Francis Kwame Nkrumah
Kwame Nkrumah (1909–1972) was a Ghanaian political leader, Pan-African theorist, and one of the most philosophically ambitious architects of postcolonial Africa. Educated in the United States and the United Kingdom, he absorbed Marxism, liberal political thought, and African diasporic intellectual traditions, fusing them with African communal values into a distinctive vision of African socialism. As the first Prime Minister and later President of independent Ghana, Nkrumah treated the new nation as a testing ground for ideas about decolonization, development, and continental unity. His major theoretical works—especially “Consciencism,” “Africa Must Unite,” and “Neo-Colonialism: The Last Stage of Imperialism”—develop a materialist philosophy of history oriented around liberation, critique the persistence of economic domination after formal independence, and argue for a united socialist Africa as a rational response to global capitalism. While not a professional philosopher, Nkrumah deeply influenced African philosophy by articulating a programmatic account of ideology, culture, and identity under conditions of colonial fragmentation. His thought continues to shape debates about postcolonial sovereignty, Pan-Africanism, and the philosophical basis of development in the Global South.
At a Glance
- Field
- Thinker
- Born
- 1909-09-21 — Nkroful, Gold Coast (now Ghana)
- Died
- 1972-04-27 — Bucharest, Socialist Republic of RomaniaCause: Prostate cancer (complicated by exile and illness)
- Active In
- Ghana, West Africa, United States, United Kingdom, Egypt, Global Pan-African movements
- Interests
- DecolonizationPan-African unitySocialismNational liberationNeo-colonialismPhilosophy of historyAfrican identity and cultureNon-alignment and world order
Kwame Nkrumah’s thought system holds that genuine decolonization requires not only political independence but also the conscious transformation of social consciousness, economic structures, and continental institutions; he argues for a materialist, socialist Pan-Africanism—termed “Consciencism”—that synthesizes Africa’s traditional humanism with the egalitarian elements of Christianity and Islam, in order to overcome neo-colonial domination and create a unified, self-determining African presence in world history.
Autobiography of Kwame Nkrumah
Composed: 1957
I Speak of Freedom: A Statement of African Ideology
Composed: 1961
Africa Must Unite
Composed: 1963
Consciencism: Philosophy and Ideology for Decolonization
Composed: 1964
Neo-Colonialism: The Last Stage of Imperialism
Composed: 1965
Class Struggle in Africa
Composed: 1967
Challenge of the Congo
Composed: 1967
Freedom is not something that one people can bestow on another as a gift. They claim it as their own and none can keep it from them.— Kwame Nkrumah, “Autobiography of Kwame Nkrumah” (1957)
Expresses his view that liberation is an act of collective self-assertion, grounding his activist conception of political agency and decolonization.
Seek ye first the political kingdom, and all other things shall be added unto you.— Attributed to Kwame Nkrumah in speeches during the early independence period, e.g., “I Speak of Freedom” (1961)
Summarizes his conviction that political sovereignty is the necessary precondition for economic transformation and cultural renewal.
The essence of neo-colonialism is that the State which is subject to it is, in theory, independent and has all the outward trappings of international sovereignty. In reality its economic system and thus its political policy is directed from outside.— Kwame Nkrumah, “Neo-Colonialism: The Last Stage of Imperialism” (1965)
Defines his key concept of neo-colonialism, articulating a central thesis that influenced later postcolonial and dependency theorists.
Socialism in Africa is not an imported creed. It is the expression in modern conditions of the traditional African life.— Kwame Nkrumah, “African Socialism Revisited” (1967 lecture, published in “Africa Today”)
Clarifies his view that African socialism arises from indigenous communal values, not merely from European ideological imports.
Practice without thought is blind; thought without practice is empty.— Paraphrased formulation of Nkrumah’s repeated insistence in “Consciencism” (1964) on the unity of theory and praxis.
Captures his philosophical method, which rejects purely academic speculation in favor of theory grounded in revolutionary practice.
Colonial Formation and Catholic Schooling (1909–1935)
Raised in the British Gold Coast and educated in Catholic mission schools, Nkrumah encountered Western religious and moral doctrine alongside indigenous Akan values. Early work as a teacher and contact with nationalist figures introduced him to questions about colonial injustice and self-determination, preparing the ground for his later anti-colonial philosophy.
