Dorothee Steffensky-Sölle (née Nipperdey)

1. Introduction

Dorothee Steffensky-Sölle (née Nipperdey, 1929–2003), commonly cited as Dorothee Sölle, was a German Protestant theologian whose work helped define late‑20th‑century political theology, feminist theology, and post‑Holocaust philosophy of religion. Writing in the shadow of National Socialism and the Cold War, she became widely known for a radical critique of the traditional, omnipotent God and for insisting that Christian faith must be publicly accountable in struggles over war, capitalism, and patriarchy.

Sölle’s thought is often summarized in the formula that God “has no other hands than ours,” a slogan that encapsulates her view of divine action as non‑coercive and mediated through human responsibility. She associated this with a provocative “Christian atheism”, arguing that the “death” of a supernatural ruler‑God need not entail the death of faith but can open a path toward understanding God as the depth of solidarity, love, and resistance.

Her work spans systematic theology, ethics, spirituality, and poetry. It is marked by constant dialogue with liberation theology, Marxist critique, existentialism, and mystical traditions. For many readers, she offered a distinctive attempt to rethink God, suffering, and power “after Auschwitz,” combining rigorous critique with liturgical experimentation—most famously in the Cologne Political Night‑Prayers.

The following sections survey her life and historical context, trace the phases of her intellectual development, analyze her major works and central ideas, and outline the debates her theology has provoked as well as her ongoing influence in theology, religious studies, and adjacent fields of philosophy and political thought.

2. Life and Historical Context

2.1 Early Life in Nazi and Postwar Germany

Born in Cologne in 1929 into a liberal Protestant, anti‑Nazi family, Sölle’s childhood unfolded during the Third Reich and the devastation of World War II. Her father, legal historian Thomas Nipperdey, opposed National Socialism, which exposed her early to critical views of state ideology and church complicity. The destruction of Cologne, the Holocaust, and postwar material hardship formed the historical backdrop for her later insistence that theology must answer for its political effects.

2.2 Education and Postwar Intellectual Climate

From the late 1940s into the early 1950s, she studied theology, philosophy, and German literature in Cologne, Freiburg, and Göttingen. This period coincided with intense debates in West German universities over existentialism, dialectical theology, and demythologization after the collapse of Nazism. Thinkers such as Bultmann, Bonhoeffer, and Marx became key reference points as German intellectual life wrestled with guilt, reconstruction, and democratization.

2.3 1960s–1970s: Cold War, Student Movements, and Peace Activism

The Cold War, nuclear arms race, and the 1968 student protest movements shaped Sölle’s turn toward political theology. West German society faced conflicts over rearmament, emergency laws, and the Vietnam War. In this setting she co‑organized the Cologne Political Night‑Prayers (1967), bringing worship, political analysis, and street protest together. These liturgies reflected broader Christian engagement in anti‑war, anti‑authoritarian, and social justice movements across Europe and North America.

2.4 Transatlantic Setting and Late‑20th‑Century Debates

From 1975 to 1987 Sölle taught at Union Theological Seminary in New York, a hub for civil rights, Latin American liberation theology, and emerging feminist and Black theologies. Her work there unfolded amid U.S. debates over racism, imperialism, and second‑wave feminism, and during heightened tensions over Central America and nuclear weapons. Back in Germany, she remained active in the peace and environmental movements. The fall of the Berlin Wall (1989) and the transformations of global capitalism in the 1990s provided the context for her later reflections on consumerism, globalization, and mysticism as resistance.

3. Intellectual Development

3.1 Formative Years under National Socialism (1929–1954)

Sölle’s early experiences of fascism, war, and church silence oriented her toward a theology that would be historically self‑critical. During her university studies she encountered Kierkegaard’s existential subjectivity, Bultmann’s demythologization, and Bonhoeffer’s “religionless Christianity,” alongside early engagements with Marx. Proponents of this reading emphasize that these influences predisposed her to question authoritative metaphysical claims and to tie theology to ethical responsibility.

