Lauren Gail Berlant
Lauren Gail Berlant (1957–2021) was an American cultural theorist whose work fundamentally reshaped how scholars and philosophers think about affect, intimacy, and politics in late capitalism. Trained in literary studies and based for most of their career at the University of Chicago, Berlant analyzed how ordinary people sustain attachments to political and economic orders that often undermine their flourishing. Their most famous concept, “cruel optimism,” names the paradoxical attraction to fantasies of the good life—such as upward mobility, stable work, or heteronormative intimacy—that are structurally impossible for many under neoliberalism. This idea has become a touchstone in political theory, moral psychology, and critical phenomenology. Berlant’s work on “intimate publics,” citizenship, and national sentiment traced how popular culture, law, and media produce affective worlds in which subjects inhabit belonging and exclusion. Their writing crossed disciplinary boundaries, informing feminist philosophy, queer theory, theories of the public sphere, and critiques of liberal individualism. Through books like The Queen of America Goes to Washington City and Cruel Optimism, as well as the co-edited Affect Theory Reader, Berlant helped reorient philosophical attention toward the ordinary, affective textures of contemporary life and the ways collective feeling shapes political possibility.
At a Glance
- Field
- Thinker
- Born
- 1957-10-31 — Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
- Died
- 2021-06-28 — Chicago, Illinois, United StatesCause: Cancer (rare form, publicly reported as a long illness)
- Floruit
- 1980–2021Active as a scholar and public intellectual in literary, cultural, and political theory.
- Active In
- United States, North America
- Interests
- Affect and emotionCitizenship and belongingNeoliberalism and late capitalismIntimacy and private lifePopulism and the public sphereSexuality and genderOrdinary life and the presentNational sentiment and fantasy
Lauren Berlant’s work argues that political life in late capitalist democracies is organized through affective attachments—often to fantasies of a good life—that are both sustaining and structurally obstructive, so that understanding contemporary power, subjectivity, and ethical possibility requires analyzing the ordinary, affect-laden scenes in which people remain bound to forms of life that damage their capacity to thrive.
The Anatomy of National Fantasy: Hawthorne, Utopia, and Everyday Life
Composed: mid-1980s–1991
The Queen of America Goes to Washington City: Essays on Sex and Citizenship
Composed: early 1990s–1997
The Female Complaint: The Unfinished Business of Sentimentality in American Culture
Composed: late 1990s–2007
Cruel Optimism
Composed: mid-2000s–2011
Affect Theory Reader
Composed: late 2000s–2010
The Hundreds
Composed: 2010s–2019
A relation of cruel optimism exists when something you desire is actually an obstacle to your flourishing.— Lauren Berlant, *Cruel Optimism* (Duke University Press, 2011), Introduction.
Berlant’s most cited definition of cruel optimism, grounding philosophical debates on how harmful attachments structure subjectivity under neoliberalism.
The political is not just what happens in legislatures, but what happens in the ongoing activity of the social, in the scenes of ordinary life.— Paraphrased from Lauren Berlant, *The Queen of America Goes to Washington City* (Duke University Press, 1997), Preface.
Expresses Berlant’s insistence that everyday affective scenes are central to understanding political power and citizenship.
The good-life fantasy is a fragile, historically specific thing, whose contours are constantly being redrawn by the forces that threaten it.— Lauren Berlant, *Cruel Optimism* (Duke University Press, 2011), Chapter 1.
Clarifies how the imagined “good life” functions as both a motivating ideal and a site of crisis in contemporary political and moral thought.
Intimate publics are defined not only by shared content but by a shared sense of emotional knowledge and emotional continuity.— Lauren Berlant, *The Female Complaint: The Unfinished Business of Sentimentality in American Culture* (Duke University Press, 2008), Introduction.
Introduces Berlant’s notion of intimate publics, influential for rethinking publics in feminist and queer philosophy and political theory.
The present is an impasse we inhabit, not a transition we simply pass through.— Paraphrased from Lauren Berlant, *Cruel Optimism* (Duke University Press, 2011), Conclusion.
Captures Berlant’s idea of the present as an ongoing impasse, shaping philosophical discussions of temporality, agency, and endurance.