Transatlantic Radicalization in the United States (1935–1945)
In the U.S., Nkrumah studied theology, education, and philosophy at Lincoln University and the University of Pennsylvania. He engaged with pragmatism, Marxism, and the works of W. E. B. Du Bois and Marcus Garvey, while participating in Black activist networks. This period shaped his commitment to an activist conception of philosophy that fuses theory with mass political organization.
Pan-African Synthesis in Britain (1945–1947)
In London he collaborated with George Padmore and others at the 5th Pan-African Congress, sharpening his critique of imperialism and developing the conviction that African liberation required continental coordination. Here he began to articulate an explicitly Pan-African socialist horizon, situating African struggles within a global anti-capitalist framework.
Revolutionary Nationalist and State Builder (1947–1966)
Back in the Gold Coast, Nkrumah founded the CPP, led mass civil disobedience, and became Ghana’s first leader. In power he experimented with state-led development, one-party rule, and ambitious modernization projects. His philosophical reflections on decolonization, ideology, and African unity matured in works like “Africa Must Unite,” “Consciencism,” and “Neo-Colonialism.”
Exiled Theorist of Neo-Colonialism (1966–1972)
After his ouster, Nkrumah lived in Guinea and later received medical treatment in Eastern Europe. Free from day-to-day governance, he turned to developing a more systematic theory of neo-colonial domination, the world system, and the necessity of socialist Pan-African federation, leaving a lasting imprint on postcolonial and dependency theory.
1. Introduction
Kwame Nkrumah (1909–1972) occupies a central place in 20th‑century African and global political thought. As a theorist of Pan‑Africanism, architect of African socialism, and analyst of neo‑colonialism, he approached decolonization not only as a political process but as a philosophical transformation of consciousness, social structures, and international order.
In works such as Consciencism: Philosophy and Ideology for Decolonization (1964), Africa Must Unite (1963), and Neo‑Colonialism: The Last Stage of Imperialism (1965), Nkrumah advanced a systematic program he called Consciencism. This framework sought to harmonize three “traditions” he identified in African societies—traditional African humanism, Islam, and Christianity—under a revised historical materialism oriented toward socialist transformation and continental unity.
Nkrumah is often classed among political leaders rather than academic philosophers, yet many scholars regard him as one of the first postcolonial thinkers to articulate a self‑consciously philosophical basis for liberation struggles. His writings address metaphysical questions about matter and mind, ethical questions about equality and communal obligation, and political questions about the state, class, and imperialism.
Interpretations of his thought diverge. Some commentators emphasize his originality in adapting Marxism to African communal life and in conceptualizing neo‑colonialism. Others view his philosophy as derivative or overly instrumental to his political agenda. Still others treat him as a transitional figure whose ideas helped generate later debates in African philosophy, dependency theory, and postcolonial studies.
This entry surveys Nkrumah’s life and historical context, traces his intellectual development, analyzes his major works and core doctrines, and examines both the influence and the contested character of his contribution to modern political and philosophical thought.
2. Life and Historical Context
Nkrumah’s life unfolded across key moments in 20th‑century African and global history, from high imperialism to the Cold War and the first decades of postcolonial statehood. His experiences in colonial West Africa, the United States, Britain, and later exile shaped both the content and the tone of his political philosophy.
2.1 Biographical Outline
| Period | Location | Key Features |
|---|---|---|
| 1909–1935 | Gold Coast | Mission schooling, teaching, early nationalism under British rule |
| 1935–1945 | United States | University studies, exposure to Marxism and Black intellectual currents |
| 1945–1947 | Britain | Pan‑African activism, 5th Pan‑African Congress in Manchester |
| 1947–1966 | Gold Coast/Ghana | Mass mobilization, independence (1957), presidency, state‑led development |
| 1966–1972 | Guinea, Eastern Europe | Exile after coup, further theoretical writing, death in Bucharest |
Born in Nkroful in the British Gold Coast, Nkrumah grew up in a colonial economy structured around cocoa exports and indirect rule. Historians argue that this setting, which combined missionary education with racialized economic hierarchies, fed his intense interest in self‑determination and social justice.
His decade in the United States coincided with the Great Depression, World War II, and the flowering of African‑American intellectual movements. Scholars link this milieu to his conviction that African struggles were inseparable from global anti‑capitalist and anti‑racist movements.
