Systematic Theology
Paul Tillich’s three-volume Systematic Theology is a comprehensive Protestant theological system that correlates the Christian message with the existential questions of modern culture. Combining elements of German Idealism, existentialism, phenomenology, and depth psychology, Tillich develops a method of correlation linking human anxiety, estrangement, and meaninglessness to doctrines of God, Christ, Spirit, and the Church. He redefines God as the “ground of being” or “being-itself,” reinterprets traditional dogmas—such as creation, fall, sin, and salvation—in symbolic and ontological terms, and offers a nuanced account of religious symbols, faith, and ultimate concern. The work is organized around a formal ontology and theory of knowledge (Vol. 1), an exploration of human existence and Christology (Vol. 2), and an exposition of the work of the Spirit, Church, history, and eschatology (Vol. 3).
At a Glance
- Author
- Paul Tillich
- Composed
- c. 1946–1963
- Language
- English (with extensive use of German technical vocabulary)
- Status
- original survives
- •The Method of Correlation: Tillich argues that systematic theology must correlate the existential questions arising from human existence (e.g., anxiety, guilt, meaninglessness) with the theological answers offered in Christian revelation. Instead of imposing doctrine abstractly, theology interprets the symbols of faith as responses to the deepest structures and questions of human life, maintaining a dynamic dialogue between culture and revelation.
- •God as the Ground of Being: Rejecting both classical theism’s portrayal of God as a supreme being among beings and modern atheism’s rejection of such a deity, Tillich contends that God is “being-itself” or the “ground of being.” God is not an entity within the universe but the unconditional depth and power of being that makes all finite existence possible. Therefore, theistic and atheistic denials of a highest being miss the true ontological meaning of the divine.
- •Faith as Ultimate Concern and the Nature of Symbols: Tillich defines faith as the state of being ultimately concerned, involving total commitment of the person to what is taken as ultimately meaningful. Religious language is inherently symbolic—it participates in, rather than merely points to, the reality to which it refers. Doctrinal statements about God, Christ, and salvation are symbolic expressions of ultimate concern and must not be literalized without distortion or dismissed as mere myth.
- •Existential Estrangement, Sin, and Salvation: Human existence is characterized by estrangement—from self, others, and the ground of being—articulated in the Christian symbols of sin and fall. This estrangement is not merely moral failure but an ontological condition of finitude, anxiety, and ambiguity. Salvation, expressed in Christ and the work of the Spirit, is reunion with the ground of being, acceptance of acceptance, and the healing of existential alienation.
- •The Kingdom of God, Church, and History: Tillich argues that the Church is the community that bears the Spiritual Presence within history, manifesting the New Being given in Christ. The Kingdom of God is not a temporal political regime but the eschatological fulfillment of history’s meaning. History is driven by ambiguity—mixtures of creativity and destruction, justice and injustice—but within this ambiguity, the Spiritual Presence works toward ultimate reunion and fulfillment that transcends history’s finite forms.
Systematic Theology established Tillich as a central figure in 20th-century Protestant theology and a key architect of the "theology of culture." The work influenced generations of theologians, philosophers of religion, and religious studies scholars by modeling a serious dialogue between Christian doctrine and contemporary philosophy, psychology, and the arts. Its concepts of God as the ground of being, faith as ultimate concern, the method of correlation, and the reinterpretation of dogma in existential-ontological terms have had lasting effects on liberal and post-liberal theology, political and liberation theologies, and the broader discourse on secularization and religious symbolism. The work also provoked important debates about the nature of theological language, the status of metaphysics in theology, and the relationship between confessional commitments and philosophical inquiry.
1. Introduction
Paul Tillich’s Systematic Theology is a three‑volume Protestant theological treatise that seeks to restate Christian doctrine in critical conversation with modern philosophy, science, and culture. Written in mid‑20th‑century North Atlantic contexts, it proposes a comprehensive “system” that moves from questions about knowledge and being, through an analysis of human existence, to an account of Spirit, Church, and eschatology.
Tillich’s work is distinctive for its effort to correlate classical Christian symbols with the “existential questions” posed by contemporary life—anxiety, doubt, meaninglessness, and social fragmentation. Rather than abandoning traditional dogmas, he reinterprets them in an ontological and symbolic key, introducing influential notions such as God as the “ground of being”, faith as “ultimate concern,” and Christ as “New Being.”
