Moses and Monotheism
Moses and Monotheism is Freud’s speculative historical-psychoanalytic study of the origins of Judaism and monotheism. Freud argues that Moses was originally an Egyptian nobleman and follower of the monotheistic Aten religion of Pharaoh Akhenaten. According to Freud, Moses imposed a strict, abstract monotheism upon a group of Semitic people, who later murdered him in a revolt. The repression and partial return of the collective guilt over this primal crime, he suggests, shaped the later development of Jewish religion, its ethical rigor, its concept of a single, invisible God, and even Christian reinterpretations of Judaism. The book combines historical conjecture, textual criticism, anthropology, and psychoanalysis to propose that religious traditions preserve, in distorted form, the memory of deep traumatic events that structure collective identity.
At a Glance
- Author
- Sigmund Freud
- Composed
- 1934–1938
- Language
- German
- Status
- original survives
- •Moses as an Egyptian: Freud contends that Moses was not ethnically Hebrew but an Egyptian aristocrat or high official, likely influenced by Akhenaten’s monotheistic cult of Aten. On this basis, he argues that the core of Israelite monotheism was originally an Egyptian religious innovation transmitted to a Semitic people by Moses.
- •Murder of Moses and collective guilt: Freud hypothesizes that Moses was killed by the very people he had led and taught, in a rebellion against his severe law and religious demands. This murder was repressed but left an unconscious sense of guilt in the people, returning symbolically in later religious ideas, commandments, and rituals.
- •Monotheism as internalization of the father: Extending his theory of the Oedipus complex, Freud interprets monotheism as an intensified internalization of the father figure. The single, invisible, omnipotent God represents a sublimated father, with the Jewish people bound by both devotion and unconscious guilt linked to the primal act of parricide.
- •Tradition as screen-memory: Freud maintains that religious doctrines and historical traditions operate like screen-memories in the individual: they disguise and partially reveal an underlying traumatic truth. The stories of Moses, the Exodus, and covenant preserve in altered, mythicized form the repressed historical events of Moses’ Egyptian origin and subsequent murder.
- •Long-term latency and return of the repressed in cultural history: Drawing an analogy between neurosis and cultural development, Freud posits that there can be long periods of latency between a historical trauma and its later symbolic expression. He uses this model to explain the delayed crystallization of strict Jewish monotheism and the emergence of Christianity as a new reworking of the old, unresolved guilt over the murder of a founding father-figure.
Although rarely accepted as credible historiography, Moses and Monotheism has been enormously influential in debates about psychoanalysis, religion, and collective memory. It stands as a culminating statement of Freud’s cultural theory, extending the logic of Totem and Taboo to the founding events of Judaism and indirectly to Christianity. The work helped inaugurate later discussions of trauma, transgenerational memory, and the psychology of religious belief. It has influenced thinkers in philosophy, theology, biblical studies, anthropology, and literary theory, including authors such as Jan Assmann and Jacques Derrida, who engage critically with Freud’s figure of Moses and his understanding of monotheism. The book also occupies a central place in reflections on Jewish identity in the 20th century, particularly concerning assimilation, antisemitism, and the paradoxical status of the Jewish people in European culture.
1. Introduction
Moses and Monotheism is Sigmund Freud’s last major work, published in 1939, in which he applies psychoanalytic theory to the origins of Judaism and the emergence of monotheistic religion. The treatise advances a speculative reconstruction of the figure of Moses and the development of Israel’s God, combining textual criticism, comparative religion, anthropology, and clinical concepts.
Freud’s central claim is that religious traditions may preserve, in highly displaced forms, the memory of ancient traumas. He reads the biblical stories of Moses and the Exodus as distorted recollections of deeper historical events, arguing that these buried memories shaped Jewish religious identity and, indirectly, Christianity.