In postwar Britain, amid imperial decline and the rise of the United Nations, Nkrumah participated in transnational networks calling for immediate decolonization. The Cold War shaped his later statecraft: he presented Ghana as non‑aligned yet anti‑imperialist, seeking aid from both Western and Soviet blocs while criticizing superpower rivalry in Africa.
The 1966 coup that removed him from power occurred against a backdrop of economic strain, regional rivalries, and Western anxiety about radical African nationalism. In exile, within a socialist international environment (notably Guinea and later Romania), he further elaborated his theory of neo‑colonialism and world order, interpreting his own overthrow as part of a wider pattern of external intervention in postcolonial states.
3. Intellectual Development
Nkrumah’s thought evolved through distinct phases tied to his movements across continents and political roles. Commentators often stress both continuities—such as a persistent concern with unity and justice—and significant shifts, especially in his understanding of class and imperialism.
3.1 Colonial Formation and Early Influences
Educated in Catholic mission schools in the Gold Coast, Nkrumah encountered Thomist moral teaching, Christian personalism, and Western liberal ideas alongside Akan communal values. Biographers suggest that this early dual exposure later informed his conviction that African philosophy must consciously synthesize multiple traditions.
3.2 Transatlantic Radicalization in the United States
During his studies at Lincoln University and the University of Pennsylvania (1935–1945), Nkrumah read pragmatist philosophers, Marxist theory, and Black diasporic writers such as W. E. B. Du Bois and Marcus Garvey. He engaged in student activism and religious work, exploring the relationship between theology and social change. Analysts view this period as decisive for his turn to an activist conception of philosophy, where ideas must serve organized struggle.
3.3 Pan‑African Synthesis in Britain
In London (1945–1947), working with George Padmore and others around the 5th Pan‑African Congress, Nkrumah came to see colonialism as a global system requiring continental coordination. Here he sharpened his belief that nationalism had to be embedded in Pan‑Africanism and increasingly framed liberation in socialist and anti‑imperialist terms.
3.4 Revolutionary Nationalist and State Builder
From 1947 onward, as organizer of the Convention People’s Party and later head of government, Nkrumah’s thought shifted toward questions of state power, development planning, and ideology. Africa Must Unite, Consciencism, and Neo‑Colonialism emerge from this phase as attempts to theorize the challenges he encountered in governing.
3.5 Exiled Theorist of Neo‑Colonialism
After 1966, residing mainly in Guinea, Nkrumah devoted himself to writing. Works like Class Struggle in Africa show a more explicitly Marxist–Leninist vocabulary and a stronger emphasis on class dynamics within African societies. Some scholars interpret this as a radicalization; others see it as a logical extension of earlier themes once he was freed from the compromises of office.
4. Major Works and Key Texts
Nkrumah’s written corpus spans autobiography, political manifestos, philosophical treatises, and studies of specific conflicts. The following overview highlights texts most central to understanding his philosophy.
4.1 Autobiographical and Programmatic Texts
| Work | Date | Focus |
|---|---|---|
| Autobiography of Kwame Nkrumah | 1957 | Personal and political formation, narrative of the independence struggle |
| I Speak of Freedom | 1961 | Collected speeches outlining African ideology and development aims |
These writings combine self‑presentation with theoretical claims about leadership, mass mobilization, and the primacy of political independence.
4.2 Pan‑African and Unionist Texts
| Work | Date | Focus |
|---|---|---|
| Africa Must Unite | 1963 | Argument for political and economic federation of Africa |
| Challenge of the Congo | 1967 | Case study of postcolonial crisis, interference, and Pan‑African responsibility |
Africa Must Unite articulates his influential thesis that fragmented African states are structurally vulnerable to external domination. Challenge of the Congo applies this perspective to the Congo crisis, linking it to broader patterns of imperial involvement.
4.3 Philosophical and Theoretical Works
| Work | Date | Focus |
|---|---|---|
| Consciencism | 1964 | Systematic exposition of his philosophy of decolonization |
| Neo‑Colonialism: The Last Stage of Imperialism | 1965 | Analysis of post‑independence domination and global capitalism |
| Class Struggle in Africa | 1967 | Examination of class structures in African societies |
Consciencism provides his most explicit discussion of metaphysics, ethics, and ideology, proposing a materialist ontology and a normative defense of African socialism. Neo‑Colonialism extends Leninist theories of imperialism to the postcolonial era, arguing that control now operates primarily through economic, financial, and cultural means. Class Struggle in Africa refines his earlier focus on nationalism by theorizing African class formations and the role of a potentially “neo‑colonial” national bourgeoisie.
