The Age of Reason: Being an Investigation of True and Fabulous Theology
The Age of Reason is Thomas Paine’s deist critique of revealed religion, especially Christianity and the authority of the Bible. Arguing that reason and observation of nature are the only sound foundations for belief in God, Paine rejects miracles, revelation, the divinity of Jesus, and ecclesiastical authority as superstitious or corrupt. Part I presents his positive deism and general attack on revelation; Part II and the subsequent prophetic examination undertake detailed, often caustic, textual analysis of the Old and New Testaments to show internal contradictions, moral absurdities, and historical unreliability. The work aims to free religion from what Paine sees as priestcraft and to ground morality in natural religion accessible to all human beings.
At a Glance
- Author
- Thomas Paine
- Composed
- Part I: 1793–1794; Part II: 1795; Part III (often called An Examination of the Prophecies): c. 1806–1807
- Language
- English
- Status
- copies only
- •True religion is deism: belief in one God known through reason and the study of nature, not through churches, priests, or revealed scriptures.
- •Revealed religion is epistemically invalid: a revelation may be a revelation to the first person who receives it, but for anyone else it is only hearsay and cannot bind belief.
- •The Bible is a human, historically contingent compilation, full of contradictions, immoral stories, and errors, and therefore cannot serve as an infallible word of God.
- •Miracles are incredible violations of the regular order of nature and are less believable than the likelihood that reports about them are false, mistaken, or fabricated.
- •Organized churches, especially Christian churches, have historically corrupted religion for power and profit, using fear, mystery, and dogma to dominate civil society.
The Age of Reason is one of the most influential deist works in the Anglo‑American world and a landmark in modern religious criticism. It popularized Enlightenment skepticism about miracles and revelation for a broad, non‑academic audience, linking religious critique with democratic and anti‑authoritarian politics. The text contributed to the development of biblical higher criticism by treating scripture as a historically produced, fallible collection of texts. It also played a major role in shaping nineteenth‑century freethought, secularism, and later critiques of organized religion, even as it helped to define the boundaries of permissible religious dissent in emerging liberal societies.
1. Introduction
The Age of Reason: Being an Investigation of True and Fabulous Theology is a late‑eighteenth‑century religious treatise in which Thomas Paine articulates a popular form of deism and subjects biblical Christianity to sustained critique. Written in plain, polemical English rather than in academic prose, it addresses what Paine calls the “citizens of the world,” positioning itself as a work of religious and intellectual emancipation.
At its core, the book contrasts natural religion, grounded in human reason and the observable order of nature, with revealed religion, grounded in alleged supernatural communication and scriptural authority. Paine affirms belief in a single, benevolent Creator but rejects miracles, mysteries, priestly mediation, and the infallibility of sacred texts.
A central methodological claim is that reports of revelation are, for everyone except the original recipient, merely hearsay and therefore cannot command rational assent. On this basis, Paine treats the Bible and other scriptures as human literature open to historical, moral, and logical scrutiny.
The work is commonly read as a bridge between Enlightenment religious skepticism and later freethought and secular critique of organized religion. It has been praised as a lucid statement of popular deism and condemned as a reductive attack on Christian doctrine. Subsequent sections examine the specific historical circumstances, arguments, and reception that have shaped its place in intellectual history.
2. Historical Context
2.1 Enlightenment and Revolutionary Milieu
The Age of Reason emerged from the Enlightenment, when European and American thinkers elevated reason, empirical inquiry, and critique of tradition. Paine’s arguments draw on earlier deist writers but adapt their ideas to a broad, politically engaged audience amid the American and French Revolutions.
| Context | Relevance to The Age of Reason |
|---|---|
| Enlightenment deism | Provided the conceptual framework of a rational Creator and skepticism about miracles and revelation. |
| Scientific revolution | Encouraged viewing nature as governed by consistent laws, against which miracles could be measured critically. |
| Radical print culture | Enabled cheap pamphlet circulation, making religious critique accessible beyond elites. |
2.2 Political Upheaval and Religious Controversy
The text was composed largely during the French Revolution, including Paine’s imprisonment during the Terror. Many historians argue that anti‑clerical sentiment in revolutionary France, where church power was closely linked to the ancien régime, informed Paine’s attacks on priestly authority. Others stress continuities with Anglo‑American dissenting traditions and earlier struggles for religious toleration.
