Critique of Practical Reason

1. Introduction

Critique of Practical Reason (1788) is Kant’s central systematic work in ethics. It investigates how reason, independent of empirical desire, can determine what we ought to do and what we may rationally believe in connection with moral agency. Following the model of the Critique of Pure Reason, Kant subjects the faculty of practical reason—reason in its action-guiding use—to a “critique” that both limits and vindicates its claims.

Where the first Critique addressed what we can know about nature and the conditions of experience, the second Critique focuses on what we can will and which principles can bind all rational agents. Kant argues that there is a distinct use of reason, pure practical reason, that legislates a moral law a priori. This law, he maintains, grounds unconditional obligation and reveals a standpoint of freedom that theoretical cognition could not establish.

The work is not a general ethical treatise, nor a compendium of applied moral rules. Its aim is to clarify:

• what it is for reason to be practically lawgiving,
• how such a law can move finite beings like humans,
• and what ideas (such as God, freedom, and immortality) are presupposed when we take morality seriously.

Kant’s text has been read both as a consolidation of positions outlined in the Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals (1785) and as a significant reworking of them. It has also served as a reference point for later debates about autonomy, duty, and the relation between morality and religion. The following sections situate the work historically, explain its place in Kant’s critical system, and outline its structure, central arguments, and subsequent reception.

2. Historical Context

Kant composed the Critique of Practical Reason in the mid-1780s, within a rapidly changing intellectual and cultural environment in late Enlightenment Europe. The period was marked by confidence in reason and science, but also by intense debate over religion, morality, and freedom.

Intellectual Background

Several currents are especially important:

Relation to Kant’s Earlier Work

The Critique of Pure Reason (1781/1787) had challenged traditional metaphysics and limited theoretical knowledge of God, freedom, and immortality. This gave rise to concerns—pressed by both admirers and critics—about whether Kant’s critical philosophy left room for morality and religion.

The Groundwork (1785) had formulated the categorical imperative but did not yet offer a “critique” of practical reason parallel to the first Critique. The second Critique addresses an audience already aware of Kant’s epistemological restrictions and responds to contemporary doubts about the feasibility of a purely rational ethics after the demolition of dogmatic metaphysics.

Reception Context

The work appeared in a German philosophical scene increasingly focused on issues of freedom, autonomy, and the foundation of ethics. It quickly became an object of discussion among Kant’s contemporaries (such as Reinhold and, soon after, Fichte), who saw in it both a radicalization of Enlightenment morality and a novel attempt to reconcile moral obligation with a critical stance toward speculative theology.

3. Author and Composition

Kant’s Position in His Career

By the time Kant wrote the Critique of Practical Reason, he was an established professor in Königsberg and already renowned for the Critique of Pure Reason. The early 1780s were a period of intense philosophical productivity in which he was developing a comprehensive “critical” system encompassing theoretical, practical, and eventually aesthetic reason.

Genesis of the Work

Kant’s own remarks suggest that he did not originally plan a separate, full-scale critique of practical reason. After the Groundwork, he reportedly intended to move directly to a Metaphysics of Morals. However, reactions to the first Critique and ongoing misunderstandings about the status of freedom, morality, and postulates appear to have convinced him that a second Critique was needed.

Scholars often point to:

• external pressures: critical reviews, queries from colleagues, and general uncertainty about how morality fits within the limits placed on knowledge;
• internal systematic motives: Kant’s desire to show that practical reason has its own form of a priori legislation, paralleling but distinct from theoretical reason’s role in experience.

Composition and Publication

The manuscript tradition is limited; no complete autograph manuscript is extant. The standard text relies on early editions collected in the Akademie-Ausgabe, vol. 5. Modern translators and editors have noted occasional textual difficulties, but there is broad agreement about the basic wording and structure.

Kant’s Aims in Composition

In the Preface, Kant presents the second Critique as clarifying and systematizing the moral philosophy sketched in earlier writings and as correcting misinterpretations that treated his ethics as either empiricist or dogmatic. He also frames it as an inquiry into the “fact of reason” and the primacy of the practical in relation to questions about God, freedom, and immortality, themes that shape the structure of the work.

4. Place within Kant’s Critical Philosophy

The Critique of Practical Reason is the second of Kant’s three major Critiques and occupies a specific role in his architectonic.