Scholars debate the internal coherence of these texts and the extent to which they systematically integrate his philosophical and political commitments, but they are widely regarded as foundational for later African political thought.
5. Core Ideas: Consciencism, Neo‑Colonialism, and Pan‑Africanism
This section outlines three interrelated doctrines that structure Nkrumah’s thought.
5.1 Consciencism
Consciencism is Nkrumah’s name for a philosophy and ideology of decolonization tailored to Africa’s distinctive historical situation. He argues that African societies are marked by the coexistence of three main traditions—traditional African humanism, Islam, and Christianity/Westernism—whose values often conflict. Consciencism aims to harmonize these elements within a materialist ontology and a socialist ethics of equality and communal responsibility.
Proponents emphasize that Nkrumah treats ideology as consciously constructed: philosophers and political leaders must forge a guiding “conscience” that aligns inherited beliefs with the requirements of postcolonial transformation. Critics question whether his synthesis adequately represents Africa’s religious and cultural diversity or overstates philosophical continuity among the traditions he identifies.
5.2 Neo‑Colonialism
Nkrumah’s concept of neo‑colonialism designates a condition in which nominally independent states are subject to external economic and political control. He highlights mechanisms such as unequal trade, foreign investment, military bases, and cultural influence.
“The essence of neo-colonialism is that the State which is subject to it is, in theory, independent… In reality its economic system and thus its political policy is directed from outside.”
— Kwame Nkrumah, Neo‑Colonialism: The Last Stage of Imperialism
Supporters regard this as a pioneering analysis anticipating dependency theory and world‑systems analysis. Some economists and historians, however, argue that the concept can underplay internal factors—such as domestic class interests or governance failures—in explaining postcolonial difficulties.
5.3 Pan‑Africanism
For Nkrumah, Pan‑Africanism is not merely cultural solidarity but a project of political and economic union. He contends that small, fragmented African states lack the capacity to resist imperial powers or to industrialize effectively. Union is presented as a rational response to global capitalism and Cold War power blocs.
Advocates see this as an early formulation of continental integration agendas. Skeptics argue that his model underestimated regional differences, sovereignty concerns, and the practical obstacles to rapid federation. Nonetheless, these three ideas—Consciencism, neo‑colonialism, and Pan‑Africanism—form a mutually reinforcing framework in which philosophical anthropology, critique of world order, and institutional design are tightly linked.
6. Political Theory and Philosophy of Decolonization
Nkrumah’s political theory addresses how formerly colonized societies might achieve substantive, not merely formal, independence. His philosophy of decolonization weaves together views on the state, class, development, and world order.
6.1 The Primacy of the Political
Nkrumah famously maintained that:
“Seek ye first the political kingdom, and all other things shall be added unto you.”
— Attributed to Nkrumah, I Speak of Freedom
He argues that political sovereignty is a necessary precondition for economic planning and cultural renewal. Supporters interpret this as a realistic response to colonial power structures that blocked autonomous development. Critics contend that his focus on state power contributed to centralization and the marginalization of pluralism.
6.2 The Postcolonial State and Development
Nkrumah envisions a developmental, socialist‑oriented state that directs investment, manages key industries, and promotes social welfare. Drawing on historical materialism, he presents decolonization as requiring a transformation of productive forces and property relations, not only constitutional change.
Debate centers on his endorsement of one‑party rule in certain contexts. He claimed that party unity was needed to prevent ethnic fragmentation and elite capture in fragile new states. Opponents argue that this stance provided philosophical justification for authoritarian tendencies and limited democratic experimentation.
6.3 Class, Nationalism, and International Order
In Class Struggle in Africa and related works, Nkrumah maintains that colonialism reshaped African class structures, producing a national bourgeoisie whose interests may align with external powers. He thus calls for alliances of workers, peasants, and progressive intellectuals, both within countries and across Africa.
His model of non‑alignment positions newly independent states as a “third force” rejecting both Western capitalism and Soviet‑style domination. Some interpreters see this as an attempt to widen the moral and political space for postcolonial agency; others note that in practice Ghana relied on aid and trade with both blocs, complicating the coherence of strict non‑alignment.
