The Essays
Les Essais is a three-book collection of highly personal, digressive prose reflections in which Montaigne examines himself, human nature, and the instability of knowledge. Drawing on classical sources, anecdotes, and his own experience, he experiments with a new literary form—the essay—as a vehicle for philosophical skepticism, moral reflection, and self-portraiture. Rather than offering a systematic doctrine, Montaigne rehearses and tests opinions on topics such as education, friendship, custom, death, religious conflict, and the limits of human reason, famously adopting the motto “Que sais-je?” (“What do I know?”). The work’s unity lies less in argument than in method: a self-reflective, provisional, and exploratory inquiry that treats his own life as an example of the human condition.
At a Glance
- Author
- Michel de Montaigne
- Composed
- c. 1570–1592
- Language
- French (Renaissance French)
- Status
- copies only
- •Epistemic Skepticism and ‘Que sais-je?’: Human reason is weak, unstable, and shaped by custom, so we should suspend dogmatic judgment, cultivate modesty about what we can know, and recognize that our beliefs rest on fragile, historically contingent foundations.
- •The Power of Custom and Relativism of Morals: Customs and laws—often arbitrary and contradictory—shape our deepest convictions; recognizing their relativity should foster tolerance, reduce cruelty, and weaken ethnocentric judgments, especially toward so‑called ‘barbarous’ peoples.
- •Philosophy as Learning to Die: Constant meditation on mortality and the finitude of life frees us from the fear of death and allows us to live more lucidly; death is a natural event, and the art of living well is inseparable from the art of dying well.
- •Self-Knowledge and the Essay as Self-Portrait: By openly displaying his own inconsistencies, weaknesses, and shifting moods, Montaigne argues that philosophical insight arises from candid self-scrutiny; the essay becomes a literary form for experimenting with one’s own judgment and for presenting a living, changing self.
- •Moderation, Tolerance, and Anti-Fanaticism: In an age of religious wars, Montaigne defends moderation, civility, and skepticism toward ideological absolutes, arguing that zealotry and certainty are more dangerous than error; political and religious peace depend on restraining cruelty and accepting human fallibility.
Les Essais helped invent the modern essay as a literary genre and pioneered a first-person, introspective style that shaped European literature, moral philosophy, and early modern skepticism. Montaigne’s reflections influenced thinkers such as Pascal, Descartes (in part negatively, as something to react against), Bacon, and later Enlightenment figures including Voltaire, Rousseau, and Hume. His method of self-examination, attention to cultural difference, and critique of cruelty anticipate later liberal and humanist commitments, as well as modern anthropology and psychology. The Essays became a cornerstone of French prose and a classic of world literature, continually reinterpreted in debates about skepticism, relativism, subjectivity, and the nature of literary self-portraiture.
1. Introduction
Montaigne’s Essays (Les Essais) is a three‑book collection of prose reflections in which a sixteenth‑century French magistrate turns his own life, body, and judgments into material for philosophical inquiry. Rather than constructing a system, Montaigne “tries out” ideas—hence essai, “trial” or “attempt”—on topics that range from death, education, and friendship to religious conflict, cultural difference, and everyday habits.
The work is often seen as inaugurating the modern essay as a genre and a new, introspective mode of writing about the self. Montaigne’s famously tentative motto, “Que sais‑je?” (“What do I know?”), signals both his skepticism about secure knowledge and his commitment to exploring uncertainty rather than resolving it.
Readers and scholars have interpreted the Essays in multiple ways: as a key text of Renaissance humanism; as a vehicle for Pyrrhonian skepticism; as a moral handbook aimed at moderation amid civil war; and as an early experiment in literary self‑portraiture. These different perspectives converge on the view that Montaigne uses his own singular case to illuminate the variability and fragility of the human condition.
The Essays thus occupies an unusual position: simultaneously a classic of French literature, a central document of early modern philosophy, and a pioneering exploration of subjectivity that continues to inform discussions of skepticism, tolerance, and the limits of self‑knowledge.