Relation to the First and Third Critiques

The second Critique thus complements the first by identifying a domain—morality—where reason’s reach is not curtailed in the same way, even though it must still observe critical limits.

The “Primacy” of Practical Reason

A key systematic claim is the primacy of practical over theoretical reason in matters concerning the supersensible. While theoretical reason cannot know whether freedom or God exist, practical reason, through the demands of the moral law and the highest good, is said to entitle us to postulate them. This does not overturn the first Critique’s results; rather, it assigns different roles to the same ideas:

• Negative role in the first Critique: ideas of reason mark limits of possible experience.
• Positive, regulative role in the second Critique: they become conditions for the full realization of moral aims.

Function within Kant’s System of Morals

In Kant’s projected system, the second Critique provides the critical groundwork for a later doctrine of virtue and right (developed in the Metaphysics of Morals). It investigates the capacities and limits of practical reason itself, rather than cataloguing duties.

Commentators differ on how tightly the second Critique is integrated with the rest of Kant’s system: some interpret it as the decisive center of his philosophy, where the notion of autonomy reorganizes the whole; others see it as one component in a broader account where theoretical, practical, and reflective faculties each retain substantial independence.

5. Structure and Organization of the Work

The Critique of Practical Reason follows, in a compressed form, the tripartite pattern of the first Critique but adapts it to the practical domain.

Main Divisions

Analytic of Pure Practical Reason

Within the Analytic, Kant organizes the material into three chapters:

1. On the Principles of Pure Practical Reason – formulation of the moral law as a categorical imperative and discussion of its a priori character.
2. On the Concept of an Object of Pure Practical Reason – analysis of the good, evil, and the relation between moral law and ends.
3. On the Incentives of Pure Practical Reason – account of motivation, respect, and the psychological impact of the moral law.

This structure parallels the movement from principles through objects to the subjective conditions of their application.

Dialectic and Methodology

The Dialectic of Pure Practical Reason is divided into:

• Book I – On the Dialectic of Pure Practical Reason in General: examines the tension between virtue and happiness, the idea of the highest good, and the resulting postulates.
• Book II – Methodology of Pure Practical Reason (often treated as a third main part): explores how moral knowledge is to be taught, cultivated, and symbolically represented, including the role of examples and moral education.

Systematic Function of the Organization

The overall arrangement reflects Kant’s critical sequence:

1. Clarify pure principles and their concepts (Analytic).
2. Diagnose and resolve illusions arising from their use (Dialectic).
3. Indicate the correct method for employing these principles practically (Methodology).

Readers and commentators often note that, compared with the first Critique, the second is shorter and more tightly focused, with a relatively brief but thematically important Conclusion.

6. The Analytic of Pure Practical Reason

The Analytic is the first main part of the Critique of Practical Reason. Its function is to display the basic structure, principles, and key concepts of pure practical reason before turning to any dialectical problems.

Aim and Strategy

Kant seeks to show that:

• there is a pure use of practical reason, independent of empirical inclinations;
• this pure use yields a supreme principle—the moral law—that commands categorically;
• the concepts of good, evil, and duty must be understood in relation to this law, not defined prior to it;
• finite rational beings are capable of being motivated by this law.

The Analytic therefore runs from the principle of morality, through its object, to its incentive.

Chapter I: Principles

This chapter argues that the will of a rational being can be determined directly by reason through a law that holds universally and unconditionally. Kant distinguishes categorical imperatives from merely hypothetical rules tied to particular ends and presents the moral law in the second Critique’s succinct formula. The chapter also introduces the idea that the law is not derived from prior concepts of the good but is itself lawgiving for what counts as good.

Chapter II: Object of Pure Practical Reason

Here Kant investigates what counts as an object for pure practical reason. He argues that the good is what is determined as such by the moral law, rather than being identified with pleasure or happiness as such. Attempts to ground morality in empirical conceptions of happiness are criticized as incapable of delivering necessity and universality.

Chapter III: Incentives

The final chapter of the Analytic explores how the moral law can serve as a motive for finite beings. Kant introduces respect (Achtung) as the distinctive moral feeling produced by the law, analyzes the relation between duty and inclination, and sets out the notion of the fact of reason—our immediate consciousness of the law’s binding force—as the basis for acknowledging its authority.

