consciousness

1. Introduction

Consciousness is most commonly understood as the subjective, first‑person aspect of mental life: the presence of experience, awareness, or “what it is like” for an organism or system. The term also covers a family of related notions, including wakefulness, self-awareness, and reflective knowledge of one’s own mental states. Philosophical and scientific debates typically proceed by clarifying which of these notions is at stake and how they interrelate.

Across historical periods and traditions, consciousness has functioned as a focal point for questions about mind, reality, and selfhood. Early modern philosophers used it to ground knowledge and personal identity. Idealist and phenomenological thinkers treated it as the structural field within which objects and worlds appear. Contemporary analytic philosophy distinguishes different kinds of consciousness to address explanatory and conceptual puzzles, while cognitive science and neuroscience investigate the biological and computational mechanisms associated with conscious states.

No single, universally accepted definition has emerged. Instead, theorists often employ working characterizations:

Disagreements concern whether these aspects form a unified phenomenon or only a loose cluster; whether consciousness can be explained in physical or functional terms; and how it relates to language, social interaction, and culture. This entry traces how the concept emerged, diversified, and is currently employed across philosophy, science, and wider discourse, highlighting convergences and persistent fault lines rather than endorsing any single approach.

2. Etymology and Linguistic Origins

The English term consciousness is built from conscious + -ness, an abstract noun-forming suffix. Conscious arrives in Early Modern English via Middle French conscient, from Latin conscius: con- (“with, together”) + scīre (“to know”). The literal sense is “knowing with” or “jointly knowing.”

In Latin, conscius and related noun conscientia usually referred to shared or inner knowledge, especially of one’s own deeds and guilt:

"

Conscientia mille testes (“Conscience is as good as a thousand witnesses”).
— Traditional Latin maxim

These terms did not function as a general label for subjective experience; such discussions fell under anima, mens, or spiritus. The English noun consciousness developed in the 17th century to denote a state or property of being conscious, increasingly detached from specifically moral connotations.

Cross-linguistically, cognate or neighboring terms carve the semantic field differently:

German Bewusstsein (from bewusst, “aware”) becomes the key term in Kantian and post-Kantian philosophy, while Selbstbewusstsein (“self-consciousness”) acquires distinct systematic importance. In French and Italian, the conflation of consciousness with moral conscience shapes interpretive challenges, since historical texts often do not sharply separate experiential, epistemic, and ethical dimensions. These etymological trajectories contribute to later conceptual ambiguities and to the difficulty of aligning terminologies across traditions.

3. Pre-Philosophical and Everyday Usage

Before the term consciousness acquired technical philosophical meaning, related expressions in everyday language referred primarily to practical and moral dimensions of human life. Several broad themes dominated pre-philosophical usage:

Wakefulness and Lucidity

In many vernaculars, to be “conscious” contrasted with being asleep, fainted, or delirious. Medical and lay discourse focused on the presence or absence of responsiveness:

Here, consciousness is a global condition of the organism, not a property of specific experiences.

Inner Witness and Moral Sense

Following Latin conscientia, pre-modern and early modern religious and moral discourses emphasized an inner witness that knows and judges one’s actions:

• Being “conscious of guilt” or “conscious of innocence”
• Speaking of a “troubled” or “clear” conscience

These usages blend epistemic self-knowledge with ethical evaluation, anticipating later tensions between consciousness and conscience.

Social and Legal Contexts

In law and everyday interaction, being “conscious” of something often meant being aware and accountable:

• A person is “conscious of the risks” when informed and thus responsible.
• “In all good conscience” signals sincerity and internal authorization.

Such contexts frame consciousness as knowledge that can be attested, denied, or shared, rather than as a mysterious inner phenomenon.

Absence of a Unified Concept

Pre-philosophical vocabularies typically lacked a single term that grouped together:

• Wakefulness,
• Subjective experience,
• Reflexive self-awareness.

Instead, various words—“soul,” “spirit,” “heart,” “mind,” “awareness,” “conscience”—covered overlapping territories. Historians note that everyday talk of being “aware,” “awake,” or “conscious of” something provided the raw materials from which later philosophical conceptions were abstracted, but did not yet posit a unified theoretical entity called “consciousness.”

4. Early Modern Crystallization of the Concept

The 17th and 18th centuries saw consciousness emerge as a distinct philosophical category in European thought. Several converging developments contributed to this crystallization.

