Genevieve Margaret Lloyd (b. 1941) is an Australian philosopher whose work has decisively reshaped how contemporary thinkers understand the relation between rationality, gender, and the history of Western philosophy. Trained in the analytic and historical traditions, she became internationally known with The Man of Reason (1984), which argued that dominant ideals of reason in Western thought have been symbolically coded as male. Rather than merely documenting exclusion, Lloyd showed how canonical philosophers from Plato and Descartes to Kant and Hegel helped construct a cultural image of rationality that implicitly defined the feminine as its other. This historical diagnosis provided feminist theory with a powerful conceptual tool: the idea that appeals to “reason” may smuggle in gendered norms. Lloyd’s later work turned especially to Spinoza, developing a nuanced reading of his metaphysics, ethics, and account of self-knowledge. She explored how Spinoza’s monism and conception of affect can underwrite non-dualistic, non-hierarchical understandings of the mind–body relation, opening space for rethinking subjectivity beyond masculinist ideals of autonomy. Across her career, Lloyd has combined rigorous scholarship on early modern philosophy with an innovative feminist hermeneutic, influencing debates on rationality, embodiment, secularism, and the very self-image of philosophy.
At a Glance
- Field
- Thinker
- Born
- 1941-10-16 — Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Died
- Floruit
- 1970s–2010sPeriod of greatest intellectual productivity and influence
- Active In
- Australia, United Kingdom
- Interests
- Feminist philosophyConcept of reasonHistory of rationalitySpinoza’s philosophyEthicsMetaphysicsGender and philosophyPhilosophy of the emotions
Western philosophy has historically constructed an ideal of rationality symbolically coded as masculine—privileging abstraction, self-control, and detachment—and this gendered image of reason both shapes and limits philosophical conceptions of subjectivity, ethics, and knowledge; a critical, historically informed re-reading of canonical thinkers, particularly Spinoza, can help articulate alternative models of rationality and self-knowledge that integrate embodiment, affect, and relationality without reproducing hierarchical oppositions between the ‘male’ and the ‘female’.
The Man of Reason: ‘Male’ and ‘Female’ in Western Philosophy
Composed: late 1970s–1983
Part of Nature: Self-Knowledge in Spinoza’s Ethics
Composed: early 1990s–1994
Spinoza and the Ethics
Composed: late 1990s–2000
Providence Lost
Composed: early 2000s–2007
The Man of Reason: ‘Male’ and ‘Female’ in Western Philosophy (2nd ed.)
Composed: late 1980s–1993
The ideal of the Man of Reason has been more than a philosophical abstraction; it has permeated our culture, shaping ideals of what it is to be a person at all.— Genevieve Lloyd, The Man of Reason: ‘Male’ and ‘Female’ in Western Philosophy, 2nd ed. (London: Routledge, 1993), Introduction.
Lloyd explains why the philosophical construction of rationality as masculine has wide-reaching implications beyond academic discourse, informing social norms about personhood.
What has been presented as reason’s universality has in practice depended on the exclusion or devaluation of what has been marked as feminine.— Genevieve Lloyd, The Man of Reason: ‘Male’ and ‘Female’ in Western Philosophy (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1984), ch. 1.
She articulates her central thesis that apparently neutral appeals to reason have historically relied on gendered exclusions.
To understand ourselves as part of nature is not to diminish the ethical significance of self-knowledge, but to reconceive it.— Genevieve Lloyd, Part of Nature: Self-Knowledge in Spinoza’s Ethics (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1994), p. 3.
Lloyd outlines her interpretation of Spinoza’s account of self-knowledge as grounded in our embeddedness in nature, rather than in a transcendent, detached standpoint.
The secular confidence that history is ‘on our side’ replays, in a transformed key, older assurances of providential order.— Genevieve Lloyd, Providence Lost (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2008), conclusion.
She connects modern secular narratives of progress to reconfigured theological ideas of providence, questioning the neutrality of secular reason.
Feminist philosophy needs not only to expose exclusion, but to ask what it would mean to think differently about reason itself.— Genevieve Lloyd, “Reason, Gender and Philosophy,” in Feminist Perspectives in Philosophy, ed. M. Griffiths (essay collection, 1990s).
Lloyd emphasizes that feminist critique requires a reimagining of rationality, not just the inclusion of previously marginalized voices.