2. Historical Context and Intellectual Background
2.1 France in the Wars of Religion
Montaigne wrote during the French Wars of Religion (1562–1598), a period of violent conflict between Catholics and Huguenots. Massacres such as the Saint Bartholomew’s Day killings (1572) and shifting political alliances shaped his concerns with civil strife, fanaticism, and the need for moderation.
| Year | Event (selected, contextual) |
|---|---|
| 1562 | Outbreak of French Wars of Religion |
| 1572 | Saint Bartholomew’s Day Massacre |
| 1580 | First edition of Essays |
| 1598 | Edict of Nantes (relative pacification) |
As a former magistrate and occasional envoy, Montaigne observed how doctrinal certainty could fuel cruelty. Many interpreters link his advocacy of tolerance and anti‑zealotry directly to this political and religious upheaval.
2.2 Humanism and Classical Learning
Educated in Latin from childhood, Montaigne was steeped in Renaissance humanism. He cites authors such as Seneca, Plutarch, Cicero, and Lucretius, not as authorities to be followed slavishly but as interlocutors to be tested.
Humanism provided:
| Humanist Feature | Reflection in the Essays |
|---|---|
| Revival of classical texts | Constant quotation, adaptation, and critique of ancient authors |
| Emphasis on eloquence | Conversational, stylistically varied French prose |
| Moral formation of the self | Focus on character, judgment, and everyday conduct |
2.3 Skepticism and Theology
The reappearance of Pyrrhonian texts, especially Sextus Empiricus (via Latin and humanist intermediaries), offered Montaigne a repertoire of skeptical arguments. These are most fully deployed in the “Apologie de Raymond Sebond,” where he questions human pretensions to knowledge.
At the same time, Montaigne remained within a broadly Catholic framework, participating in church life and invoking divine providence. Scholars disagree whether his skepticism primarily served:
- A fideist strategy (undermining reason to make room for faith),
- A generalized suspension of judgment, or
- A cautious, pragmatic stance within confessional conflict.
3. Author and Composition of the Essays
3.1 Montaigne’s Life and Career
Michel de Montaigne (1533–1592) was a minor nobleman in southwest France, trained in law and serving as a magistrate in the Bordeaux parlement. His close friendship with Étienne de La Boétie, who died in 1563, deeply marked him and later shaped the famous essay “Of Friendship.”
In 1571, Montaigne retired to his family estate and tower library, where he began composing the Essays. He nonetheless returned intermittently to public roles, including serving as mayor of Bordeaux (1581–1585), experiences that fed into his reflections on politics and judgment.
3.2 Stages of Composition and Revision
The Essays grew through successive waves of writing and revision:
| Stage | Approx. Date | Features |
|---|---|---|
| Initial composition | c. 1570–1580 | Drafting of what became Books I–II |
| First edition (Bordeaux) | 1580 | 57 essays in two books |
| Second edition (Paris) | 1588 | Addition of Book III; revisions and expansions |
| Bordeaux Copy revisions | c. 1588–1592 | Handwritten marginal additions by Montaigne |
| Posthumous edition | 1595 | Prepared by Marie de Gournay, based on Bordeaux Copy |
Montaigne treated his book as a living document. Later additions often comment on, correct, or undercut earlier formulations, making the text stratified and historically layered.
3.3 Editorial Mediation
The Bordeaux Copy (Exemplaire de Bordeaux) is central for modern editors; it contains Montaigne’s autograph corrections to the 1588 printing. The 1595 edition, overseen by his “adoptive daughter” Marie de Gournay, disseminated a text already shaped by her and later printers.
Scholars debate the extent to which the available versions reflect Montaigne’s final intentions, leading to differences between modern critical editions and translations regarding variants and ordering.
4. Structure, Themes, and Philosophical Method
4.1 Overall Organization
The Essays comprises three books, subdivided into chapters whose titles often only loosely match their contents. Rather than a linear treatise, the work presents a constellation of reflections, with recurring motifs and cross‑references.
| Book | General Characterization |
|---|---|
| I | Early reflections on human nature, custom, death, war |
| II | Expanded skepticism, politics, imagination, presumption |
| III | Late, highly personal essays on self, body, experience |
The order of essays appears only partially thematic; many readers see the arrangement as deliberately unsystematic, mirroring the contingencies of thought.