Overall, his philosophy of decolonization treats independence as an ongoing process requiring structural change at national, continental, and global levels.
7. Methodology: Theory, Praxis, and Ideology
Nkrumah’s methodological reflections, especially in Consciencism, articulate how he thinks philosophy should relate to political practice and social transformation.
7.1 Unity of Theory and Praxis
Nkrumah rejects purely contemplative philosophy, insisting that thought must be tested and refined in praxis—organized political activity. This stance, influenced by Marxist and pragmatist traditions, leads him to treat Ghana and Africa more broadly as arenas for “experiments” in applying theoretical insights.
He repeatedly stresses the dangers of separating the two:
“Practice without thought is blind; thought without practice is empty.”
— Paraphrase of Nkrumah’s formulations in Consciencism
Supporters view this as an important contribution to traditions of philosophy as engaged critique, while critics caution that close fusion of theory and state power can reduce space for independent intellectual disagreement.
7.2 Ideology as Conscious Construction
For Nkrumah, ideology is not mere propaganda but a necessary “map” that orients collective action. In Consciencism he argues that postcolonial societies inherit conflicting belief systems; thus, they must deliberately forge a new guiding ideology that integrates elements of their past with the demands of socialist development and Pan‑African unity.
This view positions philosophers and intellectuals as engineers of social consciousness. Admirers see here an early articulation of ideology critique in African thought. Detractors suggest that his emphasis on a unified national ideology risks suppressing ideological pluralism and underestimates the value of dissent.
7.3 Philosophical Style and Sources
Nkrumah’s method combines historical narrative, conceptual analysis, and policy argumentation. He draws eclectically on classical African notions of communalism, Christian theology, Islamic thought, and European philosophy (notably Marx, Lenin, and certain analytic distinctions about matter and mind).
Some commentators praise the synthetic ambition of this approach; others argue that his metaphysical arguments are underdeveloped relative to his political claims. There is also debate over how systematically he integrates his diverse sources, with assessments ranging from “innovative synthesis” to “strategic eclecticism.”
8. Impact on African Philosophy and Social Thought
Nkrumah’s influence extends across academic philosophy, political theory, and broader intellectual currents in Africa and the diaspora.
8.1 Role in African Philosophy
Nkrumah is frequently cited in debates about what counts as African philosophy. His attempt in Consciencism to construct a systematic metaphysics and ethics rooted in African experience has been viewed by some, such as proponents of “professional” African philosophy, as an important early model of rigorous, reflective work beyond ethnophilosophy. Others argue that his primary orientation remained political and ideological, questioning whether his writings meet disciplinary standards of argumentation and conceptual precision.
His notion of harmonizing multiple cultural heritages under a materialist framework has influenced discussions of identity, tradition, and modernity in African thought.
8.2 Influence on Political and Social Theory
Nkrumah’s analysis of neo‑colonialism has been taken up by scholars working on dependency theory, international political economy, and world‑systems approaches. While not always cited directly, his insistence on the persistence of structural subordination after formal independence prefigures later work by theorists such as Samir Amin and Immanuel Wallerstein.
In African political discourse, his Pan‑Africanism shaped debates on regional integration, inspiring projects such as the Organization of African Unity (OAU) and, later, the African Union. His advocacy of African socialism contributed to a broader family of experiments and theories associated with figures like Julius Nyerere and Léopold Sédar Senghor.
8.3 Reception and Reassessment
Reception has varied over time. During his lifetime, Nkrumah was both celebrated and criticized within African intellectual circles, particularly over his views on one‑party rule and leadership. In subsequent decades, scholars have reassessed his work in light of persistent development challenges and ongoing discussions of globalization, often highlighting the continuing relevance of his critiques of external domination, while also scrutinizing the limitations of his models of state power and ideology.
9. Criticisms and Debates
Nkrumah’s ideas have generated extensive debate across philosophy, political science, and history. Criticisms focus on both theoretical coherence and political implications.
9.1 Philosophical Critiques
Some philosophers argue that Consciencism contains tensions between metaphysical materialism and spiritual language inherited from religious traditions. They question whether his attempt to reconcile these elements yields a consistent ontology. Others find his treatment of African “traditions” overly homogenizing, suggesting that it neglects the diversity of cultures and belief systems across the continent.