Formation in Analytic and Historical Philosophy (1960s–early 1970s)
Educated at the University of Sydney during a period dominated by Anglo-American analytic philosophy, Lloyd acquired strong training in logic, language, and the history of early modern thought. This background equipped her to read canonical texts with technical care while eventually questioning the implicit assumptions about reason and objectivity that structured the discipline.
Turn to Feminist Critique of Reason (mid-1970s–1980s)
Engaging with emerging feminist theory and the women’s movement, Lloyd began to scrutinize the historical construction of reason and its symbolic masculinization. This resulted in *The Man of Reason*, where she traced how philosophical ideals of rationality, clarity, and self-control became culturally associated with masculinity, and how this history shaped both philosophical content and disciplinary self-understanding.
Spinoza, Self-Knowledge, and Subjectivity (1990s)
In the 1990s Lloyd developed a sustained engagement with Spinoza, reading him as a resource for reconceiving selfhood, emotion, and ethical life without the rigid mind–body dualism that underpins many gendered hierarchies. Works such as *Part of Nature* offered an influential interpretation of Spinoza’s conception of self-knowledge as an affective, embodied process, rather than a purely detached, rational self-survey.
Providence, Secular Modernity, and the History of Ideas (2000s–2010s)
Lloyd increasingly explored broader intellectual-historical themes such as providence, contingency, and the emergence of secular conceptions of history. In *Providence Lost* and later essays, she connected theological transformations to changing ideas of rationality and agency, arguing that modern secular images of reason and progress carry reconfigured residues of religious narratives.
1. Introduction
Genevieve Margaret Lloyd (b. 1941) is an Australian philosopher whose work has become a key reference point for debates about rationality, gender, and the history of modern philosophy. Working at the intersection of feminist theory and the history of ideas, she is widely associated with the concept of the “Man of Reason”—her term for a culturally dominant ideal of rationality symbolically coded as masculine.
Lloyd’s approach links close readings of canonical figures—especially from early modern philosophy—to broader questions about how Western cultures imagine reason, subjectivity, and historical progress. Rather than treating philosophy as an isolated discipline, she situates philosophical concepts within wider cultural patterns, including gender norms and religious narratives.
Her work has been especially influential in two areas: feminist philosophy of reason, where she analyzes the gendered imagery that shapes philosophical ideals of rationality; and Spinoza studies, where she develops a non-dualistic account of self-knowledge and embodiment, drawing on Spinozist monism. In later writings she extends her historical analysis to the themes of providence and secular reason, arguing that modern views of rationality and progress often preserve, in altered form, earlier theological assumptions.
The table below situates her principal domains of inquiry:
| Domain of focus | Characteristic questions in Lloyd’s work |
|---|---|
| Reason and gender | How has “reason” been symbolically masculinized? |
| Early modern philosophy (esp. Spinoza) | How do canonical texts shape models of self and knowledge? |
| Emotions and embodiment | Can rationality be reconceived without denigrating affect? |
| Providence and secular modernity | How do theological ideas persist within secular images of reason? |
This combination of feminist critique and historical reconstruction has made Lloyd a significant figure in contemporary Anglophone philosophy.
2. Life and Historical Context
Genevieve Lloyd was born on 16 October 1941 in Sydney, Australia, and educated at the University of Sydney during the early 1960s, a period when Anglo-American analytic philosophy dominated Australian departments. This setting exposed her to rigorous training in logic and the history of early modern thought, within a culture that was, by later accounts, male-dominated both demographically and intellectually.
Her academic career developed largely within Australian institutions, notably the University of New South Wales and later the University of Sydney, where in 1996 she became the first woman to hold a Chair in Philosophy in Australia (Challis Professor). This appointment has often been cited as emblematic of the gradual institutional recognition of women in a discipline that remained numerically and structurally skewed toward men.
Lloyd’s formative years overlapped with the rise of second-wave feminism and the women’s liberation movement in the 1970s. These wider social changes provided a backdrop for her engagement with feminist theory and for her questioning of philosophy’s self-image as a gender-neutral enterprise. At the same time, she worked in a national context somewhat peripheral to the traditional European and North American centers of philosophical innovation, a circumstance some commentators view as facilitating a distinctive perspective on the canon.
| Period | Contextual features relevant to Lloyd’s work |
|---|---|
| 1960s–early 1970s | Ascendancy of analytic philosophy in Australia; limited presence of women. |
| Mid-1970s–1980s | Growth of feminist movements; emergence of feminist philosophy as a field. |
| 1990s–2000s | Renewed interest in early modern thinkers; expansion of global Spinoza studies. |
These contexts shaped both the themes Lloyd pursued and the institutional spaces in which she worked.
