• Comparison: ability to contrast and evaluate different styles and genres.
• Freedom from prejudice: relative independence from personal or cultural biases.
• Good sense: capacity for reasoning about coherence and design.

According to Hume, when such critics, under favorable conditions, agree in their evaluations, their consensus provides a normative standard for aesthetic judgment, even though individual sentiments remain the underlying basis.

Tensions and Interpretations

Analysts of Hume’s aesthetics debate several issues:

Hume’s account has been influential in subsequent theories of aesthetic normativity, critical authority, and the relationship between subjective response and shared standards in the arts.

14. Relations with Contemporaries and the Scottish Enlightenment

Hume was a central participant in the Scottish Enlightenment, a network of thinkers in 18th‑century Scotland engaged in philosophy, history, economics, law, and science. His relationships with contemporaries were varied, ranging from close friendship and collaboration to controversy and suspicion.

Scottish Intellectual Milieu

Hume interacted with figures such as Adam Smith, Francis Hutcheson, Thomas Reid, Adam Ferguson, and William Robertson. These thinkers shared interests in:

• Moral philosophy and the nature of virtue.
• Political economy and commercial society.
• Historical explanation of social institutions.

While Hume’s religious skepticism set him apart and sometimes hindered his academic prospects, he nonetheless participated in Edinburgh’s learned societies and informal clubs.

Friendships and Intellectual Influence

Hume’s friendship with Adam Smith is especially notable. Smith admired Hume’s essays and acknowledged his influence, particularly in moral psychology and historical method, though there remain debates about the precise extent and nature of this influence on Smith’s Theory of Moral Sentiments and Wealth of Nations. Hume likewise read and commented on the works of other Scottish Enlightenment figures, contributing to a shared discourse about sympathy, progress, and civil society.

At the same time, Thomas Reid and other “Common Sense” philosophers developed their views partly in response to Hume’s skepticism about perception, causation, and the self. Reid’s Inquiry explicitly targets what he sees as the unintended skeptical consequences of Hume’s empiricism, marking an important intra‑Scottish debate.

Continental and English Connections

Beyond Scotland, Hume had significant contact with French philosophes during his stay in Paris. He was well‑received in salon culture and corresponded with d’Alembert, Diderot, and others, contributing to cross‑Channel exchanges on religion, politics, and philosophy. The famous and fraught episode with Jean‑Jacques Rousseau—whom Hume helped bring to England before a public falling‑out—has been interpreted both as a clash of personalities and as symbolic of tensions between different strands of Enlightenment thought.

In England, Hume’s relations with Anglican clergy and conservative politicians were often strained by his reputation for irreligion, yet he also formed connections with literary figures and statesmen who appreciated his historical and political writings.

Overall, Hume is commonly situated as both a product of the Scottish Enlightenment—sharing its emphasis on empirical inquiry, social progress, and moderate reform—and as one of its most radical voices, especially regarding skepticism and religion. How central his influence was relative to other Scottish figures remains a matter of scholarly emphasis, but few dispute his importance in shaping the movement’s philosophical profile.

15. Legacy and Historical Significance

Hume’s legacy extends across philosophy, social science, historiography, and broader intellectual culture. His ideas have been interpreted, adopted, and criticized in diverse ways from the 18th century to the present.

Influence on Philosophy

In the late 18th century, Immanuel Kant famously credited Hume with awakening him from his “dogmatic slumber,” particularly through Hume’s analysis of causation and induction. Kant’s critical philosophy can be read as a systematic attempt to respond to Hume’s challenges while preserving the possibility of metaphysics and science.

In the 19th and 20th centuries, Hume’s empiricism and skepticism informed both British empiricist traditions and logical empiricism (e.g., in the Vienna Circle). Analytic philosophers have engaged extensively with Hume’s discussions of personal identity, causation, moral psychology, and practical reason, often treating him as a precursor to contemporary debates about naturalism and reductionism.

Impact on the Human and Social Sciences

Hume’s historical and social analyses influenced early historicism, sociology, and economics. His essays on commerce and politics anticipated themes developed by Adam Smith and later classical economists. His History of England shaped historical scholarship and public understanding of the English past well into the 19th century, despite later critiques of its biases and narrative strategies.

Modern disciplines such as cognitive science, evolutionary psychology, and behavioral economics sometimes cite Hume’s accounts of habit, bias, and sentiment as early insights into psychologically grounded explanations of belief and decision‑making.

Continuing Debates and Re‑Evaluations

Contemporary scholarship assesses Hume’s legacy in varied and sometimes conflicting ways:

Recent discussions also address Hume’s views on race, gender, and empire, especially a notorious footnote in which he expressed racist opinions about non‑white peoples. Some institutions have re‑evaluated honors and naming practices in light of this passage, while scholars debate how it should figure in assessments of his overall work.

Despite such controversies, Hume remains a central reference point in philosophical curricula and research. His combination of empirical scrutiny, psychological explanation, and literary clarity continues to shape discussions about what philosophy can and should be, ensuring his enduring historical significance.