Manuel Castells Oliván
Manuel Castells Oliván (born 1942) is a Spanish sociologist whose theories of the "network society" and the information age have deeply influenced contemporary social and political philosophy. Educated in France after fleeing Francoist Spain, Castells drew on Marxism, structuralism, and critical theory while working with Alain Touraine on social movements. At the University of California, Berkeley, and later at the Open University of Catalonia and the University of Southern California, he developed a sweeping account of how information and communication technologies restructure capitalism, power, and everyday life. Castells’s three‑volume series "The Information Age" advanced the thesis that networks—not classes, states, or markets alone—have become the primary structures of social organization. This has shaped philosophical debates on agency, subjectivity, public space, and the conditions of democracy in technologically mediated societies. His work on identity, urban space, and digital social movements has given philosophers and critical theorists new conceptual tools for thinking about globalization, resistance, and the ethics of communication. Though not a philosopher by training, Castells stands as a central figure in 21st‑century reflections on technology, power, and meaning, bridging empirical sociology with normative concerns about human autonomy and collective life.
At a Glance
- Field
- Thinker
- Born
- 1942-02-09 — Hellín, Albacete, Spain
- Died
- Active In
- Spain, France, United States, Latin America, Global
- Interests
- Information societyNetwork societyPower and communicationSocial movementsUrban sociologyGlobalizationDigital capitalismIdentity politics
Manuel Castells argues that we have entered an "informational" or "network" society in which the primary structures of power, production, and meaning are organized through globally connected, digitally enabled networks; this transformation reconfigures capitalism, the state, identity, and social movements, demanding that philosophy rethink concepts of power, public space, subjectivity, and democracy in terms of communication flows and networked relations rather than territorially bounded institutions alone.
La Question urbaine
Composed: early 1970s (French edition 1972; English translation 1977)
The City and the Grassroots
Composed: late 1970s–1982 (published 1983)
The Rise of the Network Society
Composed: early–mid 1990s (published 1996; revised 2000, 2010)
The Power of Identity
Composed: mid 1990s (published 1997; revised 2004)
End of Millennium
Composed: mid–late 1990s (published 1998; revised 2000, 2010)
Communication Power
Composed: mid–late 2000s (published 2009)
Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age
Composed: early 2010s (1st ed. 2012; 2nd ed. 2015)
The Power of Communication
Composed: late 2000s–early 2010s (published 2013)
Our societies are increasingly structured around a bipolar opposition between the Net and the Self.— Manuel Castells, The Power of Identity, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Blackwell, 2004), p. 3.
Castells frames the central tension of the network society as a conflict between global, abstract networks and the concrete search for meaning and identity, a theme with clear philosophical implications for theories of selfhood and community.
Power is exercised by means of the construction of meaning in the human mind through processes of communication enacted in global-local networks of mass communication.— Manuel Castells, Communication Power (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), p. 3.
Here Castells conceptualizes power primarily as communicative and cognitive, inviting political philosophers to reconsider domination and resistance in terms of media structures and meaning-making processes.
The space of flows is the material organization of time-sharing social practices that work through flows.— Manuel Castells, The Rise of the Network Society, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Blackwell, 2000), p. 442.
This definition underpins Castells’s rethinking of spatial ontology in the information age, central to philosophical discussions of embodiment, place, and globalization.
Networks constitute the new social morphology of our societies, and the diffusion of networking logic substantially modifies the operation and outcomes in processes of production, experience, power, and culture.— Manuel Castells, The Rise of the Network Society, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Blackwell, 2000), p. 500.
Castells summarizes his thesis that networks are not merely tools but the basic morphology of contemporary societies, which reorients philosophical analysis from substances and institutions to relations and processes.
Without communication power, there is no power, because power relationships are dependent on the construction of meaning in the minds of the people.— Manuel Castells, Communication Power (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), p. 417.