Formation in Literary and Critical Theory (1970s–mid-1980s)
During undergraduate and graduate study, culminating in a PhD at Cornell in 1985, Berlant absorbed deconstruction, psychoanalysis, Marxist and feminist theory, and reader-response criticism. This period forged their commitment to close reading not only of literature but of institutions, media, and everyday life, and established the methodological blend of textual analysis with political theory that characterizes their mature work.
Nation, Sentiment, and Citizenship (late 1980s–1990s)
After joining the University of Chicago, Berlant focused on U.S. national culture, examining how sentimentality and intimacy organize citizenship. Works like *The Anatomy of National Fantasy* and *The Queen of America Goes to Washington City* analyze how public life is shaped by fantasies of private life, especially around sexuality, race, and gender, thereby challenging liberal theories that separate public reason from private feeling.
Affect, Intimacy, and Neoliberalism (2000s–early 2010s)
Berlant became a central architect of affect theory, exploring how emotions, moods, and atmospheres mediate political life. Collaborations like *Our Monica, Ourselves* and the co-edited *Affect Theory Reader*, together with monographs such as *The Female Complaint* and *Cruel Optimism*, articulate concepts of intimate publics, the impasse, and cruel optimism. These ideas reframe how philosophers and theorists understand desire, attachment, and subjectivity in late capitalist democracies.
Ordinary Life, Infrastructure, and the Present (mid-2010s–2021)
In later work, including *The Hundreds* (with Kathleen Stewart) and essays on the “infrastructure of the ordinary,” Berlant turned toward the micro-phenomenology of everyday life. They focused on how small gestures, minor experiences, and shared atmospheres embody political and ethical stakes. This phase intensified their influence on critical phenomenology, pragmatism, and new materialist and infrastructural turns in contemporary philosophy.
1. Introduction
Lauren Gail Berlant (1957–2021) was an American cultural and political theorist whose work is frequently cited across philosophy, literary studies, queer theory, and American studies. Based primarily at the University of Chicago, Berlant examined how people in late capitalist democracies live through economic precarity, political disappointment, and changing norms of intimacy, often by clinging to fantasies of “the good life” that are increasingly out of reach.
A central feature of Berlant’s thought is the claim that affect—the felt texture of everyday life, including moods, attachments, and atmospheres—is not merely private but constitutive of political and economic orders. Rather than treating politics as centered on institutions and explicit ideological commitments, Berlant foregrounded the ordinary: minor gestures, popular culture, and everyday survival strategies through which power is absorbed, resisted, or normalized.
Concepts such as cruel optimism, intimate publics, impasse, and the infrastructure of the ordinary have provided widely used vocabularies for analyzing how subjects remain attached to harmful conditions, how publics are organized around shared feeling, and how the present is experienced as a stretched-out crisis rather than a clear transition. Proponents see these concepts as offering a nuanced account of agency and attachment under neoliberalism; critics question their scope, coherence, or political efficacy.
Berlant’s interdisciplinary reach and distinctive prose style have made their work a common reference point in debates about neoliberalism, affect, citizenship, and the politics of intimate life, situating them as a key figure in contemporary critical theory.
2. Life and Historical Context
Lauren Berlant was born on 31 October 1957 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and came of age in the context of postwar U.S. prosperity, the civil rights movement, second-wave feminism, and the emergence of gay and lesbian liberation. Scholars often highlight this historical backdrop to explain Berlant’s sustained focus on citizenship, national fantasy, and the politics of sexuality and gender.
Berlant completed their PhD in English at Cornell University in 1985, during a period when deconstruction, psychoanalysis, Marxism, and feminist theory were reshaping the humanities. The “theory boom” in U.S. universities in the 1970s and 1980s provided the intellectual environment for Berlant’s early engagements with ideology critique, structuralism, and poststructuralism.
In 1989, Berlant joined the University of Chicago, an institution known for rigorous theoretical work. The late 1980s and 1990s saw the consolidation of neoliberal policy regimes in the United States and the United Kingdom, as well as the culture wars around sexuality, abortion, race, and welfare. These developments formed the immediate context for The Anatomy of National Fantasy (1991) and The Queen of America Goes to Washington City (1997), which analyze how U.S. national identity and citizenship are organized through sentimentality and images of private life.
