Rights of Man is Thomas Paine’s two-part defense of the French Revolution and a systematic articulation of natural, equal political rights, popular sovereignty, representative government, and social welfare. Part I replies to Edmund Burke by arguing that hereditary monarchy and aristocracy are illegitimate, that governments derive authority only from the people, and that revolutions are justified when governments violate natural rights. Part II deepens the philosophical argument, offering a general theory of government, a critique of hereditary privilege and war, and an early program of social democracy that includes progressive taxation, old-age pensions, education, and poverty relief, all grounded in the principle that each generation has the right to remake its political institutions.

At a Glance

Quick Facts

Author: Thomas Paine
Composed: 1790–1792
Language: English
Status: copies only

Key Arguments

•Natural and equal political rights: Paine maintains that all men are born with natural, inalienable rights—particularly liberty, security, and the ability to participate in government—and that no generation can surrender these rights on behalf of future generations. Political authority is legitimate only when it protects these rights and rests on the consent of the living people.
•Illegitimacy of hereditary monarchy and aristocracy: Paine argues that hereditary rule is a form of usurpation, since no family can have a natural right to govern others and no dead generation can bind the living to a particular dynasty or constitution. Kings and hereditary nobles add nothing to the political capacity of a nation and instead perpetuate corruption, war, and inequality.
•Justification of revolution and the right to alter government: Against Burke’s reverence for historical continuity and tradition, Paine insists that people may lawfully alter or abolish any government that fails to secure their rights. Revolutions such as the American and French are legitimate exercises of a universal right of resistance to despotism, not violations of an organic constitution.
•Representative democracy and written constitutions: Paine defends representative democracy as the only legitimate form of modern government. He stresses that a nation must first form itself as a people and then create a written constitution that defines, limits, and authorizes government; governments are mere agents or delegates, not sovereign entities in their own right.
•Social welfare, taxation, and economic justice: In Part II, Paine develops a detailed program of redistributive public policy. Arguing that property rights are limited by obligations to society and by the injustices of hereditary privilege, he proposes progressive taxation, public education, support for the poor and unemployed, family allowances, and pensions as duties of a just republic to secure citizens’ material independence and dignity.

Historical Significance

Historically, Rights of Man stands as one of the foundational texts of modern democratic republicanism and rights discourse. It translated the ideals of the American and French Revolutions into a powerful, accessible defense of popular sovereignty, equal citizenship, and written constitutions, contributing significantly to debates about parliamentary reform in Britain and shaping later democratic movements in Europe and America. Its proposals for progressive taxation and social welfare mark an early articulation of social-democratic and welfare-state ideas. The work helped establish the language of ‘rights’ as central to political legitimacy and continues to influence discussions of human rights, constitutionalism, and distributive justice.

Famous Passages

Critique of hereditary monarchy as ‘ignorance and imposture’(Part I, early chapters responding to Burke’s praise of monarchy)

‘Every age and generation must be as free to act for itself…’(Part I, discussion of the rights of the living versus the authority of the dead)

Distinction between society and government(Part I, often cited in the opening theoretical sections on political principles)

Program of social welfare and progressive taxation(Part II, near the end, in the practical proposals for reform and the ‘Conclusion’)

Defense of the French Revolution and comparison with the American Revolution(Part I, central chapters; reiterated and expanded in early chapters of Part II)

Key Terms

Natural rights: In Paine’s usage, universal and inalienable rights that individuals possess by virtue of being human, prior to and independent of any government or positive law.

Hereditary monarchy: A system in which the office of king or queen is passed down within a family line; Paine condemns it as an illegitimate usurpation of the people’s right to choose their governors.

Popular sovereignty: The principle that ultimate political authority resides in the people as a whole, who alone can authorize and alter the form of government through a [constitution](/terms/constitution/).

Constitution (written constitution): For Paine, a formally adopted, written framework created by the people that establishes and limits government, distinct from the day-to-day acts of any legislature or ruler.

Society vs. government: Paine’s distinction in which society arises from human needs and mutual benefit and is inherently good, whereas government is a necessary but coercive institution created to restrain vices.

1. Introduction

Rights of Man is a two-part political treatise by Thomas Paine, published in 1791 and 1792, that develops a theory of natural rights, popular sovereignty, and representative government while defending the French Revolution against conservative criticism. Written in direct reply to Edmund Burke’s Reflections on the Revolution in France (1790), it combines philosophical argument, constitutional theory, and concrete policy proposals.

Paine frames the work as an attempt to show that political institutions are legitimate only insofar as they protect the equal rights of all human beings, and that no generation can permanently bind its successors to any particular form of government or ruling dynasty. He contrasts hereditary monarchy and aristocracy with governments founded on written constitutions that derive authority from the people.