In this normative-leaning claim, Castells underscores how the ethics and politics of communication are central to any contemporary theory of legitimacy and authority.
Formative Years under Franco and French Exile (1942–late 1960s)
Growing up under Francoist Spain and then exiled to France, Castells encountered authoritarianism firsthand while absorbing French Marxism, structuralism, and phenomenology. Studies at the University of Paris and work with Alain Touraine during May ’68 oriented him toward social movements, class struggle, and critical analyses of power, forming his lifelong interest in how dominated groups resist through culture and space.
Urban Sociology and Social Movements (1970s–mid 1980s)
In this period Castells focused on urbanization, collective consumption, and grassroots movements, especially in Latin America and Europe. Works such as "The Urban Question" and "The City and the Grassroots" developed a structural yet agency-sensitive account of cities as sites where state, capital, and everyday life intersect, contributing to debates in Marxist and critical urban theory about space, citizenship, and the right to the city.
The Information Age and the Network Society (late 1980s–early 2000s)
As digital technologies spread, Castells turned to information, communication, and globalization. The trilogies "The Information Age" and later "Communication Power" elaborated the concept of the network society, arguing that informational capitalism and global networks reconfigure labor, politics, and culture. This phase offers his most influential theoretical synthesis, widely taken up in philosophy of technology, political philosophy, and media theory.
Digital Movements, Identity, and Democracy (2000s–present)
Castells’s later work examines how networked communication shapes identity, public space, and social movements—from the Zapatistas and Arab Spring to Occupy and 15‑M. Books like "Networks of Outrage and Hope" and "Rupture" deepen his normative concerns with democracy, crisis, and legitimacy, leading into his brief political role as Spain’s Minister of Universities and ongoing reflections on knowledge, institutions, and civic autonomy in the digital era.
1. Introduction
Manuel Castells Oliván (b. 1942) is widely regarded as one of the most influential sociologists of the late 20th and early 21st centuries, especially known for theorizing the network society and informational capitalism. His work offers a comprehensive framework for understanding how digital communication technologies restructure economy, politics, culture, and everyday life, and it has become a key reference point across sociology, political science, media and communication studies, urban studies, and philosophy.
Castells’s analyses are grounded in large-scale empirical research but articulated through broad, synthetic concepts such as the space of flows, communication power, and mass self-communication. Proponents view his trilogy The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture as a foundational map of the transition from industrial to informational forms of capitalism. Critics sometimes argue that his emphasis on technological networks risks downplaying older structures such as class, state institutions, and territorial politics, yet even critics often work within his conceptual vocabulary.
A central theme running through his writings is the tension between global networks and local identities, what he famously formulates as the opposition between “the Net and the Self.” This framework has shaped debates on globalization, identity politics, and digital democracy. Although Castells does not present himself as a normative philosopher, his work is routinely used to explore questions about power, autonomy, and democratic legitimacy in technologically mediated societies.
This entry examines his life and historical setting, the development of his thought, the architecture of his major works, and the main ideas and controversies surrounding his theories of networks, power, space, and social transformation.
2. Life and Historical Context
Castells’s life is closely intertwined with major political and technological transformations of the 20th and 21st centuries. Born in 1942 in Hellín and raised in Barcelona under Francoist Spain, he experienced authoritarian rule, censorship, and rapid but uneven industrialization. Scholars often suggest that these conditions helped orient his enduring focus on power, urban space, and resistance.
In 1962 he went into political exile in France after involvement in clandestine opposition to Franco. Paris in the 1960s was a hub of French Marxism, structuralism, and existentialism, and Castells studied at the University of Paris while working with sociologist Alain Touraine. The May 1968 protests, in which he participated intellectually and organizationally, exposed him to new social movements and forms of collective action that challenged both state authority and traditional workerist politics.