3.2 Existential-Theological and Literary Engagement (1954–1967)

While teaching and raising a family, Sölle wrote essays and poetry focused on guilt, meaning, and suffering in postwar Germany. She experimented with language that crossed boundaries between theology and literature, probing how religious symbols speak—or fail to speak—after Auschwitz. Many interpreters see this period as laying the groundwork for her later post‑theodicy stance, as she increasingly criticized images of a distant, omnipotent God.

3.3 Political Theology and Public Protest (1967–1975)

The founding of the Political Night‑Prayers marked a decisive shift toward political theology. In works like Stellvertretung (Suffering) and Atheismus im Christentum, she rejected classical omnipotence, advanced the notion of vicarious solidarity (Stellvertretung), and began speaking of “Christian atheism.” Scholars often identify this as her most confrontational phase, combining Marx‑inspired critique of religion with liturgical creativity.

3.4 Transatlantic Liberation and Feminist Turn (1975–1987)

At Union Theological Seminary, Sölle encountered Latin American liberation theologians, U.S. civil rights and peace activists, and feminist theologians. Her thought widened to integrate class, gender, race, and empire, and she sharpened her critique of patriarchy and economic exploitation. She also deepened her constructive reflection on creation, work, and ecological responsibility, moving beyond a solely European frame.

3.5 Mysticism, Poetics, and Mature Synthesis (1987–2003)

In her later phase, especially in Mystik und Widerstand, Sölle articulated “mysticism as resistance,” arguing that intimate experience of God empowers nonviolent struggle against consumerism and structural violence. Scholars describe this as a synthesis of her earlier emphases: a non‑omnipotent, co‑suffering God, political praxis, feminist critique, and a strong commitment to poetic, prayerful language.

4. Major Works and Themes

4.1 Overview of Key Works

4.2 Recurring Thematic Constellations

Across these works, several themes recur:

• God and Suffering: Especially in Stellvertretung and Leiden, she explores vicarious solidarity with victims, rejecting explanations of suffering that appeal to divine planning.
• Christian Atheism and Creation: In Atheismus im Christentum and To Work and To Love, she argues that the “death” of an interventionist God intensifies human responsibility for work, love, and the earth.
• Political Theology: Politische Theologie and her nuclear‑age writings examine how doctrines legitimize or contest war, capitalism, and state power, insisting that theology is never politically neutral.
• Feminist and Ecclesial Critique: Phantasie und Gehorsam and later essays challenge patriarchal church structures, contrasting mere obedience with imaginative, justice‑oriented discipleship.
• Mysticism and Praxis: In Mystik und Widerstand and The Silent Cry she links contemplative experience with resistance to consumerism and violence, framing mysticism as socially transformative rather than world‑denying.

Scholars note that these themes are not separate stages but interwoven, with political, feminist, and mystical motifs increasingly integrated over time.

5. Core Ideas: God, Suffering, and Power

5.1 Critique of Divine Omnipotence

Central to Sölle’s theology is a thoroughgoing critique of classical omnipotence. She contends that, after Auschwitz, belief in a God who could have prevented the Holocaust but did not renders God morally monstrous. She therefore rejects images of God as an all‑controlling ruler who ordains or tolerates evil for hidden purposes. Proponents argue that this stance aligns her with post‑Holocaust theology, process thought, and kenotic (self‑emptying) approaches to divine power.

5.2 God as Co‑Suffering and Non‑Coercive

In place of omnipotence, Sölle depicts God as vulnerable, co‑suffering love. God’s power is understood as persuasive, relational, and invitational, not coercive. The concept of Stellvertretung (vicarious representation) expresses God’s identification with the oppressed and serves as an ethical model: humans are called to share in the suffering of others, mirroring Christ’s solidarity. Critics contend that this may compromise God’s sovereignty or diminish divine otherness; supporters reply that it preserves God’s goodness and counters religious legitimation of violence.

5.3 Theodicy after Auschwitz

Sölle largely abandons traditional theodicy, arguing that attempts to justify God in the face of radical evil silence victims and sacralize suffering. Instead, she advocates an anti‑theodic stance: suffering should be resisted rather than explained. God, in this view, is not the cause of suffering but the source of protest and hope within it. Some interpreters see this as a reorientation from “Why does God allow?” to “Where is God in resistance?”

