Dynamics of Faith is a concise theological‑philosophical exploration of what faith is, how it functions in human life, and how it is distorted. Tillich defines faith as the state of being ultimately concerned, analyzes its cognitive, volitional, and emotional dimensions, distinguishes true faith from idolatrous or fanatical substitutes, and interprets traditional Christian doctrines—revelation, symbol, doubt, and courage—in terms of this existential structure of ultimate concern. The work serves as an accessible introduction to Tillich’s broader ‘method of correlation’ between existential questions and Christian answers.
At a Glance
- Author
- Paul Tillich
- Composed
- 1956–1957
- Language
- English
- Status
- original survives
- •Faith as ultimate concern: Tillich’s central thesis is that faith is not mere belief in propositions but the state of being ultimately concerned with that which demands unconditional seriousness and promises ultimate fulfillment; whatever functions as a person’s ultimate concern—religious or secular—constitutes their faith.
- •Faith’s multidimensional structure: The act of faith unites cognitive, volitional, and emotional elements; it includes an awareness of the object of ultimate concern, an act of commitment and courage toward it, and an element of ecstatic participation that transcends purely rational control without abandoning reason entirely.
- •Idolatry and the demonic: Faith becomes distorted when finite realities—nation, success, ideology, church, or literal doctrines—are elevated to the status of the ultimate; such idolatrous faith is ‘demonic’ because it absolutizes something conditioned and leads to fanaticism, self‑destruction, and the destruction of others.
- •Faith, doubt, and courage: Genuine faith includes doubt as an expression of the finitude and risk involved in every ultimate concern; the courage to accept this doubt—not to flee into rigid certainty or despair—is part of authentic faith, which stands between fanatical certainty and cynical skepticism.
- •Symbol and revelation: Religious language and doctrines function symbolically, participating in and pointing beyond themselves to the ultimate; revelation is not the delivery of inerrant information but the event in which the ultimate ground of being discloses itself through symbols in history, culture, and personal experience.
Dynamics of Faith has become one of Paul Tillich’s most influential and widely read works, serving as a concise gateway to his larger ‘systematic theology.’ Its definition of faith as ultimate concern has entered the broader vocabulary of theology, religious studies, and even sociology and psychology of religion. The book helped shape mid‑20th‑century liberal and neo‑orthodox Protestant thought, influenced later discussions about secular faiths and political religions, and continues to be used in interfaith and philosophy‑of‑religion contexts to analyze belief, doubt, and idolatry. Its focus on the symbolic and existential character of religious language anticipates later hermeneutical and post‑liberal approaches.
1. Introduction
Dynamics of Faith is a short theological‑philosophical essay in which Paul Tillich proposes a distinctive account of faith as “the state of being ultimately concerned.” First delivered as popular lectures and radio talks and then revised for publication in 1957, the work aims to explain religious faith in terms that are intelligible both to believers and to those who regard themselves as “secular.”
Tillich addresses questions about what faith is, how it differs from belief or emotion, and how it can claim truth without competing with science. The book analyzes the structure of faith (its cognitive, volitional, and emotional dimensions), the possible distortions of faith (idolatry and the “demonic”), and the role of symbols and revelation in expressing ultimate concern. It also examines the relation between faith and doubt, arguing that uncertainty belongs inside, rather than outside, genuine faith.
The work is often treated as a concise entry point into Tillich’s broader theology, especially his attempt to correlate existential questions (anxiety, meaning, finitude) with religious answers drawn from the Christian tradition. At the same time, it has been used across religious studies, philosophy, and sociology of religion because its definition of faith is intended to apply not only to explicit religious commitments but also to secular “ultimate concerns” such as nation, success, or progress.
2. Historical and Intellectual Context
Dynamics of Faith emerged in the mid‑1950s, at the intersection of post‑war disillusionment, the rise of existential philosophy, and debates within Protestant theology about modernity and secularization. Tillich wrote as a German‑American theologian shaped by World War I, the Weimar crisis, opposition to Nazism, and subsequent exile in the United States.
Post‑war and Cold War setting
After 1945, many Western thinkers sought to understand the appeal of fascism and totalitarian ideologies. Tillich interpreted these movements as political “faiths” in which finite realities were absolutized. The book’s focus on idolatrous and “demonic” faith can be read against this background of mass movements and ideological rivalry in the early Cold War.