From Moral Witness to Mental Transparency

English and French authors began extending older notions of conscience and conscience to cover awareness of mental states more generally. The term “consciousness” appears increasingly in psychological and epistemological contexts, signifying a subject’s immediate access to its own thoughts and perceptions.

René Descartes’s emphasis on the indubitable awareness a thinking thing has of its own cogitationes provided an important, though mostly noun-less, template. His famous formulation

"

“I am, I exist, is necessarily true every time it is uttered by me or conceived in my mind.”
— Descartes, Meditations on First Philosophy, II

presupposes a tight link between thinking and being-aware-of-thinking, even though Descartes typically speaks of “thought” (cogitatio) rather than “consciousness” as an abstract property.

Locke’s Explicit Definition

John Locke is widely cited as giving the first systematic philosophical definition of consciousness:

"

“Consciousness is the perception of what passes in a man’s own mind.”
— Locke, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, II.i.19

Locke’s move is pivotal because:

This reorients debates from an external, moral “conscience” to an internal, experiential awareness.

Systematization in Early Modern Debates

Subsequent early modern thinkers, both rationalist and empiricist, adopted and adapted the term. Discussions of clear and distinct perception, apperception, and reflection were increasingly interpreted through the lens of consciousness. The concept became a central pivot in disputes about:

• The nature of the self,
• The possibility of innate ideas,
• The foundations of knowledge.

By the late 18th century, consciousness had become a key organizing notion for theories of mind, setting the stage for Kant, idealism, and later phenomenology.

5. Consciousness in Rationalism and Empiricism

Within early modern philosophy, rationalist and empiricist traditions both foregrounded consciousness but integrated it into their systems in distinct ways.

Rationalist Approaches

Rationalists such as Descartes, Leibniz, and Spinoza tied consciousness to thought and reason.

• Descartes treated mental states as essentially conscious; a thinking substance is directly aware of its thoughts. He relied on this transparency to ground certainty about the self and its ideas.
• Leibniz distinguished between perception and apperception (conscious perception), allowing for “petite perceptions” that remain below the threshold of awareness. Consciousness, on this view, is a higher-order clarification within a more extensive, partly unconscious mental life.
• Spinoza conceived mind and body as parallel attributes of a single substance; consciousness arises as ideas of ideas, that is, a mind’s awareness of its own states.

Rationalist accounts typically emphasize structural or logical features—clarity, distinctness, order—over sensory origins.

Empiricist Approaches

Empiricist thinkers, especially Locke and Hume, foreground experience and observation, including inner observation.

• Locke identified consciousness as the perception of what passes in one’s own mind, treating it as a form of internal sense or reflection. Consciousness supplies the data from which ideas of self and personal identity are constructed.
• Hume portrayed the mind as a bundle of perceptions and treated introspective awareness as one more stream of impressions and ideas. He argued that no underlying self is ever encountered beyond this flow of conscious contents.

For empiricists, consciousness is a source of evidence and a criterion for real mental states, but it does not necessarily reveal a substantial self.

Comparative Emphases

Both traditions helped consolidate consciousness as a central topic while sowing early seeds of later debates about the unconscious, selfhood, and the reliability of introspection.

6. Transcendental and Idealist Accounts

In German transcendental and idealist philosophy, Bewusstsein (consciousness) becomes the key to understanding not only mind but also knowledge and, in some versions, reality itself.

Kant: Transcendental Apperception

Immanuel Kant distinguishes ordinary consciousness from “the transcendental unity of apperception”:

"

“The ‘I think’ must be able to accompany all my representations.”
— Kant, Critique of Pure Reason, B131–132

This transcendental apperception is not a particular experience but a formal condition: the unified self-consciousness that makes objective experience possible. Key features include:

For Kant, consciousness at this level is a structuring function, not an object among others.

Post-Kantian Idealism

Later idealists radicalize and transform Kant’s insights.

• Fichte develops a notion of the self-positing “I”, where consciousness actively posits both itself and the not-I. Selbstbewusstsein (self-consciousness) is not derivative but originary.
• Hegel treats consciousness as a historically developing process. In the Phenomenology of Spirit, individual consciousness passes through stages (sense-certainty, perception, understanding) toward self-consciousness, reason, and ultimately Spirit (Geist). Consciousness is both individual and socio-historical.
• Other idealists (e.g., Schelling) explore consciousness in relation to nature and absolute identity, often attributing a kind of proto-consciousness or striving to nature itself.