5.4 Human Responsibility and “Christian Atheism”

Her notion of “Christian atheism” maintains that atheistic critiques of a heavenly despot can purify faith. When the idol of an interventionist God “dies,” humans recognize that “God has no other hands than ours.” Divine action occurs through human agency, social movements, and structures of compassion. Advocates praise this for intensifying ethical responsibility; detractors worry that it collapses the distinction between God and human projects or risks ideological capture of God‑language.

6. Mysticism, Resistance, and Praxis

6.1 Mysticism Redefined

In Mystik und Widerstand and related works, Sölle reinterprets mysticism as a politically charged mode of perception rather than a private escape. Mysticism, for her, is the experience of reality as “filled with God” in a way that dissolves rigid ego‑boundaries and opens persons to others and to creation. She draws on Christian, Jewish, and sometimes non‑Christian mystical traditions, reading them through a liberationist lens.

6.2 From Contemplation to Resistance

Sölle argues that authentic mystical experience leads to resistance against injustice. Experiencing God in the depth of reality, she suggests, reveals the intolerability of violence, poverty, and ecological destruction. Thus, prayer and contemplation become sources of nonviolent courage and civil disobedience. Her own involvement in peace actions and the Political Night‑Prayers is often cited as an embodiment of this connection.

6.3 Praxis and Everyday Spirituality

Praxis, in Sölle’s usage, denotes embodied, communal action oriented toward transformation. She extends this beyond spectacular protests to include everyday practices of sharing, hospitality, and ecological care. Mysticism and praxis are mutually informing: inner transformation fuels action, while engagement with the oppressed deepens spiritual awareness. Some theologians embrace this as a model for liberation spirituality; others question whether political commitments may predetermine what counts as authentic mystical experience.

6.4 Liturgical Experimentation

The Cologne Political Night‑Prayers exemplify her fusion of mysticism and praxis: gatherings combined biblical readings, silence, contemporary analysis, and planning for protest. Supporters see these as innovative forms of “engaged liturgy”; critics have argued that they risk instrumentalizing worship for political agendas. Sölle maintains that liturgy is always political, whether it supports the status quo or challenges it.

7. Feminist and Liberationist Dimensions

7.1 Feminist Reinterpretation of God and Church

From the late 1960s onward, Sölle became a prominent voice in feminist theology, especially in Europe. In Phantasie und Gehorsam (Beyond Mere Obedience), she critiques images of God as patriarchal ruler and church structures that demand women’s passive obedience. She advocates for inclusive, relational God‑language and imagines the church as a community of mutuality rather than hierarchy. Proponents highlight her role in moving German Protestant theology toward gender awareness; some feminists, however, argue that she remained more focused on social than on specifically women’s issues.

7.2 Liberation Theology and Global Solidarity

Sölle’s time at Union Theological Seminary brought her into close contact with Latin American liberation theologians. She adopted liberation theology’s “preferential option for the poor” and analysis of structural sin, while re‑articulating these insights for a European context marked by affluence and Cold War politics. In her writings on the arms race and global capitalism, she stresses that Western Christianity must confront its complicity in systems that oppress the global South.

7.3 Intersection of Gender, Class, and Race

Her mature work emphasizes that oppression is intersectional, involving gender, class, race, and imperial power. She references Black and womanist theologies, and critics of colonialism, arguing that theology should be written “from below” and in dialogue with oppressed communities. Some scholars welcome this broadening of liberation theology; others observe that her primary standpoint remains that of a white European woman and that her engagement with non‑European voices, while sympathetic, is sometimes more appropriative than fully dialogical.

7.4 Liberationist Ethics of Care and Resistance

Sölle’s ethics combine a feminist emphasis on care and relationships with liberation theology’s focus on structural transformation. She describes love as non‑possessive, linking it to ecological responsibility and economic sharing. The command to love God and neighbor is interpreted as a summons to challenge systems that prevent flourishing. Supporters view this synthesis as an important contribution to feminist social ethics; critics question whether her strong politicization of love risks downplaying intimate and familial dimensions in favor of public activism.