7. The Dialectic of Pure Practical Reason

The Dialectic is the second major part of the Critique of Practical Reason. Its task is to uncover and address the tendencies of practical reason to generate conflicts, paradoxes, or illusions when it seeks a complete system of ends.

Dialectical Problem: Virtue and Happiness

Kant starts from the observation that practical reason naturally seeks not only rightness of will (virtue) but also happiness. However, experience shows no guarantee that virtue and happiness coincide. This gives rise to what Kant treats as a “antinomy” of practical reason: the apparent incompatibility between the moral law’s demand for disinterested virtue and the rational aspiration that happiness be proportionate to virtue.

The Highest Good and Its Tensions

To resolve this tension, Kant analyzes the concept of the highest good (summum bonum), understood as a state in which complete virtue is systematically connected with proportional happiness. Practical reason, he argues, necessarily demands this totality. Yet there is no empirical or purely natural ground that secures such proportionality, so reason risks overstepping its bounds by positing metaphysical guarantees.

Postulates of Practical Reason

Kant proposes that the demand for the highest good leads to certain postulates—assumptions that cannot be proved theoretically but are required from the moral standpoint:

• Freedom (already implicated in the moral law),
• Immortality of the soul (to allow endless progress toward complete virtue),
• Existence of God (as moral author of the world who can harmonize happiness with virtue).

These are not items of knowledge but conditions that practical reason is entitled to assume in order to make pursuit of the highest good rational.

Methodology of Pure Practical Reason

Often treated as part of the Dialectic, the Methodology outlines how practical reason should be employed and cultivated to avoid error and confusion. Kant discusses:

• how the moral law should be presented pedagogically,
• the limited but important role of examples and moral symbols,
• and the need for discipline in subordinating inclination to duty.

The Dialectic thus moves from diagnosing a structural tension within practical reason to articulating a critically constrained way of meeting reason’s demands through postulates and appropriate moral education.

8. Central Arguments and Doctrines

The Critique of Practical Reason articulates several interconnected doctrines. Interpretations vary on how to prioritize them, but the following are commonly treated as central.

Supremacy and Purity of Practical Reason

Kant argues that practical reason can be pure—lawgiving independently of empirical desires—and that in this domain it exhibits a kind of supremacy. Whereas theoretical reason is limited to phenomena, practical reason, through the moral law, entitles us to adopt a standpoint that refers to the noumenal self as free.

The Moral Law and the Fact of Reason

A pivotal doctrine is the “fact of reason”: the claim that we are immediately conscious of the moral law’s authority. From this “fact,” Kant maintains, we can infer:

• the reality of obligation,
• and the practical reality of freedom.

Some interpreters regard this as an appeal to a fundamental moral experience; others read it as a formal feature of rational agency.

Freedom as a Postulate

Kant contends that moral responsibility presupposes freedom in a strong, transcendental sense: the capacity to initiate causality independently of natural determination. From the standpoint of morality, we must regard ourselves as belonging to an intelligible order in which reason can determine the will according to the law.

Highest Good and Postulates of God and Immortality

Practical reason’s aspiration to the highest good—the systematic unity of virtue and happiness—is said to require the postulates of:

• Immortality, to allow endless approximation to complete virtue,
• God, as a moral governor who can establish a world where happiness is proportionate to virtue.

These postulates are doctrines of practical faith, not theoretical knowledge.

Autonomy, Respect, and Motivation

The work emphasizes autonomy of the will: the idea that moral principles originate in the rational agent’s own legislation. The distinctive moral incentive is respect for the law, a feeling that both humbles self-love and motivates obedience to duty. Kant portrays moral motivation as arising from the self-constraining yet ennobling recognition of the law’s authority.

Collectively, these doctrines present a picture in which moral obligation is grounded in pure reason, freedom is secured from the practical standpoint, and certain religious ideas are reintroduced as conditions of moral hope.

9. Key Concepts and Technical Terminology

The Critique of Practical Reason uses a specialized vocabulary, much of which is continuous with Kant’s earlier works but receives further refinement here.