The 2000s and 2010s, marked by financial crises, increased precarity, and the expansion of digital media, shaped Berlant’s later attention to precarity, attrition, and the sense of an ongoing present crisis. The rise of affect theory, queer theory, and new materialisms coincided with and helped to frame Berlant’s movement toward affect, ordinary life, and infrastructure as central analytical sites.
| Period | Key Historical Context | Relevance to Berlant |
|---|---|---|
| 1960s–1970s | Civil rights, feminism, gay liberation | Focus on citizenship, sexuality, national sentiment |
| 1980s–1990s | Theory boom, culture wars, neoliberalization | Early work on national fantasy and sex/citizenship |
| 2000s–2010s | Globalization, financial crises, precarity, digital media | Development of cruel optimism, impasse, affective ordinary |
3. Intellectual Development
Berlant’s intellectual development is often described in phases that track shifts in focus while retaining underlying preoccupations with affect, citizenship, and fantasy.
Formation in Literary and Critical Theory
During undergraduate and graduate study, culminating in a Cornell PhD in 1985, Berlant engaged intensively with deconstruction, psychoanalysis, Marxism, and feminist theory. Proponents emphasize that this training produced Berlant’s characteristic method: close reading of literary and cultural texts combined with attention to ideology and desire. Critics sometimes suggest that this origin in literary studies leads to an overreliance on textual interpretation for understanding social life.
Nation, Sentiment, and Citizenship
In the late 1980s and 1990s, Berlant’s work centered on U.S. national culture. The Anatomy of National Fantasy and The Queen of America Goes to Washington City argue that national identity and citizenship are organized around sentimental narratives and intimate images of private life. This phase elaborated a critique of liberal public/private distinctions and highlighted how minoritized subjects are figured within national fantasies.
Affect, Intimacy, and Neoliberalism
From the early 2000s into the early 2010s, Berlant became a major figure in affect theory. Through The Female Complaint, Cruel Optimism, and co-edited collections such as Our Monica, Ourselves and The Affect Theory Reader, Berlant shifted focus to the affective life of neoliberalism: how people remain attached to ideals of the good life amid structural attrition. Concepts such as cruel optimism, impasse, and intimate publics emerge in this period.
Ordinary Life and Infrastructure
In later work, including The Hundreds (with Kathleen Stewart) and essays on the “infrastructure of the ordinary,” Berlant turned toward micro-descriptions of everyday scenes and shared atmospheres. Supporters see this as a deepening of their earlier interest in the ordinary; some critics argue it risks aestheticizing suffering or diluting structural critique. Nonetheless, this phase consolidated Berlant’s influence on critical phenomenology and pragmatist approaches to politics.
4. Major Works
Berlant’s major works are often grouped by thematic focus but are also read as a continuous exploration of affect, citizenship, and the ordinary.
Early Monograph on National Fantasy
The Anatomy of National Fantasy: Hawthorne, Utopia, and Everyday Life (1991) analyzes Nathaniel Hawthorne’s writings to argue that U.S. national identity is sustained by literary and cultural fantasies that organize everyday life. It combines close literary analysis with a theory of national sentiment.
Sex, Citizenship, and the Public Sphere
The Queen of America Goes to Washington City: Essays on Sex and Citizenship (1997) examines how public culture in the late 20th-century U.S.—including political rhetoric, legal discourse, and media representations—figures sexuality and intimacy as central to citizenship. It is frequently cited in discussions of the politicization of private life and the cultural logics of the “intimate public sphere.”
Sentimentality and Intimate Publics
The Female Complaint: The Unfinished Business of Sentimentality in American Culture (2008) traces a long tradition of “women’s culture” and sentimental narratives. Berlant introduces the concept of intimate publics to describe affectively charged spaces in which subjects experience emotional continuity and belonging through shared stories and commodities.
Cruel Optimism and Neoliberal Precarity
Cruel Optimism (2011) is widely regarded as Berlant’s most influential book. It elaborates the concept of cruel optimism to analyze how attachments to fantasies of the good life persist when those fantasies become structurally unattainable, focusing on the affective life of neoliberal precarity.