8. Methodology and Use of Language

8.1 Interdisciplinary and Contextual Method

Sölle’s methodology is contextual and interdisciplinary. She draws from biblical exegesis, systematic theology, philosophy, sociology, and literary studies, while constantly referencing concrete political events. Rather than building a closed system, she adopts a “theology in conversation” approach, revising her positions in dialogue with movements such as feminism, liberation theology, and peace activism. Advocates see this as intellectually open and responsive; critics sometimes perceive a lack of systematic rigor.

8.2 Poetic and Metaphorical Language

A distinctive feature is her poetic, metaphor‑rich style. She frequently employs aphorisms—such as “God has no other hands than ours”—and writes prayers and meditations alongside essays. She holds that metaphor and narrative are not decorative but constitutive of theological insight, capable of disrupting ideological patterns and expanding moral imagination.

"

“Faith is not opium but the courage to say no to injustice and yes to life.”

— Dorothee Sölle, Beyond Mere Obedience

Some scholars praise this theological poetics for engaging wider audiences and honoring the symbolic nature of religious language; others argue that its ambiguity can blur doctrinal boundaries and invite divergent interpretations.

8.3 Hermeneutics of Suspicion and Hope

Methodologically, Sölle combines a hermeneutics of suspicion—inspired by Marx, Freud, and critical theory—with a hermeneutics of hope grounded in biblical promise. She subjects religious traditions to critique for their complicity in domination, yet seeks to retrieve liberating strands. This dual hermeneutic informs her readings of Scripture, where she emphasizes texts that support resistance and solidarity.

8.4 Praxis as Criterion of Truth

For Sölle, the praxis generated by a theology functions as a key criterion for its adequacy: doctrines are evaluated by their effects on the oppressed and on creation. Supporters identify this as a liberationist epistemology, aligning with the idea that “the poor are a privileged locus of theological reflection.” Critics caution that this risks reducing truth to political usefulness or aligning theology too closely with particular movements.

9. Engagement with Philosophy and Critical Theory

9.1 Dialogue with Marxism and Critical Theory

Sölle engages extensively with Marxist critique of religion, accepting its exposure of religion as an “opiate” when it legitimates oppression. She seeks to transform religion into a resource for critical consciousness and protest. Her writings reflect familiarity with Frankfurt School themes—ideology critique, reification, and the culture industry—especially in her criticism of consumerism and media. Proponents view her as a theological interlocutor of critical theory; some philosophers argue that her use of Marx and Frankfurt thought is more programmatic than technically detailed.

9.2 Existentialism and Phenomenology

Influences from Kierkegaard and existentialist philosophy appear in her focus on individual decision, dread, and authenticity, particularly in early writings. She also shares with phenomenology an interest in lived experience, especially in accounts of mystical perception and everyday spirituality. Interpretations vary on how systematically she incorporates phenomenological method; many see her more as an existentially attuned theologian than as a strict phenomenologist.

9.3 Post-Holocaust Philosophy of Religion

Sölle contributes to post‑Auschwitz philosophy of religion by questioning the coherence and morality of classical theism after the Holocaust. Her critique of omnipotence resonates with process philosophers (e.g., Whitehead, Hartshorne) and with other post‑Holocaust thinkers who reject justifying evil. Some philosophers of religion engage her as a key proponent of anti‑theodicy; others challenge whether abandoning omnipotence adequately addresses metaphysical questions about divine agency and providence.

9.4 Feminist and Liberationist Ethics

Her engagement with feminist ethics overlaps with philosophical debates on care, justice, and embodiment. She argues for a non‑dominating, relational model of the self, aligned with some strands of care ethics, while preserving a strong emphasis on structural injustice. In dialogue with liberation ethics, she treats praxis and the perspective of the poor as epistemically significant. Critics from more traditional philosophical backgrounds sometimes regard this as over‑politicizing ethics, whereas liberationist philosophers value her integration of personal and structural dimensions.

9.5 Secularization and “Christian Atheism”

Sölle’s idea of Christian atheism intersects with philosophical discussions of secularization, death‑of‑God theology, and the fate of religious language in modernity. Some interpreters link her to thinkers who interpret God as symbol or depth dimension (e.g., Tillich), while others compare her with more radical death‑of‑God movements. Debate continues over whether her position constitutes a form of revised theism, religious non‑realism, or something in between.