Core Practical Concepts

Freedom and the Standpoint of the Agent

Kant distinguishes:

• Empirical character (how an agent appears in the world, determined by natural causes),
• Intelligible character (the agent as a free, noumenal being capable of acting from the law).

The second Critique emphasizes that from the practical standpoint we must take ourselves as free, even if theoretical knowledge of our noumenal nature is unavailable.

Motivation and Feeling

Highest Good and Postulates

• Highest good (summum bonum): Ideal totality combining complete virtue with happiness proportionate to it.
• Postulates of practical reason: Propositions (freedom, immortality, God) that cannot be proved theoretically but must be assumed from the moral point of view.

These concepts frame Kant’s attempt to describe how pure practical reason structures moral thought, motivation, and rational hope without exceeding critical limits.

10. Famous Passages and their Significance

Several passages of the Critique of Practical Reason have acquired particular prominence in scholarship and teaching.

“The starry heavens above me and the moral law within me”

In the Conclusion, Kant writes:

"

“Two things fill the mind with ever new and increasing admiration and reverence, the more often and more steadily reflection is occupied with them: the starry heavens above me and the moral law within me.”

— Kant, Critique of Practical Reason, AA 5:161–162

This passage has often been taken to encapsulate the dual orientation of human reason: toward the natural world described by science and toward the moral law that reveals our freedom and vocation. Interpreters debate whether Kant intends a contrast between insignificance and dignity, or rather an analogy between two orders governed by lawlike regularities.

The “Fact of Reason”

Another much-discussed passage introduces the fact of reason:

"

“Consciousness of this fundamental law may be called a fact of reason because one cannot reason it out from antecedent data of reason… and yet it is firmly established of itself.”

— Kant, Critique of Practical Reason, AA 5:31

This has been central to disputes about whether Kant appeals to a basic moral intuition, an inescapable feature of agency, or a kind of practical self-awareness. The phrase “fact of reason” has become a technical term in Kant scholarship.

Respect as Moral Feeling

Kant’s description of respect (Achtung) as the unique moral feeling generated by the law also contains oft-quoted lines, such as the claim that respect “humbles” self-conceit while simultaneously “elevating” the agent through awareness of the law’s authority (AA 5:73–79). These remarks have informed debates about the role of emotion in Kantian ethics.

Formulation of the Moral Law

The second Critique offers a compact formulation of the moral law:

"

“Act so that the maxim of your will can at the same time hold as a universal law.”

— Kant, Critique of Practical Reason, AA 5:30–32

Commentators compare this to the formulations in the Groundwork, discussing whether the second Critique underscores the law’s formal character, its grounding in pure reason, or its connection to the fact of reason.

Derivation of the Postulates

In the Dialectic, Kant’s derivation of the postulates of God and immortality from the demand for the highest good (AA 5:110–132) is a focal point for interpretation. Some treat this as a model of “moral theology,” while others view it as an example of the limits of rational theology even in the practical domain.

Collectively, these passages have shaped how the work is understood and have served as entry points for both sympathetic and critical engagement with Kant’s moral philosophy.

11. Kant’s Philosophical Method in the Second Critique

The Critique of Practical Reason employs a distinctive methodological approach, related to but not identical with that of the first Critique.

Critical, Not Dogmatic, Ethics

Kant presents the text as a critique rather than a system of duties. The method is:

• Transcendental in that it investigates the conditions of possibility of genuine moral obligation and practical laws that bind universally.
• Limiting in that it aims to set boundaries for what practical reason may claim, particularly regarding God, freedom, and immortality.

Instead of deriving morality from metaphysical or theological premises, Kant asks what must be presupposed if we are to make sense of ourselves as morally obligated.

From Practice to Principle: The “Fact of Reason”

Unlike in the theoretical critique, where principles are traced from the structure of experience, the second Critique appeals to the fact of reason—consciousness of the moral law—as a starting point. Methodologically, this is a move:

• from an allegedly irreducible datum of practical consciousness,
• to the articulation of the moral law and its implications (including freedom).

Commentators disagree on whether this constitutes a kind of intuitionism, a transcendental argument from the conditions of agency, or a conceptual analysis of the notion of ought.