Philosophical and theological currents
Tillich’s argument engages several contemporary currents:
| Current | Relevance for Dynamics of Faith |
|---|---|
| Existentialism (Kierkegaard, Heidegger, Sartre) | Provided concepts of anxiety, finitude, and authenticity that inform Tillich’s account of ultimate concern. |
| Neo‑orthodoxy (Barth, Brunner) | Shared a criticism of liberal optimism but differed on method; Tillich’s symbolic and philosophical approach contrasts with Barth’s emphasis on revelation’s sheer otherness. |
| Liberal Protestantism | Earlier efforts to reconcile Christianity with culture shaped Tillich’s concern to make faith intelligible to modern reason, while he also criticized liberal reductions of faith to ethics or feeling. |
| Scientific naturalism and secularism | The prestige of science and skepticism toward metaphysics led Tillich to distinguish empirical truth from the existential truth claims of faith. |
Institutional context
The lectures that became Dynamics of Faith were delivered while Tillich taught at Union Theological Seminary and Harvard. The work reflects efforts within mid‑20th‑century American theology to converse with philosophy, psychology of religion, and the social sciences while addressing a broad, educated public.
3. Author and Composition
Paul Tillich (1886–1965) was a Lutheran pastor, philosopher, and systematic theologian, educated in Germany and later teaching in the United States. His experience as a chaplain in World War I, his opposition to the Nazi regime, and his subsequent emigration in 1933 significantly shaped his reflections on faith, ideology, and the “demonic.”
Tillich’s intellectual profile
Tillich’s work spans:
- Academic systematic theology, especially his three‑volume Systematic Theology
- Philosophical essays on ontology, culture, and art
- Public lectures and broadcasts aimed at non‑specialists
Dynamics of Faith belongs primarily to this last category, condensing themes from his more technical writings into accessible form.
Genesis and composition of Dynamics of Faith
The book grew out of a series of lectures and radio addresses in the mid‑1950s, when Tillich was already a well‑known public intellectual in the United States.
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Occasion | Popular lectures and broadcasts given mainly at Harvard and in broader public forums. |
| Audience | Educated non‑specialists, including people skeptical of traditional religion. |
| Revision process | Tillich reworked oral material into six compact chapters, simplifying terminology but preserving his characteristic concepts (e.g., ultimate concern, ground of being). |
| Publication | First published in 1957 by Harper & Brothers in New York; later reissued in various HarperOne/HarperCollins formats. |
Scholars often note that the work functions as a concise companion to Tillich’s Systematic Theology, offering a concentrated statement of his view of faith without the full apparatus of academic theology.
4. Structure and Organization of the Work
Dynamics of Faith is organized into six relatively brief parts, each addressing a specific aspect of faith while building on the preceding discussion.
| Part | Title | Primary Focus |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | What Faith Is | Defines faith as “ultimate concern” and analyzes its total, unconditional character. |
| 2 | What Faith Is Not | Distinguishes faith from common misunderstandings such as mere belief, subjective feeling, or irrational assent. |
| 3 | The Sources of Faith | Examines psychological, social, and historical origins of faith and its secular as well as religious forms. |
| 4 | The Truth of Faith | Discusses how faith can make truth claims, the role of doubt, and the difference between empirical and existential truth. |
| 5 | Symbols of Faith | Develops a theory of religious symbols and their participation in the reality of the ultimate. |
| 6 | The Life of Faith | Explores how faith is lived amid finitude, anxiety, ethics, and culture. |
Progression of argument
The arrangement follows a conceptual sequence:
- Definition and clarification (Parts 1–2): Tillich first proposes a positive definition of faith, then corrects misinterpretations that could obscure this definition.
- Origin and validation (Parts 3–4): He then asks where faith comes from and how its claims to truth can be understood.
- Expression and existence (Parts 5–6): Finally, he treats the symbolic language through which faith is articulated and the concrete existence shaped by ultimate concern.
This pattern reflects Tillich’s broader “method of correlation,” moving from human questions (what, whence, and how true is faith?) to the structures through which faith addresses these questions (symbols and lived life).