4.2 Recurrent Themes
Although unsystematic, the Essays repeatedly return to:
- Skepticism and fallibility: limits of reason, instability of belief.
- Custom (coutume): the power and arbitrariness of social norms.
- Death and mortality: learning to live by meditating on dying.
- Self‑knowledge: the self as changing, conflicted, and opaque.
- Moderation and tolerance: resistance to cruelty and fanaticism.
- Embodiment: emphasis on illness, pleasure, and physical habits.
These themes are not treated as discrete topics but woven into anecdotes, classical citations, and autobiographical scenes.
4.3 The Essay as Philosophical Method
Montaigne’s method is experimental rather than demonstrative. An essai tests an idea by:
- Assembling examples from reading and experience,
- Trying out conflicting arguments,
- Reporting the writer’s shifting reactions.
Proponents of a skeptical reading see this method as enacting epoché (suspension of judgment). Others stress its pragmatic orientation: Montaigne aims at wise conduct under uncertainty, not theoretical certainty.
His self‑portraiture is likewise methodological. By exposing his own inconstancy, he invites readers to examine their judgments as contingent and revisable, making philosophical reflection an ongoing practice rather than a finished doctrine.
5. Key Arguments, Concepts, and Famous Passages
5.1 Central Arguments and Concepts
Several recurring arguments structure the Essays:
| Theme / Concept | Characterization in the Essays |
|---|---|
| “Que sais‑je?” | Motto encapsulating epistemic humility and anti‑dogmatism |
| Skepticism about reason | Human judgment portrayed as weak, passion‑ridden, custom‑bound |
| Custom and relativism | Laws and morals shown to vary widely, undermining claims of absolutes |
| Philosophy as learning to die | Death‑focused reflection as a way to liberate life from fear |
| Friendship | Rare, near‑perfect union of souls, exemplified by La Boétie |
| Moderation and anti‑fanaticism | Critique of zealotry, cruelty, and ideological certainty |
Interpretations differ on whether these elements form a coherent skeptical ethics or a looser set of observations.
5.2 Notable Essays and Passages
“Apologie de Raymond Sebond” (II, 12)
A long essay that begins as a defense of a Christian theologian but becomes a wide‑ranging attack on human arrogance. Montaigne juxtaposes animals’ abilities with human limitations to question human superiority.
“When I play with my cat, who knows whether she is not amusing herself with me more than I with her?”
— Montaigne, Essays II, 12
“Of Cannibals” (I, 31)
Discusses Brazilian peoples (e.g., Tupinambá) reported by travelers. Montaigne contrasts their practices with European cruelty, querying who is truly “barbarous.” Some readers see early cultural relativism; others emphasize his moral critique of Europe.
“That to Study Philosophy Is to Learn to Die” (I, 20)
Asserts that frequent meditation on death diminishes fear and sharpens one’s grasp of life’s value.
“Of Friendship” (I, 28)
Articulates an ideal of spiritual and intellectual friendship, famously describing his bond with La Boétie as grounded in an ineffable “because it was he, because it was I.”
“Of Experience” (III, 13)
The final essay stresses concrete experience over rules, advocating a flexible, embodied wisdom.
6. Legacy and Historical Significance
6.1 Influence on Philosophy and Literature
The Essays has exerted lasting influence across disciplines:
| Domain | Selected Figures and Uses |
|---|---|
| Philosophy | Descartes (as a skeptical foil), Pascal, Bacon, Hume, Nietzsche |
| Literature | Shakespeare (via Florio), Emerson, Virginia Woolf, Proust |
| Moral thought | Enlightenment moralists and later liberal, humanist traditions |
Some see Montaigne as a precursor to modern subjectivity, influencing confessional and introspective writing, while others emphasize his role in shaping early modern skepticism and empiricism.
6.2 The Essay Genre and Self‑Writing
Montaigne is widely credited with helping to invent the essay as a literary form, inspiring later essayists from Francis Bacon to contemporary writers. His blending of anecdote, reflection, and self‑analysis made the essay a vehicle for exploratory thought rather than mere didactic exposition.