Analytic and Dialectic

Kant divides his method into:

• an Analytic, where he dissects the concepts and principles of pure practical reason, and
• a Dialectic, where he scrutinizes reason’s tendency to generate illusions (e.g., regarding the highest good and moral-religious claims).

This mirrors the first Critique’s structure but adapts it to a domain where the chief object is not knowledge of nature but legislation for the will.

Indirect and Negative Arguments

Kant often proceeds indirectly, arguing that rival moral theories (e.g. empiricist, eudaimonistic, or theological ethics) cannot account for the unconditionality and necessity of moral obligation. He also employs negative arguments to show that speculative reason cannot prove or disprove key moral ideas, thereby opening space for their practical use.

Methodology of Moral Education

In the final part, Kant turns explicitly to methodology, discussing how the moral law should be taught and internalized. Here his method becomes partly pedagogical, emphasizing:

• the priority of clear principles over examples,
• the use of symbols to make abstract ideas accessible,
• and the cultivation of respect through disciplined reflection.

Overall, the second Critique’s method combines transcendental analysis, critique of alternatives, and a reflection on the appropriate way to cultivate and apply moral reasoning.

12. Relation to the Groundwork and Other Writings

The Critique of Practical Reason stands in close relation to the Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals and to several other Kantian texts.

Relation to the Groundwork

Some scholars see the second Critique as largely confirming and systematizing the Groundwork’s conclusions; others argue it revises the foundation by shifting from a conceptual derivation of the law to an appeal to a practical fact.

Relation to the Critique of Pure Reason

The first Critique had restricted theoretical knowledge of God, freedom, and immortality. The second Critique takes these same ideas and reinterprets them as postulates of practical reason, thereby connecting morality with a reconfigured moral theology. This relation has led to debates about whether the second Critique is merely an “application” of the first Critique’s framework or introduces a new, practically centered standpoint.

Connection with the Metaphysics of Morals

Kant later develops a detailed doctrine of duties in the Metaphysics of Morals (1797), which he introduces as based on principles elaborated in the second Critique. The relation is often described as:

• Second Critique: critique of the faculty of practical reason and formulation of its supreme principle.
• Metaphysics of Morals: application of that principle to derive concrete duties of right and virtue.

Other Relevant Writings

Kant’s short essays and religious writings interact with themes of the second Critique:

• Religion within the Bounds of Bare Reason (1793) elaborates on moral faith, radical evil, and the role of religious symbols, drawing on the notion of postulates and the highest good.
• Political essays (e.g. Perpetual Peace) presuppose the moral autonomy and freedom analyzed in the second Critique.
• Earlier lectures and essays on ethics and anthropology provide empirical background that Kant explicitly distinguishes from the pure standpoint of the second Critique.

Overall, the Critique of Practical Reason functions as both a bridge and a pivot: it links the first Critique’s critical epistemology with Kant’s later doctrine of duties and his reflections on religion and politics.

13. Reception and Early Criticisms

The early reception of the Critique of Practical Reason was mixed but influential, shaping subsequent developments in German philosophy.

Contemporary Responses

In the late 1780s and 1790s, philosophers and theologians in German-speaking Europe quickly engaged with the work.

Objections to Formalism and Empty Law

Early critics argued that Kant’s morality was overly formal and lacking substantive content. They claimed that:

• the moral law as a universal-form test could not by itself guide concrete action;
• Kant’s separation of form (law) from matter (ends) left morality abstract and potentially indifferent to human flourishing.

These objections were later developed by idealists like Hegel, but versions were voiced soon after the book’s publication.

Concerns about Freedom and the Two Standpoints

Kant’s claim that we must regard ourselves as free from the practical standpoint, while acknowledging that we cannot know ourselves as noumenally free, puzzled many early readers. Some contended that:

• this “two-standpoint” view split the self into irreconcilable parts,
• or that practical certainty of freedom was insufficient without theoretical support.

Skepticism about Postulates and Moral Theology

The derivation of God and immortality as postulates of practical reason generated significant theological discussion. Critics argued that:

• the postulates lacked rational compulsion and amounted to subjective needs;
• or, conversely, that they smuggled back in metaphysics under the guise of morality, contrary to the critical spirit.

Some Lutheran and Pietist theologians found Kant’s moral reduction of religion too rationalistic, while others welcomed the emphasis on moral faith over speculative proofs.

