Joseph Achille Mbembe

1. Introduction

Achille Mbembe (Joseph Achille Mbembe, b. 1957) is a Cameroonian historian and political theorist whose work has become central to debates on postcolonialism, race, and contemporary forms of power. Trained as a historian of French colonial Africa, he is widely read in philosophy, political theory, anthropology, and cultural studies, especially for his analyses of how colonial logics endure within ostensibly postcolonial and democratic orders.

Mbembe’s thought is frequently associated with three interlinked notions: the postcolony, necropolitics, and planetary entanglement. Through these concepts he examines how sovereignty operates not only by organizing life but also by distributing death; how African and diasporic experiences illuminate global structures of domination; and how the human and non-human are bound together in asymmetrical, historically shaped interdependencies.

His work is often situated within postcolonial and decolonial thought, but it also engages and reworks European critical theory, notably Michel Foucault, Hannah Arendt, and Giorgio Agamben, as well as African and Caribbean figures such as Frantz Fanon and Aimé Césaire. Commentators therefore describe him variously as a postcolonial theorist, a critical historian of modernity, or a global political philosopher.

Mbembe’s writings, especially On the Postcolony, Necropolitics, Critique of Black Reason, and Politics of Enmity, have influenced debates on sovereignty, violence, race, borders, and democracy across disciplines and regions. Supporters view his concepts as providing powerful tools for understanding twenty‑first‑century politics, while critics question aspects of his method, his representations of Africa, or his proposals for a renewed universalism. This entry surveys his life, intellectual trajectory, main works, core ideas, and the disputes surrounding them.

2. Life and Historical Context

2.1 Early Life and Education

Mbembe was born on 1 July 1957 in Otélé, in Cameroon’s Centre Region, during the final years of French colonial rule and anti‑colonial insurgency. His formative years unfolded in a newly independent but politically turbulent Cameroon, marked by the suppression of nationalist movements and the consolidation of one‑party rule. Scholars often link this background to his long‑standing interest in violence, sovereignty, and the afterlives of empire.

He studied history and related disciplines at the University of Yaoundé before moving to France for doctoral training at the Université Paris 1 Panthéon‑Sorbonne, where he obtained his PhD in 1989 with a dissertation on colonial rule and resistance in Cameroon. This Franco‑African intellectual formation exposed him simultaneously to African nationalist thought, French historiography (including the Annales school), and emerging currents of poststructuralism.

2.2 Academic Career and Geographical Trajectory

Mbembe’s career spans Africa, Europe, and North America. He has held research or teaching positions in Cameroon, the Democratic Republic of Congo, France, the United States, and, from 2009, South Africa, where he joined the Wits Institute for Social and Economic Research (WISER) at the University of the Witwatersrand in Johannesburg. Johannesburg functions in his later work as both an empirical site and a conceptual laboratory for theorizing urban life, informality, and global entanglements.

2.3 Historical Contexts

Commentators typically distinguish several historical frames that shape his concerns:

3. Intellectual Development

3.1 From Colonial History to Political Theory

Mbembe’s early intellectual work, culminating in La Naissance du maquis dans le Sud‑Cameroun, 1920–1960, focused on French colonial administration and armed resistance in Cameroon. This phase emphasized archival research, institutional history, and the micropolitics of colonial domination. Analysts note that his later theoretical writings retain this attention to concrete practices of power, even as they move away from strictly national or chronological narratives.

3.2 Theorizing the Postcolony

During the 1990s, as he taught and researched in France and the United States and became active in CODESRIA networks, Mbembe shifted towards explicitly theoretical reflection. Essays later collected in On the Postcolony explore themes such as commandement (forms of authority), the body, and everyday life under postcolonial rule. He drew on Foucault, Georges Bataille, psychoanalysis, and African literature to argue that postcolonial power must be understood through its intimate, affective, and often carnivalesque dimensions, not only through institutional structures.

3.3 Global Sovereignty and Necropolitics

In the early 2000s, Mbembe broadened his focus beyond Africa to global configurations of war, occupation, and security. The essay “Necropolitics” (2003) marks this phase, in which he interrogates how sovereignty organizes death in colonial and postcolonial spaces, refugee camps, and occupied territories. Commentators identify this period as a decisive engagement with and reworking of European biopolitics debates.