In Britain, the work appeared under stringent blasphemy laws, and prosecutions of printers and booksellers reflected elite anxiety about the spread of irreligion among artisans and workers. In the United States, debates over republican virtue and church–state separation framed reactions to Paine: some saw deist critique as compatible with liberty; others viewed it as a threat to social order.
Scholars differ on whether the book should be read primarily as a product of political radicalism, religious controversy, or broader intellectual change; most accounts treat it as situated at the intersection of all three.
3. Author and Composition
3.1 Thomas Paine’s Intellectual Trajectory
Thomas Paine (1737–1809) was a political writer best known for Common Sense and Rights of Man. Raised in an English environment of mixed Anglican and dissenting influences, he was exposed to both scriptural piety and emerging freethought. Biographers generally agree that Paine embraced deism before the 1790s, though they disagree on how systematically he had developed his views prior to The Age of Reason.
His political activism in America and France sharpened his hostility to institutions he regarded as oppressive, including established churches. Some scholars see his religious critique as an extension of his democratic politics; others contend that his religious skepticism was independently grounded in earlier reading and reflection.
3.2 Circumstances of Writing and Publication
Part I was drafted in 1793–1794 while Paine was imprisoned during the French Revolution and believed he might soon be executed. He later described writing it partly as a last testament of his religious views. The text appeared anonymously in London in 1794, dated 1793, to navigate legal and political risks.
Part II, written after his release and published in 1795, responds to early critics and elaborates detailed biblical analysis. A later work on prophecy (often styled Part III) dates from c. 1806–1807 and was published in 1807 in America.
| Part | Approx. Composition | First Publication | Notable Features |
|---|---|---|---|
| I | 1793–1794 (in prison) | 1794 (London) | Statement of creed and general critique of revelation. |
| II | 1795 | 1795 | Extended textual critique of Old and New Testaments. |
| III* | c. 1806–1807 | 1807 (US) | Focused analysis of alleged messianic prophecies. |
*Often printed separately or as an associated work.
Scholars debate how far the haste and stress of composition affected Paine’s accuracy and tone; sympathetic interpreters emphasize the constraints of imprisonment, while critics highlight factual errors they attribute to this compressed process.
4. Structure and Organization of The Age of Reason
The Age of Reason is typically presented in two principal parts, with a related third text on prophecy. Its organization moves from broad methodological claims to detailed textual examination.
4.1 Overview of the Parts
| Part | Main Focus | Dominant Methods |
|---|---|---|
| Part I | Positive statement of deist belief; general critique of revelation, miracles, and priestcraft. | Philosophical argument, appeals to common sense, rhetorical polemic. |
| Part II | Systematic scrutiny of Old and New Testament books. | Historical criticism, internal comparison of texts, moral evaluation. |
| Part III (associated) | Examination of Old Testament prophecies alleged to predict Jesus. | Close reading of Hebrew Bible passages, contextual reinterpretation. |
4.2 Internal Arrangement
Within Part I, Paine begins with his personal creed, then develops key distinctions between natural and revealed religion, and proceeds to arguments against revelation, miracles, and ecclesiastical authority. The sequence is generally linear: from principles to consequences for specific doctrines.
Part II is organized roughly along the canonical order of biblical books. Paine introduces general doubts about authorship and compilation, then offers chapter‑by‑chapter or book‑by‑book comments. He alternates between:
- Claims about authorship and dating (e.g., Mosaic authorship of the Pentateuch),
- Observations on contradictions and inconsistencies, and
- Critiques of moral content.
In treating the New Testament, he follows the Gospels and major epistles, comparing parallel narratives (e.g., different resurrection accounts).
The prophecy text (often “Part III”) is structured as a catalogue of passages traditionally regarded as messianic, each followed by Paine’s alternative, non‑Christological interpretation, emphasizing original historical context.
5. Central Arguments and Key Concepts
5.1 Natural Religion and Deism
Paine’s starting point is a succinct deist creed:
“I believe in one God, and no more; and I hope for happiness beyond this life.”
— Thomas Paine, The Age of Reason, Part I
He maintains that the existence and attributes of God are knowable through reason and the order of nature, not through sacred texts. Nature itself is described as the “Word of God,” universally accessible and self‑evident, in contrast to particular, disputed scriptures.