Collaborative and Editorial Work on Affect
With Melissa Gregg, Berlant co-edited The Affect Theory Reader (2010), which gathers foundational essays in affect studies and helped institutionalize the field. With Kathleen Stewart, Berlant co-authored The Hundreds (2019), a series of short, experimentally styled pieces that depict scenes of the ordinary and have been read as both theory and poetics.
| Work | Main Focus | Key Concepts |
|---|---|---|
| The Anatomy of National Fantasy | U.S. nationhood via Hawthorne | National fantasy, utopia |
| The Queen of America Goes to Washington City | Sex and citizenship | Public/private, intimate public sphere |
| The Female Complaint | Sentimentality, women’s culture | Intimate publics, female complaint |
| Cruel Optimism | Neoliberal crisis, attachments | Cruel optimism, impasse |
| The Affect Theory Reader | Field consolidation | Affect theory, noncognitive life |
| The Hundreds | Ordinary life, atmospheres | Infrastructure of the ordinary |
5. Core Ideas and Concepts
Berlant’s work is organized around a set of interrelated concepts that scholars use across disciplines.
Cruel Optimism
Cruel optimism names a relation “when something you desire is actually an obstacle to your flourishing.” Proponents argue that this concept explains why subjects remain attached to compromised life-ideals—such as stable employment or normative family life—under neoliberalism. Some critics suggest that the notion may be too expansive, risk pathologizing ordinary hope, or blur distinctions between oppressive and sustaining attachments.
Intimate Publics
Intimate publics describe cultural formations, often organized around gendered or minoritized experiences, where individuals feel emotional belonging through shared narratives and commodities. Berlant argues that these publics blur boundaries between private feeling and public culture and can both enable critique and reproduce norms. Debate centers on whether “intimate publics” are sufficiently distinct from other notions of counterpublics and whether the framework overemphasizes consumption.
The Ordinary and Impasse
For Berlant, the ordinary is a key site of political and ethical life: the realm of habits, small adjustments, and scenes of getting by. Relatedly, impasse denotes a stretched-out present in which people are stuck, improvising forms of “lateral agency” rather than making decisive breaks. Supporters find this vocabulary helpful for capturing contemporary experiences of slow crisis; others contend that it can understate possibilities for rupture or organized political action.
Sentimentality and National Fantasy
Berlant treats sentimentality as a powerful cultural mode organizing national fantasies, particularly in the United States. Sentimental forms, they argue, mediate attachments to the nation and shape who can appear as a “proper” citizen. Some commentators praise this as a nuanced ideology critique; others worry that the focus on cultural form may marginalize material and institutional analysis.
Collectively, these concepts articulate a picture of subjects as affectively entangled with political and economic structures, living through attachments that are at once enabling and constraining.
6. Methodology and Style of Thought
Berlant’s methodology combines close textual analysis with theoretically informed cultural observation, producing a hybrid style that many readers see as distinctive.
Close Reading and Cultural Hermeneutics
Trained in literary studies, Berlant employs close reading not only on novels and films but also on legal cases, political speeches, television, and everyday scenes. Proponents argue that this enables fine-grained analysis of how power and affect are encoded in cultural forms. Critics sometimes suggest that this approach risks overinterpreting limited examples or treating them as overly representative.
Interdisciplinarity and Theoretical Synthesis
Berlant draws on psychoanalysis, Marxism, feminism, queer theory, phenomenology, and pragmatism, often weaving them together without rigid disciplinary boundaries. This synthesis is praised for generating new vocabularies (e.g., “cruel optimism,” “intimate publics”), but some commentators find the theoretical references dense or eclectic, making it difficult to place Berlant within standard philosophical traditions.
Attention to Form and Genre
A notable feature of Berlant’s work is reflexive attention to form. Books such as Cruel Optimism and The Hundreds experiment with genre, mixing theory, anecdote, and what Berlant calls “situation” or “case.” Advocates view this as aligning method with object—using open, fragmentary forms to capture the instability of the present. Detractors argue that such stylistic experimentation may reduce clarity and accessibility.
Descriptive, Nonprescriptive Orientation
Berlant’s writing tends to emphasize description and the mapping of affective worlds rather than prescriptive political programs. Proponents claim that this restraint avoids premature moralizing and respects the complexity of ordinary life. Critics, especially from more programmatic political traditions, sometimes fault Berlant for offering limited guidance on strategy, evaluation, or normativity.
Overall, Berlant’s methodology is characterized by theoretically saturated description, sensitivity to affective nuance, and a stylistic commitment to mirroring the textures of the ordinary.
7. Philosophical Relevance and Key Contributions
Although situated institutionally in literary and American studies, Berlant has had substantial impact on contemporary philosophy, particularly in political theory, feminist and queer philosophy, and affect studies.