5. Central Arguments and Key Concepts
The core of Dynamics of Faith is Tillich’s definition of faith and his analysis of its structure, distortions, and modes of expression.
Faith as ultimate concern
Tillich’s foundational claim is:
“Faith is the state of being ultimately concerned.”
— Paul Tillich, Dynamics of Faith
Ultimate concern is characterized by unconditional seriousness, total involvement of the person, and a promise of ultimate fulfillment. Proponents of Tillich’s approach argue that this definition covers both traditional religions and secular commitments that function with similar ultimacy.
Multidimensional structure of faith
Tillich describes faith as uniting:
- Cognitive elements: awareness of and reflection on the object of ultimate concern
- Volitional elements: decision, commitment, and courage
- Emotional/“ecstatic” elements: being grasped or taken beyond oneself, without abandoning reason
This view is contrasted with approaches that reduce faith to mere belief, moral will, or feeling.
Idolatry and the demonic
A major argument concerns idolatrous faith, where finite realities (nation, success, ideology, church, or doctrinal formulations) are elevated to ultimacy. Tillich terms such distortions “demonic” because they absolutize the finite and tend, in his view, toward fanaticism and self‑destruction. Scholars frequently connect this theme with analyses of political religions and totalitarian movements.
Faith, doubt, and truth
In Tillich’s scheme, doubt is an intrinsic element of faith, reflecting the risk involved in every ultimate concern. He distinguishes the truth of faith—existential, symbolic, and related to the grasp of the “ground of being”—from empirical or logical truth. Critics contend that this may blur boundaries between truth and personal commitment, while supporters see it as preserving the specificity of religious claims.
Symbols and the ground of being
The concept of religious symbols is central: symbols both point to and participate in the reality of the ultimate. Doctrines, rituals, and images are treated as symbolic languages of faith, oriented to God as the ground of being rather than a highest individual being. This symbolic and ontological framework shapes Tillich’s reinterpretation of traditional Christian themes within the dynamics of ultimate concern.
6. Legacy and Historical Significance
Dynamics of Faith has played a notable role in 20th‑ and 21st‑century discussions of religion, theology, and culture.
Immediate reception
Upon publication, the book quickly became a widely read introduction to Tillich’s thought.
| Reception Aspect | Typical Reactions |
|---|---|
| Mainline Protestant theology | Many welcomed its existential reinterpretation of faith and its accessibility for congregations and students. |
| Conservative and evangelical circles | Critics argued that Tillich’s symbolic reading of doctrine weakened traditional beliefs about God and revelation. |
| Philosophy and religious studies | Scholars used the “ultimate concern” framework to analyze secular ideologies and personal commitments. |
Long‑term influence
Over time, the work has been regarded as one of Tillich’s most influential texts:
- In theology, it helped shape post‑war liberal and neo‑orthodox conversations, especially around faith, doubt, and the critique of idolatry.
- In religious studies and sociology of religion, Tillich’s broad notion of faith informed debates about “civil religion,” nationalism, and political ideologies as quasi‑religious.
- In philosophy of religion, his treatment of symbols and the “ground of being” contributed to later hermeneutical and post‑liberal approaches that emphasize interpretation and narrative over propositional certainty.
Ongoing debates
The book continues to be discussed for both its insights and its ambiguities. Supporters highlight its nuanced integration of doubt into faith and its analysis of destructive forms of devotion. Critics question the vagueness of “ultimate concern” and the status of God as ground of being. Despite these disagreements, Dynamics of Faith remains a common point of reference in contemporary work on the concept of faith and on the religious dimensions of secular commitments.
How to Cite This Entry
Use these citation formats to reference this work entry in your academic work. Click the copy button to copy the citation to your clipboard.
Philopedia. (2025). dynamics-of-faith. Philopedia. https://philopedia.com/works/dynamics-of-faith/
"dynamics-of-faith." Philopedia, 2025, https://philopedia.com/works/dynamics-of-faith/.
Philopedia. "dynamics-of-faith." Philopedia. Accessed December 11, 2025. https://philopedia.com/works/dynamics-of-faith/.
@online{philopedia_dynamics_of_faith,
title = {dynamics-of-faith},
author = {Philopedia},
year = {2025},
url = {https://philopedia.com/works/dynamics-of-faith/},
urldate = {December 11, 2025}
}