Structural and World-Relational Emphasis

Idealist accounts generally:

• Stress the reflexive character of consciousness (its awareness of itself).
• Treat consciousness as constitutive of objectivity or worldhood.
• Blur sharp boundaries between individual and collective or absolute consciousness.

These developments shift the focus from consciousness as a psychological state to consciousness as a normative, logical, or historical structure, framing later phenomenological and hermeneutic investigations.

7. Phenomenological Conceptions of Consciousness

Phenomenology, inaugurated by Edmund Husserl and developed by later thinkers, approaches consciousness by describing its structures as they are lived from the first-person perspective, while bracketing questions of metaphysical explanation.

Husserl: Intentionality and the Stream of Consciousness

For Husserl, consciousness is essentially intentional:

"

“Every consciousness is consciousness of something.”
— Husserl, Ideas I, §84

Key elements of his conception include:

Consciousness thus is not a container of inner objects but the dynamic correlation between experiencing and what is experienced.

Existential and Embodied Phenomenology

Later phenomenologists reinterpret consciousness in more concrete, worldly terms.

• Heidegger shifts from Husserl’s focus on consciousness to Dasein, emphasizing being-in-the-world and practical engagement.
• Merleau-Ponty underscores the embodied nature of consciousness; perception is rooted in the lived body, and consciousness is not a detached observer but an incarnate point of view.
• Sartre characterizes consciousness as nothingness—a non-substantial, self-transcending revealing of being—and distinguishes pre-reflective consciousness (implicit self-awareness in all experience) from reflective self-consciousness.

Common Phenomenological Themes

Across different phenomenological schools, consciousness is:

• Non-substantial: not a thing but an activity or relation.
• World-involving: always already situated, directed, and meaningful.
• Structurally analyzable: describable in terms of horizon, embodiment, intersubjectivity, and temporality.

These conceptions influenced later discussions of subjectivity, perception, and the qualitative character of experience, while intentionally suspending many explanatory ambitions of naturalistic psychology and neuroscience.

8. Analytic Philosophy and the Hard Problem

Within analytic philosophy, consciousness has been approached through logical analysis, philosophy of language, and philosophy of mind, leading to influential distinctions and debates.

Phenomenal vs. Access Consciousness

Ned Block introduced a widely discussed distinction:

Some theorists treat these as tightly linked; others argue they can come apart (e.g., in cases of overflow where more is experienced than can be reported).

The Hard Problem

David Chalmers distinguished between “easy” and “hard” problems of consciousness:

"

“The really hard problem of consciousness is the problem of experience.”
— Chalmers, The Conscious Mind (1996)

• Easy problems: explaining cognitive functions (discrimination, integration, report).
• Hard problem: explaining why and how physical processes give rise to subjective experience at all.

Responses include:

• Physicalist reductions (e.g., higher-order thought theories, representationalism, global workspace theories) that aim to explain phenomenal consciousness in functional or neural terms.
• Non-reductive views (property dualism, panpsychism) that posit consciousness as a fundamental or ubiquitous feature of reality.
• Illusionist positions that argue phenomenal consciousness, as ordinarily conceived, is a cognitive or introspective illusion.

Conceptual Debates

Analytic work also probes:

• The coherence of qualia as intrinsic, ineffable properties.
• The reliability of introspection.
• Thought experiments (zombies, inverted spectra, Mary the color scientist) used to test physicalist accounts.

These discussions have shaped much contemporary terminology and interact closely with empirical research on attention, report, and neural correlates, while remaining divided over whether explanatory gaps are merely temporary or principled.

9. Conceptual Distinctions and Taxonomies

To navigate the complexity of “consciousness,” philosophers and scientists employ a range of distinctions and classificatory schemes.

Creature vs. State Consciousness

• Creature consciousness: whether a being is conscious at all (e.g., awake vs. comatose).
• State consciousness: whether a particular mental state is conscious (e.g., a conscious vs. subliminal perception).

These notions allow for unconscious states in a conscious creature and, in some clinical cases, residual states in minimally conscious individuals.