From the late 1970s, his appointment at the University of California, Berkeley, placed him at another epicenter: the post‑Fordist, high‑tech transformation of California, including Silicon Valley’s rise. This context shaped his turn from urban sociology toward the study of information technologies, globalization, and new forms of capitalism.
Historically, his career spans the shift from Fordist industrial capitalism and Cold War geopolitics to globalization, the internet revolution, and the post–Cold War reorganization of state power. Commentators often read his theory of the network society as an attempt to conceptualize this broad transition, connecting deindustrializing Western cities, emerging information infrastructures, the crisis of the nation‑state, and the resurgence of identity‑based movements in a single analytical frame.
3. Intellectual Development
Castells’s intellectual trajectory is often divided into several phases, each marked by distinct problematics and methods but continuous thematic concerns with power, space, and collective action.
Early Formation in France
In the 1960s he studied under Alain Touraine and absorbed influences from Marxism, structuralism, and critical sociology. Proponents view his early work as an attempt to reconcile structural analysis of capitalism with attention to social movements and everyday practices. The events of May 1968 strengthened his interest in how new forms of collective protest challenge established institutions.
Urban Sociology and Social Movements
During the 1970s and early 1980s, Castells focused on urbanization and the state. In La Question urbaine and The City and the Grassroots he developed a structural analysis of cities as sites of “collective consumption” (housing, transport, services) and of grassroots urban movements. This period consolidated his reputation as a leading Marxist urban theorist, though some critics argued that his early structuralism underplayed culture and agency—an issue he later addressed.
Turn to Information and Networks
From the late 1980s onward, influenced by developments in information and communication technologies and by his position in California, Castells progressively shifted toward the analysis of informational capitalism and global networks. The trilogy The Information Age (1996–1998) systematized this turn, presenting the network society as a new morphology of social life.
Later Work on Communication, Movements, and Democracy
In the 2000s and 2010s, Castells refined his ideas about communication power and the role of the internet in social movements and democratic crises, while engaging more explicitly with questions of legitimacy and political institutions. Scholars see this as an increasingly normative phase, though he continues to frame his work as empirically driven social theory rather than prescriptive political philosophy.
4. Major Works
Castells’s major works form an interconnected corpus, yet each addresses a specific set of empirical and theoretical problems.
Key Books and Their Focus
| Work | Main Focus | Period Emphasized |
|---|---|---|
| La Question urbaine (The Urban Question, 1972/1977) | Marxist analysis of urbanization, the state, and “collective consumption” | Industrial/early post‑industrial cities |
| The City and the Grassroots (1983) | Cross‑cultural theory of urban social movements and urban space | 1960s–1970s grassroots struggles |
| The Rise of the Network Society (Vol. I, 1996) | Emergence of informational capitalism and network society | 1970s–1990s global restructuring |
| The Power of Identity (Vol. II, 1997) | Identity formation, social movements, and culture in the network era | New social and identity movements |
| End of Millennium (Vol. III, 1998) | Global criminal networks, the crisis of states, and development/underdevelopment | Late 20th‑century globalization |
| Communication Power (2009) | How communication networks structure power and politics | Media systems and internet age |
| Networks of Outrage and Hope (2012/2015) | Analysis of networked social movements (e.g., Arab Spring, Occupy, 15‑M) | Early 21st‑century protests |
| The Power of Communication (2013) | Synthesizing account for broader audiences of media, power, and democracy | Contemporary communication ecology |
Proponents often regard the trilogy The Information Age as his magnum opus, arguing that it integrates prior concerns with urban space and social movements into a general theory of network society. Later books such as Communication Power and Networks of Outrage and Hope are seen as extensions and updates, applying his framework to evolving media systems and political events. Some commentators, however, suggest that his earlier urban works retain a relatively autonomous importance for critical urban theory, sometimes overshadowed by his later fame as a theorist of digital networks.
5. Core Ideas: Network Society and Informational Capitalism
Castells’s central theoretical contribution is the claim that advanced societies have undergone a structural transformation toward a network society embedded in informational capitalism.