Because it addressed complex ideas in vivid, accessible prose and inexpensive formats, Rights of Man circulated widely among artisans, workers, and reformers, becoming a key text in late 18th‑century democratic and social‑reform movements. Scholars generally regard it as one of the foundational articulations of modern rights discourse and a major intervention in the transatlantic debates triggered by the American and French Revolutions.

2. Historical Context and Burke–Paine Controversy

Revolutionary Age

Rights of Man emerged amid the overlapping crises of the American Revolution (1775–1783) and the French Revolution (from 1789), when long‑standing assumptions about monarchy, sovereignty, and representation were widely debated. In Britain, demands for parliamentary reform, broader suffrage, and religious toleration intersected with fears of social upheaval.

Context	Relevance to Rights of Man
American Revolution	Provided Paine and others with a republican model and language of natural rights.
French Revolution	Sparked intense British debate over whether radical change abroad threatened domestic stability.
British political system	Dominated by a limited electorate, aristocratic influence, and an unwritten constitution celebrated by conservatives.

Burke’s Reflections and Its Reception

Edmund Burke’s Reflections on the Revolution in France (1790) criticized the French Revolution as a reckless destruction of inherited institutions. Burke defended monarchy, aristocracy, and the British constitution as products of historical continuity and “prejudice” in a positive sense—accumulated wisdom embodied in custom.

Supporters of Burke argued that rapid change based on abstract rights risked anarchy and tyranny. Critics, including many British and Irish reformers, regarded his position as an apology for corruption and exclusion.

Paine’s Intervention

Paine’s Rights of Man directly addresses Burke, challenging his interpretation of both the French events and the nature of political authority. The controversy is often summarized as a clash between:

Burke	Paine
Emphasis on tradition, inherited constitution, and mixed monarchy	Emphasis on natural rights, written constitutions, and popular sovereignty
Distrust of abstract theory; defense of “organic” change	Confidence in universal principles and deliberate institutional design

Later commentators sometimes treat this exchange as emblematic of broader tensions between conservatism and democratic radicalism in the 1790s.

3. Author and Composition

Thomas Paine’s Background

Thomas Paine (1737–1809) was an English‑born political writer who became prominent with Common Sense (1776), a widely read pamphlet advocating American independence. His experiences in Britain, America, and later revolutionary France shaped a transatlantic outlook attuned to questions of monarchy, representation, and rights.

Paine’s limited formal education but extensive practical experience—as corset maker, excise officer, and journalist—has led commentators to emphasize his ability to translate complex political theory into accessible language.

Circumstances of Composition

Rights of Man was composed between 1790 and 1792, largely in Britain, as Paine read and reacted to Burke’s Reflections. Part I was completed relatively quickly and published in March 1791; Part II followed in February 1792 after public debate had intensified.

Aspect	Part I	Part II
Main focus	Direct rebuttal of Burke; defense of French Revolution	General theory of government; practical reforms
Tone	Polemical, responsive	More systematic, programmatic

Paine dedicated Part I to George Washington, signaling a parallel between American and French revolutions. The composition process was shaped by evolving events in France, British government concern about radicalism, and Paine’s connections with reform societies. Some historians suggest that the increasing repression in Britain between the two parts pushed Paine to sharpen both his theoretical arguments and his proposals for domestic reform.

4. Structure and Organization of Rights of Man

Rights of Man is divided into two parts, each with a distinct, though related, purpose.

Part I: Answer to Burke

Part I, titled Rights of Man: Being an Answer to Mr. Burke’s Attack on the French Revolution, is structured primarily as a point‑by‑point engagement with Burke. Its organization includes:

An opening discussion distinguishing society from government.
Critical examination of hereditary monarchy and aristocracy.
Analysis of the French Revolution, the National Assembly, and the French constitution.
Comparison with the British constitution, questioning its coherence and legitimacy.
Reflections on the rights of the living generation versus the authority of the past.

The argumentative flow moves from immediate controversy to more general constitutional principles.

Part II: Combining Principle and Practice

Part II, Rights of Man: Combining Principle and Practice, is more systematic and programmatic:

Early chapters set out a theory of natural rights and the origin and end of government.
Subsequent sections develop the notion of popular sovereignty and written constitutions.
Paine then offers an extended critique of war, fiscal systems, and hereditary privilege.
The closing chapters present a detailed scheme of social welfare and tax reform.

Part	Primary Mode	Central Focus
I	Controversial / polemical	Defense of French Revolution; critique of Burke and British constitution
II	Theoretical and practical	General principles of government; concrete reform proposals

This organization enables the work to move from a particular debate to a broader statement of political philosophy and policy.

5. Central Arguments and Key Concepts

Natural Rights and Popular Sovereignty

Paine advances a robust theory of natural rights, holding that all humans possess rights prior to government, including liberty, security, and political participation. He maintains that sovereignty ultimately resides in the people, who alone can authorize and alter governments.

Proponents of this reading emphasize his insistence that:

“Every age and generation must be as free to act for itself…”

— Thomas Paine, Rights of Man, Part I

Critics argue that such a doctrine may understate the constraints imposed by existing institutions and social complexity.