Phenomenal, Access, and Reflective/Mental-State Types

Common taxonomies include:

Some theorists add monitoring, self-conscious, or narrative consciousness for further granularity.

Transitive vs. Intransitive Uses

• Transitive: “S is conscious of X” (object-directed awareness).
• Intransitive: “S is conscious” (global condition).

Discussions often hinge on whether intransitive consciousness can be reduced to a pattern of transitive consciousness-of-something.

Levels and Contents

Empirical and theoretical frameworks also differentiate:

• Levels of consciousness: degrees of wakefulness or arousal (coma, sleep, sedation, full alertness).
• Contents of consciousness: specific experiences, thoughts, or feelings present at a time.

Mapping levels to contents is central in clinical assessment and in experimental paradigms (e.g., masking, binocular rivalry).

Taxonomic Disputes

Some authors argue that many proposed distinctions (e.g., phenomenal vs. access) track genuine kinds, while others view them as conceptual artifacts of language and methodology. There is also disagreement over whether “consciousness” picks out a single natural kind or a cluster concept held together by overlapping similarities.

10. Consciousness, Selfhood, and Personal Identity

Consciousness has long been intertwined with questions about who we are and what makes us the same person over time.

Consciousness and the Sense of Self

Many theories link consciousness to selfhood:

Some accounts hold that every conscious state involves an implicit for-me-ness, while others reserve self-consciousness for explicit reflection on oneself.

Personal Identity Over Time

Locke’s influential view ties personal identity to continuity of consciousness:

"

“…as far as this consciousness can be extended backwards to any past action or thought, so far reaches the identity of that person.”
— Locke, Essay, II.xxvii.9

This suggests that being the same person depends on psychological continuity (especially memory), not on sameness of substance (soul or body). Later thinkers have refined or criticized this approach:

• Some stress overlapping chains of memory and character rather than direct recall.
• Others point to problems such as fission (one person splitting into two) and amnesia, questioning whether consciousness continuity alone can ground identity.

Self-Consciousness and Social Recognition

In Hegelian and related traditions, self-consciousness is inherently intersubjective: a subject becomes fully self-conscious only through recognition by others. This connects consciousness and selfhood to social structures, power relations, and norms.

Debates on the Necessity of Consciousness for Personhood

Philosophers diverge on whether consciousness is necessary for being a person:

• Some argue that personhood requires present or potential self-consciousness (e.g., higher cognitive capacities).
• Others adopt broader criteria, emphasizing embodiment, relations, or membership in a moral community, even when consciousness is absent or impaired.

These disputes shape ethical discussions about identity in cases of dementia, coma, and prospective technologies that might alter or distribute consciousness.

11. Consciousness in Cognitive Science and Neuroscience

Cognitive science and neuroscience investigate consciousness as a natural phenomenon correlated with information processing and brain activity, using behavioral, neurophysiological, and computational tools.

Neural Correlates of Consciousness (NCC)

A major research program seeks minimal neural mechanisms that systematically covary with specific conscious experiences.

Debate persists about whether identified correlates are causal bases, prerequisites, or merely accompaniments of consciousness.

Cognitive and Computational Theories

Several influential models connect consciousness to information processing:

• Global Workspace Theory (GWT): Conscious contents are those broadcast globally to multiple specialized systems for flexible use.
• Higher-Order Thought (HOT) theories: A mental state becomes conscious when represented by a suitable meta-representational state.
• Integrated Information Theory (IIT): Consciousness corresponds to the degree and structure of integrated information (quantified as Φ) in a system.
• Recurrent Processing theories: Emphasize feedback loops within and between cortical areas as key to conscious perception.

Proponents argue these accounts bridge subjective reports with measurable processes; critics question their scope, testability, or alignment with phenomenology.

Experimental Paradigms and Clinical Assessment

Methods include:

• Masking, binocular rivalry, inattentional blindness to dissociate processing with and without awareness.
• Neuroimaging and electrophysiology to track temporal dynamics and network configurations.
• Clinical tools (e.g., the Glasgow Coma Scale, Coma Recovery Scale) and advanced imaging to assess residual consciousness in disorders of consciousness.

While many findings converge on the importance of distributed cortical networks and certain temporal patterns, there remains no consensus on a single definitive neural or computational signature of consciousness.