Network Society
For Castells, networks—flexible, reconfigurable systems of nodes and flows—become the dominant form of organization in economy, politics, and culture.
“Networks constitute the new social morphology of our societies…”
— Manuel Castells, The Rise of the Network Society
Key elements include:
- Network morphology: Social structures are organized as networks that can selectively connect or exclude individuals, firms, and institutions.
- Global reach and real-time coordination: Enabled by digital communication, networks operate across distances instantaneously, reshaping time and space.
- Programmability: The logic of a network is determined by “programmers” (those who set goals and norms) and “switchers” (who connect different networks), a theme developed further in his work on power.
Supporters argue this model captures empirical shifts in corporate organization, finance, media, and transnational governance. Critics contend that it may overstate novelty, suggesting continuities with earlier capitalist and imperial networks.
Informational Capitalism
Castells characterizes contemporary capitalism as informational rather than merely industrial:
- Information as key input: Knowledge generation, processing, and circulation are primary sources of productivity and profit.
- Globalized production and finance: Firms operate through global production networks and financial markets coordinated via information technologies.
- Flexible labor and segmentation: Labor markets become more precarious and polarized, with highly skilled “informational labor” contrasted to marginalized workers.
Proponents see this as an extension of Marxist value theory into the digital age; others argue that Castells under‑specifies mechanisms of exploitation and class, focusing more on organizational form than on political economy in a narrow sense. Nonetheless, network society and informational capitalism provide a widely used vocabulary for analyzing the restructuring of contemporary societies.
6. Power, Communication, and Space
Castells elaborates a distinct theory of power rooted in communication networks and a novel account of space in the information age.
Communication Power
In Communication Power, he defines power as the capacity to shape human minds via communication processes:
“Power is exercised by means of the construction of meaning in the human mind through processes of communication enacted in global-local networks of mass communication.”
— Manuel Castells, Communication Power
He emphasizes:
- Programming and switching power: Those who set the goals of networks (programmers) and connect different networks (switchers) wield power.
- Mass self-communication: Digital platforms enable individuals to create and disseminate content globally, partially escaping traditional media gatekeeping. Castells argues this opens new spaces for counter‑power, though not necessarily guaranteeing democratic outcomes.
- Interplay of mainstream media and digital networks: Political outcomes often depend on how narratives circulate and resonate across both traditional mass media and horizontal online networks.
Some theorists see affinities here with Habermasian ideas of communicative power, while others argue Castells focuses more on structural capacities than on norms of rational deliberation.
Space of Flows and Space of Places
Castells introduces a widely discussed distinction between:
| Concept | Description |
|---|---|
| Space of flows | Technologically mediated, non-contiguous networks through which capital, information, and power circulate in real time. |
| Space of places | Embodied, localized environments—neighborhoods, cities, homes—embedded in history and meaning. |
“The space of flows is the material organization of time-sharing social practices that work through flows.”
— Manuel Castells, The Rise of the Network Society
He argues that in the network society, the space of flows tends to dominate, as decisions affecting localities are made in globally connected circuits often disconnected from local concerns. Urban theorists and geographers have widely engaged this framework: some praise its conceptualization of globalization’s spatial logic, while others claim it underplays the continuing agency and resilience of place‑based politics and everyday life.
7. Identity, Social Movements, and Democracy
Castells devotes considerable attention to how identities and social movements are reshaped in the network society and what this implies for democratic politics.
Types of Identity
In The Power of Identity, he distinguishes three analytically separate but interacting forms:
| Identity Type | Definition | Function |
|---|---|---|
| Legitimizing identity | Generated by dominant institutions (e.g., states, corporations) | Stabilizes existing order |
| Resistance identity | Formed by marginalized or stigmatized groups | Defends dignity and autonomy against domination |
| Project identity | Oriented toward transforming society by constructing new values and institutions | Basis for transformative politics |
Proponents argue this triad helps explain phenomena from nationalism and religious fundamentalism to feminist and environmental movements. Critics suggest the categories can blur in practice and may not fully capture intersectional or postcolonial dynamics.