3.4 Planetary and Racial Critique

From the 2010s, based mainly in Johannesburg, Mbembe developed a more expansive critique of race, capitalism, and planetary interdependence. Works such as Sortir de la grande nuit, Critique de la raison nègre, Politiques de l’inimitié, Out of the Dark Night, and Brutalisme elaborate notions of Black reason, politics of enmity, and planetary entanglement. Many interpreters read this as a move from diagnosing postcolonial conditions to articulating new forms of universalism, democracy, and ecological awareness grounded in African and diasporic experiences.

4. Major Works

4.1 Overview Table

4.2 Thematic Clusters

Commentators often group Mbembe’s corpus into thematic clusters:

• Colonial history and resistance: The Birth of the Maquis.
• Postcolony and everyday power: On the Postcolony and related essays.
• Sovereignty and necropolitics: the “Necropolitics” essay and subsequent elaborations.
• Decolonization and democracy: Sortir de la grande nuit and Out of the Dark Night.
• Race and Black reason: Critique of Black Reason.
• Borders, hostility, and security: Politics of Enmity.
• Planetary entanglement and brutalism: Brutalism and later essays.

Within each cluster, scholars trace both continuities—such as the persistent focus on colonial afterlives—and shifts, including an increasing engagement with environmental and digital dimensions of power.

5. Core Ideas and Concepts

5.1 The Postcolony

Mbembe uses postcolony to describe postcolonial African political formations in which colonial logics of command, extraction, and racialization persist in hybrid, often parodic forms. In On the Postcolony, he emphasizes the intimate entanglement between rulers and ruled, marked by violence, mutual complicity, and what he calls the “aesthetics of vulgarity.” The postcolony is thus neither a simple failure of modernization nor mere continuity with colonialism, but a specific configuration of power and subjectivity.

5.2 Necropolitics

The concept of necropolitics redefines sovereignty as the power to dictate who may live and who must die, extending beyond Foucault’s focus on the administration of life (biopolitics). Mbembe analyzes how certain spaces—colonies, occupied territories, prisons, and urban peripheries—become zones where populations are rendered killable or exposed to slow death.

"

“The ultimate expression of sovereignty resides, to a large degree, in the power and the capacity to dictate who may live and who must die.”

— Achille Mbembe, “Necropolitics”

5.3 Politics of Enmity

In politics of enmity, Mbembe describes contemporary regimes in which fear, security, and border control organize politics around the friend–enemy distinction rather than shared world‑making. He links this to neoliberal inequality, the war on terror, and the resurgence of racialized nationalism.

5.4 Critique of Black Reason and Blackness

Through Critique of Black Reason, Mbembe traces how “Blackness” has been constructed as an object of dehumanization and exploitation, but also as a standpoint from which modernity and capitalism can be critically re‑examined. Blackness functions both as a social condition and as a global structure of thought.

5.5 Planetary Entanglement and Brutalism

Planetary entanglement names the interconnectedness of humans, non‑humans, technology, and environments within historically unequal structures. Brutalism refers to contemporary forms of power that treat bodies and environments as raw material for extraction, producing hardness, exposure, and disposability. Together, these ideas extend his earlier focus on the postcolony and necropolitics into ecological and planetary registers.

6. Necropolitics and Sovereignty

6.1 Relation to Biopolitics

Mbembe’s notion of necropolitics enters into dialogue with Michel Foucault’s concept of biopolitics, which characterizes modern power as the administration and optimization of life. Mbembe argues that, particularly in colonial and postcolonial contexts, sovereignty often manifests less as the fostering of life than as the active production of death or conditions of “living death.” Commentators see this as both an extension and a critique of European‑centered theories of modern power.

6.2 Key Features of Necropolitical Sovereignty

In “Necropolitics,” Mbembe identifies several features of necropolitical power:

6.3 Empirical Sites

Mbembe draws examples from:

• Colonial conquest and forced labor regimes.
• Apartheid South Africa and occupied Palestine.
• Contemporary urban margins and refugee camps.

Scholars have extended the concept to analyze drone warfare, border regimes in the Mediterranean and U.S.–Mexico regions, and environmental sacrifice zones.