3. Intellectual Development
Lloyd’s intellectual trajectory is often described in terms of successive, though overlapping, phases, each marked by a distinctive set of questions and interlocutors.
Formation in Analytic and Historical Traditions
During the 1960s and early 1970s, Lloyd’s work reflected the influence of analytic philosophy and detailed historical scholarship on early modern thinkers. She developed skills in conceptual analysis and textual exegesis, particularly of Descartes and his successors. This period laid the groundwork for her later critical and feminist engagements.
Turn to Feminist Critique of Reason
In the mid-1970s and 1980s, amid the growing visibility of feminist theory, Lloyd redirected her attention to the gendered assumptions embedded in philosophical ideals of rationality. This culminated in The Man of Reason (1984), where she combined historical study with feminist critique. She moved from asking what canonical philosophers said about reason to asking how their images of reason were symbolically coded as masculine and what that coding implied for conceptions of subjectivity.
Spinoza, Selfhood, and Affects
By the 1990s, Lloyd’s focus shifted toward a sustained re-reading of Spinoza. She explored how Spinozist monism might support an understanding of self-knowledge and affect that avoids hierarchical mind–body dualism. This phase deepened her engagement with metaphysics and ethics while maintaining her interest in the cultural and gendered dimensions of philosophical concepts.
Providence and Secular Modernity
From the 2000s onward, Lloyd broadened her historical range, investigating how concepts of providence and divine order informed later, ostensibly secular, narratives of rational progress. This stage integrates her longstanding concerns about rationality with the intellectual history of theology and secularism.
| Phase | Dominant concerns |
|---|---|
| Analytic/historical (1960s–early 70s) | Canonical early modern philosophy, conceptual clarity |
| Feminist critique (mid-70s–1980s) | Gender and rationality, symbolic masculinization |
| Spinoza focus (1990s) | Monism, self-knowledge, affects, embodiment |
| Providence/secularism (2000s–2010s) | Theological residues in secular reason and history |
4. Major Works
Lloyd’s major books trace the evolution of her concerns from gendered rationality to Spinoza and the history of providence. The following overview highlights central themes and scholarly receptions without assessing their merits.
| Work | Main focus | Typical scholarly characterization |
|---|---|---|
| The Man of Reason: ‘Male’ and ‘Female’ in Western Philosophy (1984; rev. ed. 1993) | Historical analysis of how Western ideals of rationality became symbolically associated with masculinity. | Regarded as a foundational text in feminist philosophy of reason and feminist history of philosophy. |
| Part of Nature: Self-Knowledge in Spinoza’s Ethics (1994) | Interpretation of Spinoza’s conception of self-knowledge as an embodied, affective process grounded in monism. | Seen as a significant contribution to Anglophone Spinoza scholarship and to rethinking subjectivity. |
| Spinoza and the Ethics / Spinoza: The Routledge Philosophers (2000) | Systematic exposition of Spinoza’s metaphysics, epistemology, and ethics, emphasizing affects and embodiment. | Frequently used as an accessible yet philosophically substantial guide to Spinoza. |
| Providence Lost (2007/2008) | Intellectual history of providence and its transformation in secular accounts of history and rational progress. | Discussed in debates on secularization, political theology, and the history of ideas. |
The Man of Reason
In The Man of Reason, Lloyd traces how canonical philosophers, from Plato to Hegel, contributed to a cultural figure of reason that is both abstract and aligned with masculine-coded traits such as self-control and detachment. She argues that this symbolism has implications for conceptions of personhood.
“The ideal of the Man of Reason has been more than a philosophical abstraction; it has permeated our culture, shaping ideals of what it is to be a person at all.”
— Genevieve Lloyd, The Man of Reason, 2nd ed.
Spinoza and Providence Studies
Her Spinoza works present monism and affectivity as resources for rethinking selfhood, while Providence Lost extends historical analysis to the fate of theological ideas within secular narratives. Across these texts, Lloyd maintains an interest in how large-scale images of order—rational, natural, or providential—structure philosophical understandings of agency and history.