Networked Social Movements
In Networks of Outrage and Hope, Castells analyses movements such as the Zapatistas, the Arab Spring, Occupy Wall Street, and Spain’s 15‑M:
- Movements often begin online, using social media to catalyze protests.
- They create hybrid public spaces, intertwining digital communication with physical occupations of squares and streets.
- Organizational forms tend to be horizontal, leaderless, and networked, which supporters see as innovative democratic experiments, while critics highlight problems of durability, representation, and strategy.
Castells argues that mass self-communication enables rapid diffusion of emotions of outrage and hope, facilitating large‑scale mobilization without centralized organizations.
Democracy and Crisis of Legitimacy
Castells links these dynamics to a broader crisis of legitimacy in representative democracies, marked by distrust of parties, media, and state institutions. He does not prescribe a single democratic model but suggests that networked movements signal demands for more participatory, transparent, and accountable forms of governance. Political theorists debate whether his account leans toward optimism about digital empowerment or offers a more ambivalent diagnosis of fragmented, unstable public spheres.
8. Methodology and Interdisciplinary Approach
Castells’s work is noted for its methodological pluralism and interdisciplinary scope, combining empirical research with broad theoretical synthesis.
Empirical Orientation
He relies heavily on:
- Large-scale statistical data (on employment, trade, communication flows).
- Case studies across continents (e.g., Latin American urban movements, Silicon Valley, European protests).
- Comparative analysis of institutional arrangements and policy regimes.
Supporters argue that this grounding in data distinguishes his grand theorizing from more speculative social philosophy. Some critics contend that the breadth of evidence sometimes comes at the cost of depth or fine-grained ethnographic detail.
Interdisciplinary Synthesis
Castells draws on and contributes to multiple disciplines:
| Discipline | Key Influences/Connections |
|---|---|
| Sociology | Marxism, Touraine’s action theory, organizational sociology |
| Urban Studies | Critical urban theory, “right to the city,” spatial analysis |
| Communication Studies | Media systems, internet studies, public sphere debates |
| Political Science | State theory, social movements, comparative politics |
| Economics/Political Economy | Debates on post‑Fordism, globalization, informationalism |
His approach is often described as “macro‑sociological”: he seeks to identify large‑scale patterns and logics (e.g., network morphology) rather than micro‑interactional dynamics. Philosophers and theorists have both praised this for offering a comprehensive picture and questioned whether it can adequately encompass contingency, agency, and cultural specificity.
Theoretical Style
Methodologically, Castells blends:
- Conceptual innovation (e.g., network society, space of flows).
- Historical periodization (industrial vs. informational capitalism).
- Relational analysis (emphasis on networks, flows, and processes rather than fixed entities).
Some commentators situate him within traditions of grand social theory alongside thinkers like Giddens and Habermas; others view his work more as a flexible research program than a closed system, open to adaptation and critique across disciplines.
9. Impact on Philosophy and Critical Theory
Although trained as a sociologist, Castells has had significant influence on philosophy, particularly in social and political philosophy, philosophy of technology, and critical theory.
Reframing Social Ontology
The concept of the network society has encouraged philosophers to rethink social ontology in relational and systemic terms. Instead of treating states, classes, or individuals as primary units, many discussions now focus on networked relations, flows, and infrastructures. This aligns with broader turns toward relational ontology in contemporary philosophy and has influenced debates on globalization, sovereignty, and subjectivity.
Philosophy of Technology and Media
Castells’s account of informational capitalism and communication power is widely cited in philosophy of technology and media theory. Scholars use his ideas to analyze:
- The political significance of digital platforms and algorithms.
- The transformation of the public sphere under conditions of mass self‑communication.