6.4 Scholarly Interpretations

Supporters view necropolitics as clarifying how sovereignty functions in situations where the state or other actors expose populations to premature death, such as pandemics, structural racism, or climate catastrophe. Some interpreters emphasize its contribution to international relations and security studies.

Critics raise several concerns: some argue that necropolitics overemphasizes spectacular violence at the expense of more mundane forms of governance; others contend that the term risks being applied so widely that it loses specificity. A further debate concerns whether Mbembe’s focus on death obscures possibilities for resistance and alternative forms of life, an issue he addresses more directly in later works on decolonization and planetary futures.

7. Race, Blackness, and Critique of Black Reason

7.1 Black Reason

In Critique of Black Reason, Mbembe reconstructs the history of what he calls Black reason: a set of discourses, images, and practices through which the figure of “the Black” has been produced in Western thought and global capitalism. He traces this from early modern slavery and colonialism through scientific racism and contemporary neoliberalism, arguing that Blackness has operated as both an object of devaluation and a foundational category for organizing the modern world.

7.2 Blackness as Condition and Perspective

Mbembe distinguishes between Blackness as a socio‑historical condition (enslavement, colonial rule, racial segregation) and Blackness as a vantage point for critiquing modernity. He suggests that experiences of dispossession, displacement, and racialization reveal the contradictions of liberal universalism and capitalism. Proponents see this dual perspective as aligning with, yet distinct from, traditions of Black Atlantic thought and Fanonian critique.

"

“Blackness is not simply a fact of skin or genealogy; it is a name given to a set of forces, narratives, and desires that have shaped the modern world.”

— Achille Mbembe, Critique of Black Reason

7.3 Relation to Other Racial Theories

Commentators note several convergences and tensions:

7.4 Universalism and the Human

A central, contested aspect of Mbembe’s project is his call for a renewed, decolonial universalism. He argues that, despite its violent history, the category of the human should not be abandoned but transformed in light of Black and colonial experiences. Critics question whether such a universalism can escape Eurocentric frames, while supporters view it as an attempt to rethink humanity from a standpoint historically excluded from it.

8. Methodology and Style of Inquiry

8.1 Interdisciplinary Method

Mbembe’s work is characteristically interdisciplinary, combining:

• Archival history: detailed use of colonial and postcolonial records, particularly in his early work.
• Philosophical and theoretical reflection: engagement with European critical theory, African and Caribbean thought, and political philosophy.
• Literary and cultural analysis: close readings of novels, popular culture, and visual representations, especially in On the Postcolony.
• Ethnographic sensitivity: attention to everyday practices, speech, and bodily gestures in African and global urban contexts.

Analysts often highlight this blend as a methodological innovation within political theory.

8.2 Style and Rhetoric

Mbembe’s prose is frequently described as dense, metaphorical, and sometimes baroque. He deploys images of the grotesque, carnivalesque, and erotic to capture the affective dimensions of power. Some readers view this as illuminating aspects of domination and complicity that more formal language misses; others find it obscure or overly aestheticized.

8.3 Use of Case Studies

Johannesburg and other African urban settings play a central role in his later work as empirical and conceptual sites. Rather than treating them as local exceptions, Mbembe presents them as laboratories for understanding global phenomena such as informality, precarity, and surveillance.

8.4 Relation to Theory Traditions

His methodology intersects with several traditions:

Critics occasionally argue that his sweeping theoretical syntheses risk flattening regional particularities or empirical complexity, while supporters see them as necessary to grasp global structures of power.

9. Impact on Philosophy and Critical Theory

9.1 Influence Across Disciplines

Mbembe’s concepts have traveled widely beyond African studies. In political philosophy, critical theory, and continental philosophy, “necropolitics” and “postcolony” are frequently used to analyze war, security regimes, and postcolonial states. Anthropologists and urban theorists draw on his work to interpret informal economies, urban marginality, and new subjectivities. Legal scholars and human rights theorists employ necropolitics to examine states of exception, policing, and mass incarceration.