12. Moral, Political, and Social Uses of the Term

Outside technical philosophy and science, consciousness functions as a powerful metaphor and organizing concept in moral, political, and social discourse.

Moral Consciousness and Conscience

Building on the heritage of conscientia, many traditions speak of:

• Moral consciousness: awareness of right and wrong, duty, or responsibility.
• Conscience: an inner voice or tribunal that evaluates one’s actions.

Ethical theories differ on whether conscience reflects universal moral law, culturally shaped norms, or individual affective responses. Some religious contexts see heightened “spiritual consciousness” as attunement to divine commands or cosmic order.

Political and Class Consciousness

In political theory and social movements, consciousness marks awareness of structural conditions:

"

“Class consciousness” refers to the awareness of one’s position in economic and power relations and the interests associated with that position.

Marxist and neo-Marxist traditions highlight:

Similar notions include racial consciousness, feminist consciousness, and national consciousness, often associated with processes of conscientization or raising consciousness through education and activism.

Social and Cultural Self-Awareness

Sociology and cultural criticism speak of:

• Collective consciousness (e.g., Durkheim): shared beliefs and sentiments that integrate a society.
• Cultural consciousness: awareness of traditions, histories, or identities.
• Historical consciousness: sense of temporal location and relation to the past.

These uses conceptualize consciousness as a collective, often discursive phenomenon, not limited to individual subjectivity.

Normative Dimensions

Moral and political uses of “consciousness” usually carry evaluative weight: being “more conscious” is associated with greater insight, authenticity, or justice. Critics note that this can function rhetorically to legitimize particular ideologies, while defenders see it as naming genuine processes of emancipatory awareness.

13. Cross-Linguistic and Cross-Cultural Perspectives

Concepts analogous to “consciousness” appear across cultures but are shaped by distinct linguistic, metaphysical, and religious frameworks.

Varied Lexical Fields

Many languages lack a single term exactly equivalent to modern philosophical consciousness. Instead, they distribute relevant meanings across words for mind, heart, spirit, awareness, and life-force.

These conceptual ecologies complicate direct translation and suggest alternative ontological and ethical emphases.

Religious and Philosophical Contexts

Different traditions embed consciousness in broader cosmological schemes:

• In many Indian philosophies (Advaita Vedānta, some Buddhist schools), pure consciousness (cit, vijñāna) is fundamental, sometimes ultimate reality, sometimes a stream conditioned by karma.
• Buddhist thought distinguishes various kinds of consciousness (e.g., sense consciousnesses, storehouse consciousness in Yogācāra) and often emphasizes their impermanence and non-self character.
• In Daoist and some Confucian contexts, the focus falls on harmonizing heart-mind (xin) with the Dao or with social-ethical orders rather than isolating consciousness as a theoretical entity.
• Indigenous worldviews may attribute varying degrees of awareness or subjectivity to animals, plants, and landscapes, embedding consciousness in relational ontologies.

Contemporary Cross-Cultural Studies

Anthropologists and cross-cultural psychologists investigate how people in different societies:

• Conceptualize inner life.
• Distinguish between waking, dreaming, and trance.
• Attribute awareness to non-human agents (spirits, ancestors, technologies).

Findings suggest both substantial overlaps (e.g., recognition of wakefulness vs. unconsciousness) and important divergences in how experience, self, and world are parsed, cautioning against uncritical export of Euro-American theoretical categories.

14. Translation Challenges and Philological Issues

Historical and cross-linguistic work on consciousness faces significant translation and interpretive difficulties.

Shifting Semantic Fields

Terms that are now often rendered as “consciousness” originally carried different primary senses:

Translators must decide whether to preserve historical nuance or harmonize terminology across periods.

Retrojection of Modern Concepts

Scholars warn against retrojecting the modern, unified notion of consciousness into earlier texts where no such single abstraction existed. For example:

• Medieval discussions of soul, intellect, and will may address aspects now grouped under “consciousness” without endorsing a unified faculty.
• Early modern authors sometimes speak of “reflection,” “sense,” or “apperception” rather than a general “consciousness,” raising questions about how to map these onto contemporary categories.

Philological analysis often reveals layered meanings that resist straightforward alignment.

Cross-Tradition Equivalences

In comparative philosophy and religious studies, mapping terms such as citta, vijñāna, xin, nafs, rūḥ, mind, spirit onto “consciousness” can obscure local distinctions between:

• Cognitive vs. affective functions,
• Individual vs. cosmic principles,
• Ordinary vs. purified or enlightened states.