The work stands at the intersection of several domains:
| Domain | Relevance in Moses and Monotheism |
|---|---|
| Psychoanalysis | Extension of concepts like repression and the Oedipus complex |
| History of religion | Hypotheses about the rise of strict, imageless monotheism |
| Jewish studies | Reflections on Jewish origins, identity, and persecution |
| Cultural theory | Model of collective memory and long-term cultural latency |
Because Freud combines conjectural history with psychoanalytic interpretation, the text has been both influential and controversial. It is often treated as a culminating statement of his views on religion, memory, and the psychological underpinnings of monotheism.
2. Historical Context and Publication
2.1 Political and Cultural Setting
Moses and Monotheism was conceived and written during a period marked by the rise of European fascism, virulent antisemitism, and the disintegration of the liberal culture in which Freud had lived. The Nazi annexation of Austria in 1938 forced Freud, an Austrian Jew, to leave Vienna for London, where he completed and saw the work into print.
Many commentators suggest that the book’s preoccupation with persecution, identity, and the resilience of Jewish tradition is inseparable from this context. The impending catastrophe of European Jewry forms an implicit backdrop to Freud’s attempt to rethink Jewish origins and the nature of religious hostility.
2.2 Publication History
The text was first published in stages:
| Year | Venue / Form | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| 1937 | Imago (German émigré journal) | First essay on Moses’ Egyptian identity |
| 1938 | Imago | Further essays developing the thesis |
| 1939 | Book form, German (London) | Revised and unified version |
| 1964 | English in the Standard Edition (vol. 23) | Jones/Strachey translation, now standard in English |
The work appeared to a relatively small, educated readership, overshadowed by the outbreak of World War II. Early reception was shaped by theological, historical, and political sensitivities, with many Jewish and Christian readers perceiving Freud’s hypotheses as particularly provocative at a moment of acute vulnerability for European Jews.
3. Author and Composition
3.1 Freud’s Intellectual Position
By the mid‑1930s, Freud was an established, though contested, figure in European intellectual life. He had already developed the key components of psychoanalysis—unconscious processes, repression, the Oedipus complex—and had applied them to religion in works such as The Future of an Illusion and Totem and Taboo. Moses and Monotheism extends this trajectory, focusing on Jewish tradition and its founding figure.
Freud’s own secular Jewish background is often seen as relevant. He identified culturally as Jewish while remaining religiously distanced, and some interpreters argue that the book reflects both his attachment to and critical stance toward Judaism.
3.2 Stages of Composition
The work emerged in distinct phases:
| Phase | Features |
|---|---|
| Early drafts (c. 1934) | Initial reflections on Moses’ identity and monotheism |
| Imago essays (1937–8) | Three essays presenting core theses in serial form |
| Book revision (1938–9) | Integration, partial reordering, and theoretical expansion |
Freud repeatedly revised the material, sometimes softening categorical claims while preserving the speculative framework. Scholars note that the later, more theoretical sections reveal his ongoing effort to connect concrete historical conjectures with broader psychoanalytic models of memory and tradition. The text thus reflects both his late style and his attempt to synthesize decades of work on religion and culture in the shadow of exile and illness.
4. Structure and Main Themes
4.1 Overall Structure
The book is organized into three main parts, each combining historical conjecture with psychoanalytic interpretation:
| Part | Title | Primary Focus |
|---|---|---|
| I | “Moses an Egyptian” | Argument that Moses was of Egyptian, not Hebrew, origin |
| II | “If Moses Was an Egyptian…” | Consequences of that thesis for Israelite history |
| III | “Moses, His People and Monotheistic Religion” | Theoretical synthesis: memory, neurosis, and religion |
Each part revisits earlier claims, often restating them in more tentative or more explicitly psychoanalytic terms, so that the text oscillates between historical reconstruction and theoretical generalization.
4.2 Recurrent Themes
Across the three parts, several themes recur:
- Origins and identity: The ethnic and cultural origin of Moses and its bearing on Jewish self-understanding.
- Violence and founding events: The possibility of a hidden crime or trauma at the root of religious traditions.
- Repression and cultural memory: The analogy between individual neurosis and the long-term development of religious ideas.
- Law, guilt, and moral rigor: The distinctive ethical and legalistic character Freud attributes to Jewish monotheism.