The treatise has been read both as a major contribution to liberal Protestant thought and as a bold experiment in philosophical theology that engages German Idealism, existentialism, phenomenology, and depth psychology. It has provoked sustained debate across confessional lines about the nature of God, revelation, and religious language, and continues to function as a touchstone for discussions of how theology might address a secular or “post‑Christian” world.
2. Historical and Intellectual Context
Tillich’s Systematic Theology emerges from the upheavals of the early to mid‑20th century: two world wars, the rise and defeat of fascism, and accelerating secularization in Europe and North America. His project is shaped by both German and American intellectual worlds.
Major Contextual Currents
| Context | Influence on Systematic Theology |
|---|---|
| German Idealism (Kant, Schelling, Hegel) | Provides categories of reason, spirit, and history; underlies Tillich’s ontological approach and his interest in mediation between finite and infinite. |
| Existential philosophy (Kierkegaard, Heidegger, Sartre) | Informs analyses of anxiety, finitude, and estrangement; contributes to his focus on individual existence and decision. |
| Neo‑orthodoxy (especially Karl Barth) | Shares a reaction against liberal optimism, but Tillich diverges by giving greater place to philosophy, culture, and natural theology. |
| Liberal theology and the “theology of culture” | Tillich’s earlier work on religion and culture feeds into his conviction that theology must interpret cultural symbols and not retreat into ecclesial isolation. |
| Depth psychology (Freud, Jung) | Shapes his understanding of the unconscious, symbol, and myth, and his attention to the dynamics of guilt and acceptance. |
| American pragmatism and pluralism | His U.S. teaching context encourages accessibility and engagement with science, democracy, and religious diversity. |
The work also stands against the background of long‑standing debates over metaphysics in theology. While some 20th‑century theologians sought to minimize metaphysical claims, Tillich reintroduces a robust ontology, arguing that questions of God and salvation are inseparable from questions of being and non‑being.
3. Author and Composition
Paul Tillich (1886–1965) was a German‑American Protestant theologian and philosopher. Ordained in the Prussian Union Church, he taught in several German universities before being dismissed by the Nazi regime in 1933 due to his socialist sympathies and opposition to National Socialism. He then emigrated to the United States, teaching at Union Theological Seminary, Columbia University, and later Harvard and the University of Chicago.
Composition History
| Aspect | Description |
|---|---|
| Genesis in lectures | Large portions of Systematic Theology grew out of courses and seminars Tillich offered from the mid‑1930s onward, especially at Union Theological Seminary. |
| Publication schedule | Volume 1 appeared in 1951, Volume 2 in 1957, and Volume 3 in 1963, all through the University of Chicago Press. |
| Language and style | Although written in English, the work preserves many German technical terms and patterns of argument, reflecting Tillich’s intellectual formation. |
| Development across volumes | Scholars note that each volume incorporates revisions prompted by earlier reception; for instance, later sections clarify and occasionally adjust formulations of the method of correlation and the doctrine of God. |
Commentators sometimes distinguish between Tillich’s “European” phase and his “American” phase; Systematic Theology belongs predominantly to the latter, marked by his engagement with a broader, more religiously diverse audience and by attempts to render dense Continental ideas intelligible in a North American setting.
4. Structure and Organization of the Three Volumes
Tillich organizes Systematic Theology as a tightly ordered system, combining a formal sequence (method → ontology → existence → Spirit → history) with traditional doctrinal loci.
Overview of Volumes
| Volume | Main Parts | Thematic Focus |
|---|---|---|
| Vol. 1: Reason and Revelation; Being and God | Part I: Reason and Revelation; Part II: Being and God | Lays methodological groundwork (method of correlation, reason, revelation, faith, symbol) and develops a formal ontology culminating in a doctrine of God as being‑itself and the divine life. |
| Vol. 2: Existence and the Christ | Part III: Existence and the Fall; Part IV: Existence and the Christ | Analyzes human existence (estrangement, sin, anxiety, ambiguities of life and history) and presents Christology: Jesus as the Christ, the New Being, and the meaning of atonement and justification. |
| Vol. 3: Life and the Spirit; History and the Kingdom of God | Part V: Life and the Divine Spirit; Part VI: History and the Kingdom of God | Treats the work of the Spirit in personal and communal life (including Church and sacraments) and offers a theology of history and eschatology (Kingdom of God, judgment, eternal life). |
Internal Ordering
Within each part, Tillich proceeds in a relatively consistent pattern:
- Formal analysis of the human or ontological situation (e.g., structures of reason, being, existence, life, history).