Some scholars prefer transliteration plus explanation over direct translation; others adopt “consciousness” as a bridge concept while acknowledging distortions.

Interplay of Science and Vernacular

Modern scientific discourse both draws on and reshapes everyday language. For instance, “awareness,” “attention,” “reportability,” and “subjectivity” function differently in technical vs. lay contexts. Translating between these registers—within a single language and across languages—raises issues of terminological alignment, especially when experimental paradigms rely on self-report framed in particular vocabularies.

Overall, translation and philological work indicate that “consciousness” is not a simple lexical item but a historically layered, cross-linguistically unstable construct, requiring careful contextualization.

15. Implications for Artificial and Animal Consciousness

The concept of consciousness plays a central role in debates about non-human minds, including animals and artificial systems.

Criteria and Dimensions

Theorists propose various criteria for attributing consciousness:

Disagreements concern which markers are necessary or sufficient, and whether some are anthropocentric.

Animal Consciousness

Empirical research on mammals, birds, cephalopods, and other taxa examines:

• Evidence of perceptual awareness (e.g., blindsight-like phenomena).
• Metacognition (e.g., uncertainty monitoring in primates).
• Indicators of pain and affective states.

Declarations such as the Cambridge Declaration on Consciousness (2012) assert, on neurobiological grounds, that many non-human animals possess substrates of consciousness. Critics question the extrapolation from human neuroanatomy and emphasize methodological challenges in inferring subjective states.

Artificial and Machine Consciousness

In AI and robotics, debates focus on whether and under what conditions artificial systems might be conscious.

• Some argue that sufficiently sophisticated functional organization (e.g., implementing a global workspace or integrated information structure) could suffice, independently of biological substrate.
• Others maintain that biological or specific dynamical properties are essential, or that current AI systems lack key features (e.g., unified embodiment, self-modeling, or affective grounding).
• Skeptical views hold that talk of artificial consciousness is speculative or conceptually confused, especially given disagreements about human consciousness itself.

Ethical and Practical Implications

Attributions of consciousness to animals or machines have implications for:

• Moral status and welfare obligations.
• Regulation of research, industry, and deployment.
• Design of interfaces and explanations (e.g., whether to avoid anthropomorphic cues that might mislead users about machine consciousness).

Because accounts of what consciousness is remain contested, proposals about its extension to non-humans typically mirror underlying metaphysical and theoretical commitments.

16. Legacy and Historical Significance

The evolving concept of consciousness has left a substantial legacy across philosophy, science, and culture.

Shaping Theories of Mind and Knowledge

Historically, the rise of consciousness as a central category:

• Reoriented early modern philosophy from substance metaphysics toward questions of subjectivity and representation.
• Informed debates on skepticism, certainty, and the foundations of knowledge by foregrounding the role of first-person awareness.
• Underpinned later discussions of the unconscious, as theorists explored the limits of conscious access.

Influencing Scientific Research Programs

In psychology and neuroscience, consciousness has:

• Motivated the development, eclipse, and revival of introspective methods.
• Driven research into attention, working memory, and global brain dynamics.
• Provided a focal point for interdisciplinary collaboration and controversy, as well as for methodological reflections about the role of subjective report in science.

Even when sidelined (e.g., in behaviorism), the concept persisted as a problematic remainder prompting new approaches.

Cultural and Ethical Impact

Consciousness discourse has influenced:

• Legal and ethical frameworks around responsibility, competence, and end-of-life decisions.
• Social movements invoking consciousness-raising as a strategy for emancipation.
• Popular culture and spirituality, where altered or expanded consciousness are central themes.

The term’s spread beyond technical contexts has contributed both to its normative force and to ongoing ambiguity.

Continuing Centrality and Contestation

Despite recurrent predictions that consciousness would be explained away or dissolved into other concepts, it remains a central, if contested, node in contemporary thought. Its historical trajectory—from moral witness, to inner experience, to transcendental structure, to neural and computational target—illustrates how philosophical and scientific vocabularies co-evolve. The legacy of these shifts continues to shape current research agendas and conceptual debates, ensuring that consciousness remains a key reference point in inquiries about mind, self, and reality.