Influence on Early Post-Kantians

The work was a crucial point of departure for early post-Kantian thinkers:

• Fichte initially embraced and radicalized the primacy of practical reason, making the moral self the foundation of all philosophy.
• Others used Kant’s practical turn either to construct new idealist systems or to criticize his dualism of nature and freedom.

Thus, even when criticized, the second Critique set the agenda for much of late 18th- and early 19th-century German philosophy.

14. Modern Debates and Interpretive Issues

Twentieth- and twenty-first-century scholarship has raised a number of interpretive questions about the Critique of Practical Reason. Several debates are especially prominent.

The Status of the Fact of Reason

One major issue concerns how to understand the fact of reason:

• Some interpret it as a basic moral intuition or datum of conscience.
• Others see it as a transcendental claim about the conditions of agency: any rational agent must be able to act on universally valid principles.
• Still others propose a constructivist reading, treating the fact of reason as the result of reflective endorsement.

The debate centers on whether Kant is justifying morality or presupposing it.

Practical vs. Theoretical Justification of Freedom

Commentators dispute whether Kant’s practical argument for freedom provides a kind of knowledge, or merely a standpoint-relative commitment. Some hold that:

• practical reason yields a different but equally valid kind of certainty about freedom;
• others maintain that this is a pragmatic necessitation without ontological implication;
• still others argue that Kant’s view implies a subtle revision of the first Critique’s limits.

The Highest Good and Postulates

The coherence and necessity of the highest good have been much discussed:

• Some see it as central to Kant’s conception of moral hope and the link between ethics and religion.
• Critics argue that it introduces an extraneous teleology into an otherwise austere deontology.
• Others downplay its role, interpreting the postulates as optional or symbolic rather than strictly required by practical reason.

Formalism and Moral Content

Debates continue over whether Kant’s moral law in the second Critique is empty or whether it implicitly carries substantive values (e.g. respect for persons, non-contradiction in willing). Neo-Kantian and analytic interpreters have proposed various strategies for deriving richer content from the law’s form, while critics maintain that concrete norms must enter from outside.

Moral Psychology and Motivation

Scholars also question whether Kant’s account of respect and the subordination of inclination captures the complexity of moral psychology. Some read Kant as allowing a richer role for sentiment and character formation within the constraints of autonomy; others see his view as overly intellectualist.

These debates reflect broader questions about normativity, agency, and the interface between morality and religion, ensuring that the second Critique remains a central reference point in contemporary moral philosophy.

15. Legacy and Historical Significance

The Critique of Practical Reason has had a lasting impact on both the history of philosophy and contemporary ethical theory.

Influence on Post-Kantian Philosophy

The work significantly shaped German Idealism:

• Fichte drew on its emphasis on practical reason and autonomy to construct a system centered on the self’s moral activity.
• Schelling and Hegel engaged critically with Kant’s dualism of nature and freedom, often targeting themes articulated in the second Critique, such as the formal character of the moral law and the postulates.

In the nineteenth century, debates about freedom, duty, and moral faith continued to reference Kant’s second Critique as a benchmark.

Role in Modern Ethical Theory

In the twentieth century, the work contributed to the revival of deontological ethics and the concept of autonomy:

The notions of moral law, respect, and rational postulates have informed ongoing debates about moral realism, constructivism, and the nature of normativity.

Impact on Philosophy of Religion

Kant’s idea that belief in God and immortality may be morally justified without being demonstrable has played a crucial role in modern philosophy of religion. It has inspired discussions of:

• moral arguments for God’s existence,
• the distinction between theoretical and practical rationality in faith,
• and the possibility of a religion “within the bounds of bare reason.”

Broader Cultural Significance

The famous image of the “starry heavens above” and the “moral law within” has entered general intellectual culture as a succinct expression of human beings’ dual orientation toward nature and morality. The work’s emphasis on autonomy and dignity continues to resonate in legal, political, and human-rights discourses.

Overall, while often read alongside the Groundwork, the Critique of Practical Reason has provided the principal systematic account of Kant’s moral philosophy. It has served as a touchstone for discussions of the scope of reason, the foundations of obligation, and the relation between ethics, freedom, and rational faith.