There is also debate about the originality of his thought. Certain commentators see his work as largely derivative of Marxist–Leninist frameworks, adapted rhetorically to African conditions. Others counter that his articulation of neo‑colonialism and his synthesis of communalism and socialism constitute significant innovations.
9.2 Political and Ethical Critiques
Nkrumah’s justification of one‑party rule and strong executive authority has been criticized as philosophically undercutting his egalitarian and participatory ideals. Critics contend that his emphasis on ideological unity risks legitimizing repression of opposition and constraining freedom of expression.
His developmental model, oriented toward rapid industrialization and large‑scale projects, is challenged by scholars who argue that it underestimated rural realities, environmental constraints, and the value of more decentralized or participatory approaches.
9.3 Debates on Neo‑Colonialism and Pan‑Africanism
Regarding neo‑colonialism, detractors maintain that the concept can become too expansive, attributing most postcolonial problems to external forces and thereby obscuring domestic responsibility and agency. Supporters respond that it captures structural asymmetries in the global order that conventional state‑centric theories overlook.
Debates about his Pan‑Africanism concern feasibility and desirability. Some African leaders and theorists favored gradual, functional cooperation rather than the relatively rapid political federation Nkrumah advocated. They argued that his model underestimated national identities and the complexities of sovereignty, while proponents saw his vision as a necessary corrective to the vulnerabilities of fragmented states.
These controversies have kept Nkrumah’s work central to ongoing discussions about democracy, development, and postcolonial autonomy.
10. Legacy and Historical Significance
Nkrumah’s legacy spans political practice, continental institutions, and intellectual traditions, and continues to be reassessed as African and global conditions change.
10.1 Political and Institutional Legacy
Within Ghana, Nkrumah is remembered both as the principal leader of independence and as a proponent of centralized, ideologically driven governance. Public memory, policy debates, and constitutional discussions often invoke his example, whether as inspiration or caution.
At the continental level, his early advocacy contributed to the creation of the Organization of African Unity and, indirectly, to the later African Union. Though his specific proposals for immediate political union were not adopted, many observers see current initiatives on regional integration, common markets, and shared infrastructure as echoing themes from Africa Must Unite.
10.2 Intellectual and Symbolic Significance
In intellectual history, Nkrumah is widely regarded as a foundational figure in Pan‑African political thought, African socialism, and the philosophy of decolonization. His concepts of Consciencism and neo‑colonialism remain reference points in discussions of ideology, identity, and global inequality.
Symbolically, he has become an emblem of radical anti‑imperialism, invoked in movements ranging from Black liberation struggles to contemporary campaigns against economic dependency and structural adjustment. At the same time, scholars and activists often revisit his record to interrogate the tensions between emancipatory goals and concentrated state power.
10.3 Ongoing Reinterpretations
Recent scholarship situates Nkrumah within wider Global South currents, comparing him to figures such as Frantz Fanon, Amílcar Cabral, and Jawaharlal Nehru. Some analysts emphasize the contemporary relevance of his warnings about financial control, resource extraction, and military intervention; others highlight the need to rethink his models of party, state, and development in light of democratic aspirations and ecological concerns.
Overall, Nkrumah’s historical significance lies not only in the institutions he helped to create, but also in the enduring debates his ideas continue to generate about the meaning of liberation, unity, and sovereignty in a still‑unequal world order.
How to Cite This Entry
Use these citation formats to reference this thinkers entry in your academic work. Click the copy button to copy the citation to your clipboard.
Philopedia. (2025). Francis Kwame Nkrumah. Philopedia. https://philopedia.com/thinkers/kwame-nkrumah/
"Francis Kwame Nkrumah." Philopedia, 2025, https://philopedia.com/thinkers/kwame-nkrumah/.
Philopedia. "Francis Kwame Nkrumah." Philopedia. Accessed December 11, 2025. https://philopedia.com/thinkers/kwame-nkrumah/.
@online{philopedia_kwame_nkrumah,
title = {Francis Kwame Nkrumah},
author = {Philopedia},
year = {2025},
url = {https://philopedia.com/thinkers/kwame-nkrumah/},
urldate = {December 11, 2025}
}Note: This entry was last updated on 2025-12-10. For the most current version, always check the online entry.