5. Core Ideas on Reason and Gender
Lloyd’s work on reason and gender centers on the concept of the “Man of Reason”, a historically specific ideal of rationality that, she argues, has been symbolically masculinized within Western philosophy and culture.
Symbolic Masculinization of Reason
According to Lloyd’s analysis, philosophical traditions have often associated reason with traits culturally coded as masculine—abstraction, self-mastery, detachment—while aligning the feminine with emotion, embodiment, and nature. She contends that this has occurred through both explicit statements about women’s rational capacities and more subtle imagery embedded in metaphors and narratives.
“What has been presented as reason’s universality has in practice depended on the exclusion or devaluation of what has been marked as feminine.”
— Genevieve Lloyd, The Man of Reason
Historical Construction Rather Than Essence
Lloyd treats the Man of Reason not as an essence of rationality but as a historical construct, shaped by philosophical and cultural developments from antiquity to modernity. Proponents of this reading highlight her close textual work on figures such as Plato, Descartes, and Kant, showing how their accounts of reason presuppose and reinforce gendered dichotomies (reason/emotion, mind/body, culture/nature).
Feminist Responses to the Man of Reason
Lloyd distinguishes between feminist strategies that:
| Strategy (as discussed by Lloyd) | Characterization |
|---|---|
| Claim inclusion within existing rational ideals | Argue that women are equally capable bearers of “universal” reason. |
| Reject reason as patriarchal | View rationality itself as irredeemably tied to domination. |
| Reconfigure reason (Lloyd’s focus of analysis) | Seek to rethink rationality to include affect, embodiment, and relationality. |
She does not prescribe a single strategy but emphasizes the need to question and potentially transform inherited ideals of reason.
Reception and Critique
Supporters regard Lloyd’s concept of the Man of Reason as clarifying how appeals to neutrality can mask gendered exclusions. Critics have raised concerns that her focus on high philosophical traditions may underplay alternative cultural images of rationality, or that the category of “the feminine” risks homogenization. Others propose extending her framework to race, class, and coloniality, arguing that the symbolic coding of reason is intersectional.
6. Spinoza, Self-Knowledge, and Monism
Lloyd’s engagement with Spinoza centers on how Spinozist monism—the doctrine that there is only one substance, God or Nature—reconfigures selfhood, knowledge, and affect. Her interpretation links technical metaphysical claims to questions about subjectivity and embodiment.
Monism and the Rejection of Dualism
Lloyd emphasizes that Spinoza’s monism undermines sharp dichotomies such as mind vs. body and reason vs. passion. On her reading, this metaphysical framework challenges hierarchical models in which a rational, often implicitly masculine, self rules over a lower, bodily or emotional self. Instead, mental and bodily states are understood as parallel expressions of the same underlying reality.
Self-Knowledge as “Part of Nature”
In Part of Nature, Lloyd argues that Spinoza’s notion of self-knowledge (cognitio sui) involves recognizing oneself as a finite mode within the total order of nature, rather than as an autonomous, self-transparent subject standing over against the world.
“To understand ourselves as part of nature is not to diminish the ethical significance of self-knowledge, but to reconceive it.”
— Genevieve Lloyd, Part of Nature
She interprets self-knowledge as an achievement that is both cognitive and affective, entailing a transformation of how one is affected by events and by one’s own desires.
Affects and Rationality
Lloyd presents Spinoza’s theory of the affects as offering a model in which emotions are neither irrational intruders nor simply to be repressed. Instead, increasing understanding of the causal order modifies affects and can lead to more stable forms of joy and empowerment. Commentators who adopt her view see this as an alternative to traditions that valorize detached rationality.
Debates over Lloyd’s Spinoza
Some scholars welcome Lloyd’s account as aligning Spinoza with contemporary concerns about embodiment and relational selfhood. Others argue that she may understate aspects of Spinoza’s rationalism or his emphasis on intellectual love of God, contending that his project remains more “intellectualist” than her interpretation suggests. An alternative line of criticism questions how far Spinoza himself can sustain the feminist uses to which Lloyd’s reading puts him, while acknowledging that her work has significantly shaped Anglophone discussions of Spinoza and selfhood.
7. Providence, Secularism, and Historical Narrative
In her later work, especially Providence Lost, Lloyd examines how ideas of providence—divine ordering or guidance of history—have shaped, and been transformed within, modern secular conceptions of reason and progress.