Society vs. Government

Paine sharply differentiates society, arising from mutual benefit and cooperation, from government, a coercive apparatus designed to restrain vice. This distinction underpins his view that governments are mere agents of the people, not sovereign entities.

Hereditary Monarchy and Aristocracy

A central argument targets hereditary rule, which Paine describes as an illegitimate usurpation of collective authority. He contends that no family can have a natural right to govern and that inheritance of office is incompatible with equal rights. Supporters see this as a foundational critique of dynastic politics; opponents claim it neglects potential stabilizing functions of monarchical institutions.

Constitutions and the Right to Revolution

Paine insists on written constitutions crafted by a nation acting in its sovereign capacity. From this perspective, citizens retain a continuous right to alter or abolish any government that violates their rights. Some interpreters underline the radical implications for revolutionary legitimacy; others stress tensions between such a right and long‑term institutional continuity.

In Part II, Paine links rights to material conditions, advocating progressive taxation, public education, and welfare measures. Commentators often see this as an early articulation of social‑democratic ideas, while economic critics question its assumptions about state capacity and incentives.

6. Famous Passages and Political Impact

Notable Passages

Several passages in Rights of Man have become widely cited:

Critique of hereditary monarchy: Paine describes the hereditary principle as “an assumption of power” rooted in “ignorance and imposture,” arguing that birth confers no legitimate political authority.
Rights of the living: The declaration that each generation must be free to act for itself is frequently quoted as encapsulating his rejection of the binding force of ancestral compacts.
Society vs. government: The early contrast, portraying society as a blessing and government as a necessary evil, has been influential in later liberal and radical thought.
Social welfare program: The detailed proposals for pensions, child allowances, and education form a celebrated early statement of state‑supported social security.

Immediate Political Impact

Upon publication, Rights of Man sold in large numbers, including cheap editions accessible to artisans and laborers. It became a key text for British corresponding societies and reform associations.

Audience	Typical Response
Radical and reform movements	Embraced the work as a program for democratic and social reform.
British government	Regarded it as seditious; initiated prosecutions against Paine and his publishers.
Conservative commentators	Denounced it as incendiary and destabilizing.

The work’s language and arguments were deployed in campaigns for parliamentary reform, broader suffrage, and critiques of aristocratic privilege. Internationally, it contributed to debates in the United States and France about the scope of rights and the design of republican institutions, although reactions there varied with local political alignments.

7. Legacy and Historical Significance

Influence on Democratic Thought

Rights of Man is widely regarded as a cornerstone of modern democratic republicanism. Its articulation of natural rights, popular sovereignty, and representative government influenced 19th‑century reformers, chartist movements in Britain, and later democratic theorists. Some historians emphasize its role in popularizing the idea that legitimacy rests on consent and written constitutions, not on tradition alone.

Paine’s proposals for progressive taxation and public assistance are often seen as precursors to welfare‑state and social‑democratic policies. Supporters highlight the work’s attempt to reconcile property rights with social obligations; critics note that it precedes modern economic analysis and may rely on optimistic assumptions about state capacity.

Rights Discourse and Human Rights

Many scholars trace elements of contemporary human rights discourse to formulations in Rights of Man, particularly its universalizing language and emphasis on inalienable rights. Others caution that Paine’s focus is primarily on male citizens in Euro‑Atlantic contexts, and that the text does not systematically address women’s rights, colonial subjects, or enslaved people.

Historiographical Debates

Interpretations of the work vary:

Perspective	Emphasis
Liberal	Sees Paine as a key theorist of individual rights and constitutionalism.
Republican	Highlights civic virtue, opposition to corruption, and critique of oligarchic power.
Marxist and socialist	Values his attack on hereditary privilege and early social‑welfare ideas, but sometimes criticizes the retention of private property as central.
Postcolonial and feminist	Stresses androcentric and Eurocentric limits, while acknowledging the rhetorical power of his universal claims.

Overall, Rights of Man remains a central reference point in discussions of rights, revolution, and the foundations of political authority.

How to Cite This Entry

Use these citation formats to reference this work entry in your academic work. Click the copy button to copy the citation to your clipboard.

APA Style (7th Edition)

Philopedia. (2025). rights-of-man. Philopedia. https://philopedia.com/works/rights-of-man/

MLA Style (9th Edition)

"rights-of-man." Philopedia, 2025, https://philopedia.com/works/rights-of-man/.

Chicago Style (17th Edition)

Philopedia. "rights-of-man." Philopedia. Accessed December 11, 2025. https://philopedia.com/works/rights-of-man/.

BibTeX

@online{philopedia_rights_of_man,
  title = {rights-of-man},
  author = {Philopedia},
  year = {2025},
  url = {https://philopedia.com/works/rights-of-man/},
  urldate = {December 11, 2025}
}