10. Reception, Criticisms, and Debates

10.1 Enthusiastic Reception in Activist and Pastoral Contexts

Sölle’s work has been warmly received among peace activists, ecclesial reform movements, and communities seeking a politically engaged spirituality. Her accessible style and liturgical experiments made her influential in German Protestant churches and in U.S. mainline denominations. Many pastors and lay groups have used her prayers and meditations in worship, valuing their blend of poetic language and social critique.

10.2 Academic Appreciation and Reservations

In academic theology and religious studies, Sölle is widely acknowledged as a major figure in political theology, feminist theology, and post‑Holocaust thought. Scholars praise her for foregrounding the ethical and political implications of God‑language and for integrating mysticism with activism. At the same time, some systematic theologians criticize her for what they view as insufficient doctrinal precision, especially regarding Trinity, Christology, and the ontological status of God in light of “Christian atheism.”

10.3 Debates over Omnipotence and Theodicy

Her rejection of divine omnipotence has sparked substantial debate. Supporters argue that it offers a morally credible account of God after Auschwitz and prevents theological justification of suffering. Critics contend that her view risks making God impotent or identical with human action, thereby undermining worship and hope in divine liberation. Philosophers of religion also dispute whether her anti‑theodic stance truly avoids explaining evil or simply relocates explanatory burdens.

10.4 Concerns about Politicization of Theology

Opponents from more conservative or apolitical positions argue that Sölle over‑politicizes faith, turning Christianity into a vehicle for left‑wing agendas (anti‑capitalism, pacifism, feminism). They worry that such an approach subordinates revelation to ideology. Sölle’s defenders respond that all theology has political implications and that her work merely makes them explicit and subject to critique.

10.5 Internal Feminist and Liberationist Critiques

Within feminist and liberationist circles, responses are also mixed. Some feminists regard her as pioneering but suggest that she does not fully address sexuality, embodiment, and intersectionality. Some liberation theologians appreciate her solidarity but question whether her predominantly Western context limits her grasp of global South realities. These internal critiques have helped shape subsequent developments that extend, revise, or move beyond her framework.

11. Legacy and Historical Significance

11.1 Influence on Theology and Church Practice

Sölle’s legacy in Protestant theology is evident in the normalization of political, feminist, and ecological concerns within mainstream discourse. Her challenge to omnipotence and her emphasis on God’s solidarity have influenced subsequent process, kenotic, and relational theologies. Liturgically, her prayers, songs, and the model of the Political Night‑Prayers have inspired experimental worship forms that integrate social critique with contemplation.

11.2 Contribution to Post-Holocaust and Liberation Thought

In the landscape of post‑Holocaust theology, Sölle is frequently cited as a key voice insisting that traditional theodicies are unacceptable. Her insistence that God suffers with victims has helped shape both Christian and broader philosophical reflections on evil and divine power. Within liberation theology, she is often remembered as a crucial European interlocutor, translating liberationist insights into a Northern context and promoting global awareness in Western churches.

11.3 Feminist and Mystical Legacies

Her feminist reinterpretation of God and church contributed to the growth of women’s theological networks in Germany and beyond, and her writings remain standard references in feminist theology courses. The notion of “mysticism as resistance” has been taken up in studies of spirituality, political activism, and peace studies, influencing discussions on how inner transformation relates to social change.

11.4 Ongoing Relevance and Reassessment

Contemporary scholars and activists revisit Sölle in light of issues such as climate crisis, neoliberal globalization, and religious fundamentalism. Some see her work as prescient in addressing consumerism and ecological devastation; others reassess her categories in dialogue with newer perspectives, including postcolonial and intersectional theories. Her death in 2003 while lecturing is often noted symbolically, underscoring her lifelong commitment to public theological engagement.

Overall, Sölle occupies a significant place in 20th‑century religious thought as a figure who persistently linked God, suffering, and power to concrete historical struggles, and whose work continues to serve as a resource and a provocation for theology, philosophy of religion, and political ethics.