From Providence to Secular Reason
Lloyd traces shifts from early modern theological accounts, in which events are interpreted within a providential plan, to Enlightenment and post-Enlightenment narratives that portray history as governed by rational laws or inevitable progress. She argues that these ostensibly secular narratives often replay providential structures in a new key, investing history with a sense of direction and assurance.
“The secular confidence that history is ‘on our side’ replays, in a transformed key, older assurances of providential order.”
— Genevieve Lloyd, Providence Lost
Narratives of Progress and Their Ambiguities
Lloyd analyzes how modern notions of historical progress can function as substitutes for divine providence, providing reassurance about the rationality and justice of historical outcomes. Proponents of her view hold that this analysis complicates simple contrasts between religious and secular reason by revealing underlying continuities.
Critical and Alternative Perspectives
Some commentators adopt Lloyd’s suggestion that secularism carries “residual theology”, arguing that this helps explain the normative force of ideas like inevitable progress or the moral arc of history. Others maintain that modern secular accounts of history can be understood without recourse to providential analogies, seeing her emphasis on continuity as overstated.
A further debate concerns the political implications of such narratives. While Lloyd herself focuses on intellectual history, some readers connect her analysis with critiques of Eurocentric or teleological histories, suggesting that secularized providential narratives can legitimize existing power structures. Alternative interpretations, however, view narratives of progress as revisable frameworks rather than disguised theology.
Place within Wider Scholarship
Lloyd’s work on providence intersects with debates in secularization theory and political theology, though she writes primarily as a historian of ideas. Her approach highlights how background images of order—divine or secular—shape conceptions of rationality, agency, and historical possibility.
8. Methodology and Feminist Hermeneutics
Lloyd’s methodology combines close historical scholarship with a distinctively feminist form of interpretation often described as a feminist history of philosophy. She neither simply denounces canonical texts as patriarchal nor treats them as timeless repositories of neutral truths.
Historical and Textual Approach
Lloyd’s readings of philosophers such as Descartes, Spinoza, and Hegel proceed through detailed engagement with primary texts, situating them in their intellectual contexts. She pays attention to metaphors, imagery, and narrative structures, as well as to explicit arguments, in order to trace how gendered meanings become attached to reason, nature, and subjectivity.
Feminist Hermeneutics
Her feminist hermeneutics aims to uncover how philosophical concepts are shaped by, and help shape, broader gendered imaginaries. Rather than focusing only on what philosophers say about women, she investigates how their accounts of reason, mind, and emotion presuppose distinctions that resonate with gendered oppositions (male/female, rational/emotional, culture/nature).
“Feminist philosophy needs not only to expose exclusion, but to ask what it would mean to think differently about reason itself.”
— Genevieve Lloyd, “Reason, Gender and Philosophy”
Constructive and Critical Dimensions
Lloyd’s method has both critical and constructive aspects:
| Dimension | Emphasis in Lloyd’s work |
|---|---|
| Critical | Revealing how ideals of rationality have been gendered and exclusionary. |
| Constructive | Identifying resources within canonical texts for rethinking reason, selfhood, and affect. |
She often seeks “internal” possibilities for transformation within a philosopher’s system, as in her use of Spinoza to articulate non-dualistic models of self-knowledge.
Methodological Debates
Some feminist philosophers praise Lloyd’s approach for avoiding reductive critiques and for showing how canonical figures can be read in more generative ways. Others question whether her focus on the canonical European tradition risks marginalizing non-Western or subaltern perspectives. Still others argue that her textual orientation may underplay institutional and material dimensions of exclusion. These debates situate her methodology within wider discussions about how to decolonize and diversify the history of philosophy while maintaining rigorous historical practice.
9. Impact on Feminist Philosophy and Spinoza Studies
Lloyd’s work has had substantial influence in at least two overlapping domains: feminist philosophy—especially analyses of rationality and gender—and Spinoza studies.
Feminist Philosophy of Reason
The Man of Reason has been widely cited as a pioneering articulation of how the ideal of rationality in Western philosophy is symbolically masculinized. Feminist philosophers have drawn on Lloyd’s framework to:
- Critique appeals to “neutral” reason in ethics, politics, and epistemology.
- Analyze how philosophical conceptions of the self exclude or devalue affect, embodiment, and dependency.