- Correlated exposition of Christian symbols that address that situation (e.g., God, Christ, Spirit, Church, Kingdom).
This pattern is meant to display systematic coherence: later doctrines presuppose earlier ontological and methodological clarifications, while also elaborating new dimensions of the same basic correlation between human questions and theological answers.
5. Central Arguments and Philosophical Method
Tillich’s Systematic Theology is unified by a distinctive approach to method and a set of interlocking theses about God, humanity, and history.
The Method of Correlation
Tillich’s most famous methodological claim is that theology should correlate existential questions and revelatory answers. He describes this in Volume 1 as a “circle” in which human self‑understanding and Christian message mutually illuminate each other:
“The method of correlation explains the contents of the Christian faith through existential questions and theological answers in mutual interdependence.”
— Paul Tillich, Systematic Theology, Vol. 1
Proponents see this as enabling serious engagement with philosophy, science, and culture. Critics argue it risks allowing contemporary questions to set the agenda for theology, or to relativize revelation.
Ontology and God
Tillich develops a formal ontology that distinguishes essence and existence, dynamics and form, freedom and destiny. Within this framework he argues that God is being‑itself or the ground of being, not one being among others. Supporters claim this avoids treating God as a finite object; detractors contend it threatens divine personality or blurs the line between God and world.
Faith, Symbol, and Revelation
Faith is defined as ultimate concern, engaging the whole person. Theological language is symbolic: it participates in the reality it expresses without being literally descriptive. Revelation, in this view, is the manifestation of the ground of being within the finite, culminating (for Tillich) in Jesus as the Christ. Discussion continues over whether this symbolic–ontological approach safeguards or weakens concrete doctrinal claims.
Estrangement, New Being, and History
Human existence is characterized by estrangement from self, others, and God. Christ as New Being overcomes this estrangement, and the Spiritual Presence works through history toward the Kingdom of God. Interpreters debate how far this narrative can be harmonized with traditional doctrines of sin, atonement, and eschatological judgment.
6. Key Concepts, Famous Passages, and Legacy
Key Concepts
| Concept | Brief Explanation |
|---|---|
| Method of Correlation | Theology correlates existential questions (anxiety, guilt, meaninglessness) with theological answers (revelation, salvation), maintaining dialogue between culture and doctrine. |
| Ground of Being (Being‑Itself) | God is not a highest being but the depth and power of being that makes all finite existence possible. |
| Ultimate Concern | Faith is the person’s total orientation toward what is taken as unconditionally important; idolatry occurs when finite realities claim ultimate status. |
| New Being | The reality manifested in Jesus as the Christ that heals estrangement and reconciles humanity with the ground of being. |
| Spiritual Presence | The activity of the Holy Spirit as the power of the New Being within persons, communities, and history. |
Famous Passages
Commentators frequently cite Volume 1’s treatment of God as being‑itself:
“God is the ground of being, not a being. To argue that God exists is to deny Him.”
— Paul Tillich, Systematic Theology, Vol. 1 (paraphrased summary)
Similarly, discussions of faith turn repeatedly to his definition of faith as ultimate concern and to his analysis of the “courage to be” and existential anxiety in Volume 2.
Legacy and Influence
Tillich’s system has exerted significant influence on:
- Liberal and post‑liberal Protestant theology, through its engagement with culture and its symbolic reading of doctrine.
- Philosophy of religion, especially debates about the meaning of “God” and religious language.
- Political, liberation, and feminist theologies, which sometimes appropriate his categories of estrangement and history while criticizing the cultural limits of his method of correlation.
- Religious studies and theology of culture, where his analyses of symbol, myth, and ultimate concern remain widely used.
Simultaneously, his work has been sharply contested by confessional theologians, analytic philosophers of religion, and some existential and post‑structural thinkers, ensuring its continued role as a major—often provocative—reference point in modern Christian thought.
How to Cite This Entry
Use these citation formats to reference this work entry in your academic work. Click the copy button to copy the citation to your clipboard.
Philopedia. (2025). systematic-theology. Philopedia. https://philopedia.com/works/systematic-theology/
"systematic-theology." Philopedia, 2025, https://philopedia.com/works/systematic-theology/.
Philopedia. "systematic-theology." Philopedia. Accessed December 10, 2025. https://philopedia.com/works/systematic-theology/.
@online{philopedia_systematic_theology,
title = {systematic-theology},
author = {Philopedia},
year = {2025},
url = {https://philopedia.com/works/systematic-theology/},
urldate = {December 10, 2025}
}