The Myth of Sisyphus

1. Introduction

Albert Camus’s The Myth of Sisyphus is a philosophical essay that addresses what it presents as the most urgent question of philosophy: whether life is worth living. It approaches this question through the notion of the absurd, defined as the conflict between the human need for meaning and a world that appears silent and indifferent.

Camus frames the essay as an inquiry conducted without recourse to religious consolation or metaphysical systems. He proposes to examine, in strictly immanent terms, what follows when one takes seriously the feeling that life has no ultimate justification. The work moves from the concrete experience of estrangement and the temptation of suicide to more abstract reflections on reason, faith, and value.

Rather than constructing a comprehensive system, the essay combines philosophical argument with literary imagery and examples drawn from everyday life, drama, and myth. It ultimately offers a picture of how one might live lucidly within an absurd condition, without denial or transcendence. The closing reinterpretation of the Greek figure Sisyphus functions as a symbolic condensation of this stance, but the argument is developed across multiple parts that explore suicide, “philosophical leaps,” exemplary ways of living, and the meaning of revolt.

2. Historical and Intellectual Context

2.1 Wartime and French Intellectual Life

The Myth of Sisyphus was published in 1942 in German‑occupied Paris. Its composition in 1940–41 coincided with the fall of France, the Vichy regime, and widespread disillusionment with traditional moral and political authorities. Commentators often link the essay’s preoccupation with death, limit, and meaninglessness to this broader climate of crisis.

In French intellectual life, the work appeared alongside early texts by Jean‑Paul Sartre, Simone de Beauvoir, and others who would later be grouped under “existentialism.” Camus, however, resisted that label, and many scholars emphasize significant differences between his thought and Sartrean existentialism, especially concerning freedom and history.

2.2 Philosophical Backgrounds

Camus’s argument engages, explicitly and implicitly, with several traditions:

2.3 Literary and Cultural Influences

The essay also reflects interwar literary currents—surrealism, modernist experimentation, and a fascination with absurdity on stage and in fiction. It is frequently read in conjunction with Camus’s novel The Stranger (1942), which many see as dramatizing, in narrative form, the philosophical concerns articulated in the essay.

3. Author and Composition

3.1 Camus’s Biographical Situation

Albert Camus (1913–1960), born in colonial Algeria to a working‑class family, wrote The Myth of Sisyphus while moving between Algiers, Oran, and Paris. His early experiences of poverty, tuberculosis, and the intense Algerian landscape are often cited as formative for his sensitivity to limit, physicality, and mortality. At the time of composition, he was a journalist and essayist rather than an established philosopher, associated with the newspaper Alger Républicain and later with resistance circles.

3.2 Genesis and Drafting

Scholars generally agree that Camus began sketching ideas about the absurd in notebooks in the mid‑1930s. These notes evolved into a projected “cycle of the absurd” comprising a novel (The Stranger), a philosophical essay (The Myth of Sisyphus), and theatrical works. Drafts were largely completed by 1941.

3.3 Relation to Other Works

Camus himself indicated that The Myth of Sisyphus should be read alongside The Stranger and later The Rebel. Commentators often treat the essay as the theoretical articulation of themes explored narratively in The Stranger and as the starting point for a later “cycle of revolt.” Debates persist over how continuous Camus’s views remain from this early essay to his later, more politically engaged writings.

4. Structure and Organization of the Essay

The essay is organized into an introduction and four main parts, sometimes followed by related notes on art in collected editions. Camus blends argumentative sections with portraits and a final mythological reinterpretation.

4.1 Internal Logic of the Parts

• Introduction and Part I move from everyday experiences (routine, sudden strangeness, awareness of death) to a conceptual definition of the absurd and assessment of physical suicide.
• Part II shifts to critical history of ideas, evaluating responses that acknowledge absurdity but then “leap” toward transcendent meaning.
• Part III is more descriptive and quasi‑literary, portraying three figures—Don Juan, the actor, the conqueror/creator—to illustrate what Camus calls the absurd man.
• Part IV returns to myth to encapsulate the preceding analysis in a single, symbolic narrative centered on Sisyphus’s eternal labor.

This progression has been interpreted as moving from problem statement, through negative critique, to a tentative positive ethic embodied in images rather than in a formal system.

5. Central Arguments and Key Concepts

5.1 The Problem of Suicide and the Absurd

Camus opens with the claim:

"

“There is but one truly serious philosophical problem, and that is suicide.”

— Albert Camus, The Myth of Sisyphus, Introduction

The essay argues that any philosophy must show whether life is worth living. From the confrontation between the human demand for meaning and a seemingly indifferent universe arises the absurd, which is described not as a property of the world or the self alone but as their relation.

5.2 Rejection of Suicide and the “Leap”

Two main evasions are analyzed:

Proponents of religious or metaphysical systems contend that such leaps answer the need for meaning; Camus’s text maintains that they introduce unjustified hope.

5.3 Revolt, Freedom, and the Absurd Man

In place of resignation, the essay outlines an attitude of revolt: a sustained, lucid refusal to accept either despair or transcendence. Within the absence of ultimate purpose, freedom is reinterpreted as the ability to shape one’s life qualitatively and quantitatively—through intensity of experience rather than final goals.

The absurd man embodies this stance. Figures such as Don Juan, the actor, and the conqueror/creator illustrate living fully “without appeal,” accepting finitude while maintaining passion, diversity of experience, and ongoing confrontation with the absurd.

6. Legacy and Historical Significance

6.1 Influence on Philosophy and Culture

The Myth of Sisyphus has become a central reference in discussions of absurdism, existentialism, and modern responses to nihilism. Its formulation of the absurd and its closing image—“One must imagine Sisyphus happy”—have been widely cited in philosophy, literature, and popular culture. The essay informed postwar debates about secular meaning, often read in tandem with Sartre’s works and later analytic treatments such as Thomas Nagel’s “The Absurd.”

In theatre and literature, it is frequently associated with the Theatre of the Absurd (e.g., Beckett, Ionesco), though scholars disagree on the extent of direct influence versus shared thematic concerns.

6.2 Reception and Critique

Contemporary and later responses have been diverse:

6.3 Place in Camus’s Oeuvre

The essay is widely regarded as the foundational statement of Camus’s “cycle of the absurd” and as a precursor to his later exploration of revolt in The Rebel. Some interpreters highlight continuity between these phases; others suggest significant shifts in his stance on history, solidarity, and justice. Regardless of these disagreements, The Myth of Sisyphus remains a key text for understanding mid‑20th‑century attempts to confront meaninglessness without recourse to transcendence.