- Develop alternative models of rationality that integrate emotional and relational dimensions.
Even critics who dispute particular historical readings often acknowledge the importance of her central conceptual contribution—the figure of the Man of Reason—as a tool for examining gendered structures in philosophy.
Institutional and Disciplinary Influence
In the Australian context, Lloyd’s appointments and teaching contributed to the institutionalization of feminist philosophy, influencing curricula and mentoring emerging scholars. Internationally, her work is included in anthologies and courses on feminist theory, history of philosophy, and philosophy of gender.
Contributions to Spinoza Scholarship
In Spinoza studies, Lloyd is recognized for highlighting the significance of affects, embodiment, and monism for understanding self-knowledge and ethics. Her interpretations have been used:
| Area in Spinoza scholarship | Use of Lloyd’s work |
|---|---|
| Ethics and psychology | To emphasize affective transformation over mere rule-following. |
| Metaphysics and mind–body relation | To argue for non-dualistic, non-hierarchical models of the self. |
| Feminist engagements with early modernity | To present Spinoza as a resource for rethinking subjectivity. |
Some scholars adopt her readings directly, while others position their interpretations in dialogue with hers, either extending her insights or contesting her emphasis on embodiment.
Cross-Field Resonances
Lloyd’s later work on providence and secular reason has also influenced discussions in political theory, religious studies, and intellectual history, where it is used to analyze the persistence of theological motifs in secular narratives. Across these fields, her impact lies less in founding a school than in providing conceptual lenses through which subsequent scholarship has re-examined rationality, subjectivity, and historical explanation.
10. Legacy and Historical Significance
Lloyd’s legacy is often discussed in terms of how she reshaped understandings of rationality, gender, and the history of philosophy within late 20th- and early 21st-century thought.
Reframing Reason in Feminist Philosophy
By articulating the notion of the Man of Reason, Lloyd provided a widely adopted framework for analyzing the gendered dimensions of rational ideals. Her work has been cited as moving feminist philosophy beyond demands for inclusion toward a more structural critique of how philosophical concepts themselves are historically coded. This has influenced later debates on rationality, affect, and embodiment across diverse areas of philosophy.
Influence on the Canon and Its Interpretation
Lloyd’s readings of Descartes, Spinoza, and other early moderns have contributed to a broader re-evaluation of the Western canon. Her work is frequently referenced as an example of how feminist perspectives can produce new interpretations rather than simply adding marginalized voices. In Spinoza studies, her emphasis on monism and affect has helped consolidate an approach that treats Spinoza as a resource for contemporary theories of selfhood.
Position within Intellectual History
Historians of ideas sometimes locate Lloyd among thinkers who have probed the continuities between theological and secular images of order. Her analysis of providence and secular reason has been taken up in discussions of secularization, political theology, and narratives of progress. In this respect, her work is seen as part of a wider reconsideration of the self-understanding of modernity.
Assessment and Ongoing Debates
Commentators differ on how to assess Lloyd’s long-term significance. Supporters emphasize her role in legitimizing feminist approaches within mainstream philosophy and in offering enduring conceptual tools. Critics tend to focus on perceived limitations in her canon-centered and Eurocentric focus, or on debates about the extent to which canonical figures can bear feminist reinterpretation.
Despite these disagreements, there is broad recognition that Lloyd has played a significant role in transforming how philosophers and historians of ideas think about the relations between reason, gender, embodiment, and historical narrative, and that her work continues to serve as a reference point for new lines of inquiry.
How to Cite This Entry
Use these citation formats to reference this thinkers entry in your academic work. Click the copy button to copy the citation to your clipboard.
Philopedia. (2025). Genevieve Margaret Lloyd. Philopedia. https://philopedia.com/thinkers/genevieve-lloyd/
"Genevieve Margaret Lloyd." Philopedia, 2025, https://philopedia.com/thinkers/genevieve-lloyd/.
Philopedia. "Genevieve Margaret Lloyd." Philopedia. Accessed December 11, 2025. https://philopedia.com/thinkers/genevieve-lloyd/.
@online{philopedia_genevieve_lloyd,
title = {Genevieve Margaret Lloyd},
author = {Philopedia},
year = {2025},
url = {https://philopedia.com/thinkers/genevieve-lloyd/},
urldate = {December 11, 2025}
}Note: This entry was last updated on 2025-12-10. For the most current version, always check the online entry.