5.2 Critique of Revelation and Miracles
A central argument concerns the epistemic status of revelation. Paine contends that any direct communication from God can be certain only for the original recipient:
“It is revelation to the first person only, and hearsay to every other.”
— Thomas Paine, The Age of Reason, Part I
On this basis, he questions the authority of all revealed religions. Reports of miracles are treated as claims that contravene the uniformity of nature; Paine argues it is always more plausible that testimony is mistaken, deceptive, or misunderstood than that natural order has been suspended.
5.3 Scriptural Criticism and Priestcraft
Paine’s textual analysis leads him to regard the Bible as a human compilation, marked by contradictions, redactions, and morally troubling episodes. He denies its status as an infallible divine word and challenges doctrines such as the Trinity and the divinity of Jesus as philosophical or scriptural misreadings.
The concept of priestcraft encapsulates his sociological critique: organized churches are portrayed as institutions that exploit fear of the supernatural to secure power and wealth. He contrasts this with a religion of conscience, in which morality derives from human sympathy and the perceived justice of God, rather than from ecclesiastical command.
Subsequent interpreters disagree on the philosophical rigor of these arguments, but they generally agree that the work helped popularize a cluster of key concepts—deism, natural religion, hearsay revelation, and priestcraft—that became central to later religious criticism.
6. Legacy and Historical Significance
6.1 Immediate Impact and Controversy
Upon publication, The Age of Reason provoked intense reactions. In Britain, it circulated widely among radicals, contributing to prosecutions for blasphemy. In the United States, it significantly damaged Paine’s reputation among many former admirers, even as it galvanized a minority of freethinkers and deists.
| Sphere | Typical Reaction | Illustrative Consequences |
|---|---|---|
| Established churches | Denounced Paine as atheist; published numerous refutations. | Sermons and pamphlets attacking deism; reinforcement of doctrinal boundaries. |
| Radical and working‑class circles | Used as a tool of anti‑clerical and political critique. | Secret readings, cheap reprints, legal trials of printers. |
| Early American republic | Mixed: some valued religious liberty, others feared moral decline. | Contribution to debates over church–state separation and civic virtue. |
6.2 Long‑Term Intellectual Influence
Historians often regard the text as a landmark in popularizing Enlightenment religious skepticism. It is cited as an accessible precursor to more scholarly biblical higher criticism, because it treats scripture as a historically contingent set of documents open to philological and historical inquiry.
In the nineteenth century, The Age of Reason became a canonical text for secularist, rationalist, and freethought movements in Britain, America, and beyond. Critics argue that Paine oversimplified theological positions and underestimated the diversity of religious traditions, but even these assessments typically acknowledge the work’s role in defining the terms of modern debates about revelation, miracle, and church authority.
Current scholarship situates the book at the intersection of political radicalism and religious critique, viewing it as significant not only for the history of theology but also for the history of democratic culture, freedom of expression, and the social boundaries of permissible dissent.
How to Cite This Entry
Use these citation formats to reference this work entry in your academic work. Click the copy button to copy the citation to your clipboard.
Philopedia. (2025). the-age-of-reason-being-an-investigation-of-true-and-fabulous-theology. Philopedia. https://philopedia.com/works/the-age-of-reason-being-an-investigation-of-true-and-fabulous-theology/
"the-age-of-reason-being-an-investigation-of-true-and-fabulous-theology." Philopedia, 2025, https://philopedia.com/works/the-age-of-reason-being-an-investigation-of-true-and-fabulous-theology/.
Philopedia. "the-age-of-reason-being-an-investigation-of-true-and-fabulous-theology." Philopedia. Accessed December 11, 2025. https://philopedia.com/works/the-age-of-reason-being-an-investigation-of-true-and-fabulous-theology/.
@online{philopedia_the_age_of_reason_being_an_investigation_of_true_and_fabulous_theology,
title = {the-age-of-reason-being-an-investigation-of-true-and-fabulous-theology},
author = {Philopedia},
year = {2025},
url = {https://philopedia.com/works/the-age-of-reason-being-an-investigation-of-true-and-fabulous-theology/},
urldate = {December 11, 2025}
}