Reframing Desire, Attachment, and Agency
The concept of cruel optimism has been widely taken up to rethink desire and agency. Political theorists and critical phenomenologists use it to explain how subjects consent to, or remain entangled with, harmful social orders without reducing them to simple false consciousness. Some philosophers, however, question whether the notion adequately distinguishes between destructive and ambivalent attachments or risks portraying subjects as trapped.
Rethinking Citizenship and the Public Sphere
Berlant’s analyses of citizenship, intimate publics, and national fantasy challenge liberal models that sharply separate public reason from private feeling. Feminist and queer philosophers have employed these ideas to argue that the public sphere is structured through gendered, racialized, and sexualized affects. Critics from more traditional public-sphere theory sometimes maintain that this emphasis on affect may downplay the role of deliberation and institutional design.
Affect-Centered Critique of Neoliberalism
Berlant contributes to philosophical understandings of neoliberalism by focusing on mood, precarity, and the impasse of the present, complementing more structural analyses of markets and governance. Proponents contend that this approach renders visible the everyday phenomenology of crisis. Others argue that it can obscure questions of political economy or collective organization.
The Ordinary as Ethical-Political Site
By arguing that power and possibility are concentrated in ordinary scenes, Berlant has influenced critical phenomenology and pragmatist ethics. Philosophers interested in vulnerability, care, and everyday life draw on Berlant to reassess where politics happens and how change emerges. Some critics, however, worry that this focus may romanticize small-scale practices or divert attention from large-scale transformation.
| Contribution | Philosophical Area | Typical Uses |
|---|---|---|
| Cruel optimism | Moral psychology, critical theory | Explaining harmful attachments and consent |
| Intimate publics | Public sphere theory, feminist philosophy | Analyzing gendered/queer publics and counterpublics |
| Impasse and the ordinary | Phenomenology, social ontology | Describing lived experience of crisis and survival |
| Affect-centered neoliberalism critique | Political philosophy, social theory | Linking mood and structure in late capitalism |
These contributions position Berlant as a central interlocutor in debates about subjectivity, affect, and politics.
8. Impact on Affect Studies and Queer Theory
Berlant is often cited as a key architect of affect studies and a major figure in queer theory, with influence extending across both fields.
Institutionalizing Affect Studies
The co-edited Affect Theory Reader (2010) is widely regarded as foundational in consolidating affect studies as an interdisciplinary field. It brought together work from cultural theory, philosophy, and social science, helping standardize a shared vocabulary for discussing affect, atmosphere, and noncognitive life. Scholars credit Berlant with foregrounding how affective attachments undergird political and economic structures, moving beyond emotion as an individual psychological state.
At the same time, some commentators argue that the consolidation of “affect theory” risks reifying a heterogeneous set of approaches, or overstating the novelty of affective analysis relative to earlier Marxist, psychoanalytic, or feminist work.
Contributions to Queer Theory
Berlant’s analyses of sexuality, national fantasy, and intimacy have been influential within queer theory. The Queen of America Goes to Washington City and essays on “intimacy” and “sex publics” explore how queer and nonnormative intimacies are incorporated into or excluded from national imaginaries. Concepts such as intimate publics have been used to analyze queer cultural formations, fandoms, and scenes.
Some queer theorists value Berlant’s emphasis on the complexity of attachment, including “cruel” forms of optimism that sustain life under hostile conditions. Others, particularly those focused on anti-normativity or radical rupture, sometimes question whether Berlant’s focus on ordinary survival and ambivalence sufficiently addresses the possibilities of refusal or abolitionist politics.
Cross-Pollination of Affect and Queer Theory
Berlant’s work exemplifies the intersection of affect studies and queer theory, highlighting how sexuality and gender are lived through affective atmospheres, not solely identities or practices. This has informed debates on queer temporality, slow death, and the politics of pleasure and harm. Critics occasionally contend that the resultant frameworks can be difficult to operationalize empirically or politically, while supporters see them as offering nuanced tools for grasping lived queer experience under neoliberalism.
9. Critiques and Debates
Berlant’s work has generated a range of critical responses and ongoing debates across disciplines.
Normativity and Political Program
A recurrent critique is that Berlant’s writing is diagnostic rather than prescriptive. Commentators from more explicitly normative or activist traditions contend that concepts like cruel optimism and impasse powerfully describe conditions but offer limited guidance for political strategy or ethical evaluation. Defenders reply that Berlant’s restraint is deliberate, aiming to avoid imposing premature solutions and instead to clarify conditions under which new politics might emerge.