- Relation to Christianity: The transformation and reworking of Jewish themes in Christian doctrines of salvation and atonement.
These themes are developed unevenly: Part I emphasizes historical and philological reasoning, Part II blends narrative reconstruction with psychological motifs, and Part III foregrounds theoretical issues of latency, transmission, and the structure of monotheistic belief.
5. Central Arguments and Concepts
5.1 Key Historical-Analytical Claims
Freud’s reconstruction rests on several interrelated theses:
| Claim | Content (brief) |
|---|---|
| Moses as Egyptian | Moses was an Egyptian noble or official, not a Hebrew |
| Link to Atenism | Mosaic monotheism derives from Akhenaten’s Aten cult |
| Dual origins of Israelite religion | Later Yahwism fuses Mosaic monotheism with a tribal deity |
| Murder of Moses | Moses was killed by his followers in a rebellion |
Proponents of Freud’s approach emphasize how these claims attempt to explain discontinuities and tensions in the biblical narratives; critics question the evidential basis and methodological leap from textual hints to detailed historical scenarios.
5.2 Psychoanalytic Concepts in Cultural Form
Freud imports clinical concepts into the analysis of religion:
- Oedipus complex and father-murder: Monotheism is interpreted as a reconfigured relation to an idealized, prohibiting father, with the hypothesized killing of Moses echoing the primal parricide theorized in Totem and Taboo.
- Repression and latency (cultural): Traumatic events are said to be collectively repressed, with their effects emerging only after long delays in transformed religious doctrines and rituals.
- Screen-memory: Biblical traditions about Moses and the Exodus are treated as “screen-memories” that both conceal and hint at an underlying, more disturbing history.
Supporters regard these concepts as illuminating analogies for cultural processes; opponents argue that they risk reducing complex religious phenomena to psychodynamic schemas.
6. Legacy and Historical Significance
6.1 Immediate and Long-Term Reception
Upon publication, Moses and Monotheism was widely regarded as Freud’s most speculative and contentious work. Theologians and biblical scholars generally rejected its historical claims, viewing its portrayal of Moses’ Egyptian origin and murder as insufficiently supported. Within psychoanalysis, some welcomed its bold extension of analytic theory to culture, while others feared it would undermine the discipline’s scientific credibility.
Over time, the book has been less valued as historiography than as a provocative cultural and theoretical document. It remains a touchstone in debates over the legitimacy of psychoanalytic interpretations of religion and history.
6.2 Influence on Later Thought
The text has informed several fields:
| Field | Modes of Influence |
|---|---|
| Jewish studies | Reflections on Jewish memory, identity, and assimilation |
| History of religion | Discussions of the distinctiveness and “trauma” of monotheism |
| Cultural memory | Models of transgenerational transmission of trauma |
| Philosophy/theory | Analyses of archive, tradition, and the unconscious (e.g., Derrida) |
Thinkers such as Jan Assmann, Yosef Hayim Yerushalmi, David Bakan, and Jacques Derrida have engaged closely with the work, variously critiquing its historical conjectures while drawing on its insights about memory, repression, and the ambivalent legacy of monotheism. As a result, Moses and Monotheism is often treated as a pivotal late statement in Freud’s oeuvre and a significant—if controversial—contribution to 20th‑century reflections on religion and identity.
How to Cite This Entry
Use these citation formats to reference this work entry in your academic work. Click the copy button to copy the citation to your clipboard.
Philopedia. (2025). moses-and-monotheism. Philopedia. https://philopedia.com/works/moses-and-monotheism/
"moses-and-monotheism." Philopedia, 2025, https://philopedia.com/works/moses-and-monotheism/.
Philopedia. "moses-and-monotheism." Philopedia. Accessed December 11, 2025. https://philopedia.com/works/moses-and-monotheism/.
@online{philopedia_moses_and_monotheism,
title = {moses-and-monotheism},
author = {Philopedia},
year = {2025},
url = {https://philopedia.com/works/moses-and-monotheism/},
urldate = {December 11, 2025}
}