- The ethical implications of surveillance, data extraction, and platform capitalism.
Some critical theorists argue that his primarily descriptive approach needs to be supplemented with stronger normative frameworks (e.g., Habermasian discourse ethics, neo‑Marxist critiques of commodification), while others value his work precisely for avoiding fixed philosophical agendas.
Critical Theory, Power, and Identity
Castells’s analysis of communication power intersects with traditions stemming from the Frankfurt School and Foucault. Comparisons are often drawn between:
| Theme | Castells | Related Traditions |
|---|---|---|
| Power | Embedded in communication networks and their programming | Foucault (power/knowledge), Habermas (system/lifeworld) |
| Culture & Media | Structuring of meaning via mass and networked communication | Adorno/Horkheimer (culture industry) |
| Identity | Legitimizing, resistance, project identities | Theories of recognition, poststructuralist subjectivation |
Some philosophers see his work as complementing these traditions by providing empirical breadth; others see tensions, for example between his relatively optimistic account of networked counter‑power and more skeptical views of cultural domination.
Overall, Castells’s theories function less as closed philosophical doctrines and more as conceptual toolkits adopted, revised, or contested by philosophers and critical theorists seeking to understand power, technology, and democracy in the digital age.
10. Legacy and Historical Significance
Castells’s legacy is typically assessed along three interrelated dimensions: conceptual innovation, empirical mapping of historical change, and institutional influence.
Conceptual and Historical Significance
Analysts widely credit him with providing one of the earliest and most comprehensive accounts of the transition from industrial to informational capitalism. His notions of network society, space of flows, and communication power have entered the standard vocabulary of social theory and are frequently used, even by critics, to describe late 20th‑ and early 21st‑century transformations.
Historians of ideas often place him alongside figures such as Daniel Bell, Anthony Giddens, and Jürgen Habermas as a key interpreter of the post‑Fordist and globalization eras. Supporters argue that his work offers a uniquely global, empirically rich synthesis; skeptics suggest that later developments—such as platform capitalism, big data, and AI—require significant updating or revision of his categories.
Influence Beyond Academia
Castells has also held prominent academic posts (e.g., at Berkeley, the Open University of Catalonia, the University of Southern California) and served as Spain’s Minister of Universities (2019–2021). These roles have reinforced perceptions of him as a public intellectual whose analyses intersect with policy debates on higher education, innovation, and knowledge economies.
His work has informed discussions in international organizations, urban planning, and communication policy, where concepts like informational development and networked governance are applied to concrete planning and reform efforts.
Ongoing Debates
The historical significance of Castells’s oeuvre continues to be debated. Some commentators view his theory as a foundational description of the information age, against which subsequent analyses of digital capitalism and platform power are measured. Others regard it as a transitional framework, illuminating the early internet era but less adequate to later developments such as social media monopolies and algorithmic governance.
Even where his specific theses are questioned, Castells’s insistence on analyzing power, identity, and democracy through the lens of communication networks remains a central point of reference in attempts to understand the evolving structures of contemporary societies.
How to Cite This Entry
Use these citation formats to reference this thinkers entry in your academic work. Click the copy button to copy the citation to your clipboard.
Philopedia. (2025). Manuel Castells Oliván. Philopedia. https://philopedia.com/thinkers/manuel-castells/
"Manuel Castells Oliván." Philopedia, 2025, https://philopedia.com/thinkers/manuel-castells/.
Philopedia. "Manuel Castells Oliván." Philopedia. Accessed December 11, 2025. https://philopedia.com/thinkers/manuel-castells/.
@online{philopedia_manuel_castells,
title = {Manuel Castells Oliván},
author = {Philopedia},
year = {2025},
url = {https://philopedia.com/thinkers/manuel-castells/},
urldate = {December 11, 2025}
}Note: This entry was last updated on 2025-12-10. For the most current version, always check the online entry.