Scope and Coherence of Key Concepts
Some scholars question the breadth of terms such as cruel optimism or impasse, suggesting they may become catch-all descriptors for diverse phenomena, risking conceptual dilution. Others argue that the boundary between “ordinary” hope and cruel optimism is unclear. Supporters counter that the concepts are intentionally elastic to track messy lived realities and that their utility is evident in their wide adoption.
Relation to Political Economy
Marxist and materialist critics sometimes maintain that Berlant’s focus on affect and culture can underemphasize concrete structures of class, labor, and state power. They argue that foregrounding mood and attachment might obscure the need for institutional change. Proponents respond that Berlant situates affect within neoliberal political economy and that understanding how subjects live and feel these structures is indispensable to critique.
Style and Accessibility
Berlant’s dense, metaphor-rich prose and experimental forms have been both admired and criticized. Some readers celebrate the style as appropriate to the complexity of the objects analyzed; others see it as a barrier to accessibility, especially outside specialized academic audiences.
Relation to Other Theoretical Traditions
Debates also concern Berlant’s positioning vis-à-vis psychoanalysis, phenomenology, and pragmatism. Some psychoanalytic readers see affinities but note relatively sparse engagement with canonical texts. Phenomenologists and pragmatists may welcome the focus on the ordinary while questioning the extent of explicit dialogue with their traditions. These discussions center less on refutation than on how best to situate Berlant within existing philosophical lineages.
10. Legacy and Historical Significance
Berlant’s legacy is often assessed in terms of conceptual innovation, cross-disciplinary influence, and reshaping how scholars understand the relation between affect, politics, and everyday life.
Conceptual and Field-Forming Influence
Concepts such as cruel optimism, intimate publics, impasse, and the infrastructure of the ordinary have entered the standard lexicon in cultural theory, political philosophy, and sociology. Many commentators regard Berlant as pivotal in establishing affect studies as a recognizable field and in reorienting American studies toward questions of affective life and public feeling.
Impact on Subsequent Scholarship
Berlant’s work has influenced research on neoliberalism, precarity, queer life, populism, and the politics of emotion. Scholars in critical phenomenology, feminist and queer philosophy, media studies, and urban studies draw on Berlant to analyze topics ranging from gig work to climate anxiety and digital cultures of intimacy. Some historians of theory suggest that Berlant helped mark a shift from “high theory” toward a more descriptive, scene-based critical practice centered on the ordinary.
Institutional and Pedagogical Roles
At the University of Chicago and beyond, Berlant mentored numerous students who themselves became influential scholars. Their teaching and collaborative projects—such as workshops, edited volumes, and co-authored texts—are often cited as crucial to the diffusion of affect-centered approaches.
Ongoing Debates and Reassessments
Following Berlant’s death in 2021, retrospectives and special journal issues have revisited their oeuvre, debating its long-term significance. Some commentators emphasize the enduring relevance of their account of the present as an impasse; others speculate on how changing political conditions may call for extensions or revisions of Berlant’s frameworks. These discussions suggest that Berlant’s work remains an active site of theoretical development rather than a closed system.
In this sense, Berlant’s historical significance lies not only in specific concepts but also in modeling a way of thinking that treats the textures of ordinary life as central to understanding power, attachment, and political possibility.
How to Cite This Entry
Use these citation formats to reference this thinkers entry in your academic work. Click the copy button to copy the citation to your clipboard.
Philopedia. (2025). Lauren Gail Berlant. Philopedia. https://philopedia.com/thinkers/lauren-gail-berlant/
"Lauren Gail Berlant." Philopedia, 2025, https://philopedia.com/thinkers/lauren-gail-berlant/.
Philopedia. "Lauren Gail Berlant." Philopedia. Accessed December 11, 2025. https://philopedia.com/thinkers/lauren-gail-berlant/.
@online{philopedia_lauren_gail_berlant,
title = {Lauren Gail Berlant},
author = {Philopedia},
year = {2025},
url = {https://philopedia.com/thinkers/lauren-gail-berlant/},
urldate = {December 11, 2025}
}Note: This entry was last updated on 2025-12-10. For the most current version, always check the online entry.