In studies of autobiography and self‑writing, the Essays is frequently treated as an early form of self‑portraiture. Scholars debate whether Montaigne anticipates a stable, inner “self” or rather dramatizes its fragmentation and mutability.
6.3 Reception and Debates
The Roman Catholic Church placed the Essays on the Index of Prohibited Books, reflecting concerns about doctrinal ambiguity and moral relativism. Nonetheless, the work circulated widely and was reinterpreted in different contexts:
- As a Christian moralist emphasizing humility and charity,
- As a proto‑liberal advocate of toleration and individual judgment,
- As a radical skeptic undermining metaphysical and moral certainties.
Modern criticism has also raised questions about Montaigne’s social and gendered perspective, noting that his “universal” human often resembles his own privileged male status. Others highlight his attention to cultural difference and critique of cruelty as anticipating later anthropological and human rights concerns.
Through these varied receptions, the Essays has remained a central reference point in debates over skepticism, relativism, humanism, and the nature of the reflective self.
Study Guide
intermediateThe Essays mix accessible personal anecdotes with dense classical references and sophisticated skeptical arguments. Students with some prior exposure to early modern thought and basic philosophy can follow the main lines, but fully appreciating the historical, theological, and rhetorical nuances requires careful, guided reading.
Que sais-je? (‘What do I know?’)
Montaigne’s skeptical motto, expressing his conviction that human knowledge is limited, fallible, and often distorted by custom, imagination, and passion.
Essay (essai) as ‘trial’ or ‘attempt’
A short, exploratory piece of writing in which Montaigne experiments with ideas and self-observation instead of presenting polished, definitive arguments.
Skepticism (Pyrrhonism)
A stance of suspending judgment when faced with conflicting evidence or arguments, emphasizing the instability of sense perception, reason, and received authorities.
Custom (coutume)
The inherited social norms, habits, and laws that shape our beliefs and behaviors while often masquerading as natural or rational necessities.
Self-portrait (autoportrait)
Montaigne’s idea that the Essays constitute a literary portrait of his own changing mind, body, and character rather than an account of external events.
Moderation (mesure)
An ethical ideal of avoiding extremes in belief, emotion, and action, seeking a balanced life suited to one’s nature and circumstances.
Experience (expérience)
Concrete, lived engagement with the world—including bodily states and social interactions—which Montaigne often prefers as a guide over abstract theory.
Bordeaux Copy (Exemplaire de Bordeaux)
Montaigne’s personal, annotated copy of the 1588 edition of the Essays, containing extensive handwritten revisions and additions.
How does Montaigne’s definition of the ‘essay’ as a trial or attempt shape the way you should interpret his apparent contradictions and changes of mind across the three books?
In what ways does Montaigne’s motto ‘Que sais-je?’ both undermine and support practical decision-making in everyday life?
To what extent can Montaigne’s treatment of ‘Des cannibales’ be considered an early form of cultural relativism, and where do you see him retaining universal standards of judgment?
How does Montaigne balance admiration and criticism of Stoicism in developing his ethics of moderation?
In the Apologie de Raymond Sebond, does Montaigne’s attack on natural theology ultimately serve religious faith or undermine it?
What role does the body—illness, aging, physical habits—play in Montaigne’s conception of self-knowledge and the ‘human condition’?
In what sense can the Essays be said to contribute to the emergence of ‘modern subjectivity’ or a new way of thinking about the self?
How to Cite This Entry
Use these citation formats to reference this work entry in your academic work. Click the copy button to copy the citation to your clipboard.
Philopedia. (2025). the-essays. Philopedia. https://philopedia.com/works/the-essays/
"the-essays." Philopedia, 2025, https://philopedia.com/works/the-essays/.
Philopedia. "the-essays." Philopedia. Accessed December 11, 2025. https://philopedia.com/works/the-essays/.
@online{philopedia_the_essays,
title = {the-essays},
author = {Philopedia},
year = {2025},
url = {https://philopedia.com/works/the-essays/},
urldate = {December 11, 2025}
}