9.2 Key Areas of Philosophical Influence

9.3 Reception in Different Regions

In Africa, Mbembe is read as part of broader debates on decolonization, democracy, and the role of universities. In Europe and North America, his work circulates primarily within critical theory, postcolonial studies, and race studies, sometimes detached from its African contexts. Latin American and Asian scholars have adopted and compared his ideas with decolonial and subaltern studies approaches, generating cross‑regional conversations about coloniality and modernity.

Interpretations of his influence vary. Some commentators regard his concepts as indispensable tools for understanding twenty‑first‑century power configurations; others argue that their prominence may overshadow alternative local or disciplinary frameworks. Nonetheless, Mbembe is widely acknowledged as a major contemporary reference point in global critical thought.

10. Debates, Criticisms, and Reception

10.1 Debates on Representation of Africa

Some African scholars contend that Mbembe’s depiction of the postcolony risks reproducing stereotypes of African politics as excessively violent or grotesque. They argue that his emphasis on vulgarity, spectacle, and complicity may understate everyday practices of negotiation, bureaucratic rationality, or ordinary ethics. Defenders respond that his work deliberately challenges reductive images of pure victimhood and foregrounds complex forms of agency.

10.2 Methodological and Theoretical Critiques

Critics have raised concerns about:

• Abstraction and generalization: The broad scope of concepts like necropolitics and brutalism is said by some to flatten differences between historical and regional contexts.
• Style and accessibility: His dense, metaphorical prose has been described as difficult to translate into policy or activist strategies.
• Engagement with African intellectual traditions: Some commentators suggest that his reliance on European theoretical references underplays earlier African theorists of the state, economy, and culture; others note his extensive engagement with African and Caribbean thinkers such as Fanon and Césaire.

10.3 Political Controversies

Mbembe has occasionally been at the center of political controversies, particularly around his public interventions on Israel–Palestine, decolonization, and racism. In some European contexts, opponents have accused him of anti‑Semitism or extremism; supportive scholars have rejected these charges as misreadings of his work on colonialism, occupation, and solidarity. These disputes have fueled broader debates over academic freedom, postcolonial critique, and the limits of public discourse.

10.4 Reception Within Black and Decolonial Thought

Within Black studies and decolonial theory, responses are mixed. Some Afro‑pessimist and decolonial thinkers argue that his call for a renewed universalism risks diluting the specificity of anti‑Black violence or colonial difference. Others view his effort to rearticulate the human and the universal from Black and colonial experiences as a crucial intervention.

Overall, the reception of Mbembe’s work is highly active and contested, with ongoing debates over its empirical adequacy, conceptual reach, and political implications.

11. Legacy and Historical Significance

Mbembe’s legacy is still unfolding, but several dimensions are widely noted in scholarly assessments.

11.1 Reorienting the Geography of Theory

Commentators highlight his role in repositioning Africa—and particularly African urban spaces—as central rather than peripheral to critical social and political theory. By treating the postcolony and Johannesburg as privileged sites for understanding global power, he has contributed to decentering Euro‑American experiences in theoretical debates.

11.2 Conceptual Innovations

Concepts such as postcolony, necropolitics, politics of enmity, Black reason, planetary entanglement, and brutalism have entered the vocabularies of multiple disciplines. They are used both as analytical tools and as points of departure for further critique and modification. Even critics who question aspects of these notions acknowledge their catalytic role in opening new lines of inquiry.

11.3 Influence on Generations of Scholars

Through his writings, teaching, and participation in networks like CODESRIA and WISER, Mbembe has influenced several generations of researchers in Africa and globally. His work is frequently cited in dissertations, curricula, and activist reflections on decolonization, race, and global justice.

11.4 Place in Intellectual History

Historians of ideas often situate Mbembe within a lineage that includes Fanon, Césaire, and other anticolonial thinkers, while also linking him to Foucault and contemporary critical theorists. Some see him as emblematic of a turn toward planetary perspectives that integrate colonial history, race, capitalism, and environmental crisis.

Future evaluations of his historical significance will likely consider how his concepts are adapted or contested in emerging debates on digital technologies, climate change, and shifting global power relations. Nonetheless, current scholarship broadly regards Mbembe as a major figure in late twentieth‑ and early twenty‑first‑century critical thought whose work has reshaped discussions of sovereignty, race, and decolonization.